×

Environment Stats: compare key data on Guam & Japan

Definitions

STAT Guam Japan HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 14
Ranked 83th.
40
Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Guam
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 9
Ranked 163th.
66
Ranked 23th. 7 times more than Guam
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 2
Ranked 182nd.
27
Ranked 33th. 14 times more than Guam
CO2 emissions > Kt 4,080.58 kt
Ranked 115th.
1.23 million kt
Ranked 5th. 302 times more than Guam

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 24.91 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Japan
9.64 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 33th.

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 25.86 kt
Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Japan
9.64 kt
Ranked 29th.

Current issues extirpation of native bird population by the rapid proliferation of the brown tree snake, an exotic, invasive species air pollution from power plant emissions results in acid rain; acidification of lakes and reservoirs degrading water quality and threatening aquatic life; Japan is one of the largest consumers of fish and tropical timber, contributing to the depletion of these resources in Asia and elsewhere
Endangered species > Bird species 12
Ranked 77th.
40
Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Guam

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 9
Ranked 146th.
40
Ranked 22nd. 4 times more than Guam
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 4
Ranked 113th.
12
Ranked 83th. 3 times more than Guam

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 2
Ranked 175th.
27
Ranked 32nd. 14 times more than Guam
Forest area > Sq. km 260 km²
Ranked 170th.
248,680 km²
Ranked 23th. 956 times more than Guam

Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 1.53 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 127th.
1.95 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 114th. 27% more than Guam

Proportion of land area under protection 26.84%
Ranked 40th. 62% more than Japan
16.54%
Ranked 93th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 99.42
Ranked 51st.
100
Ranked 8th. 1% more than Guam

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 97.39
Ranked 58th.
100
Ranked 9th. 3% more than Guam

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 99.42
Ranked 43th.
100
Ranked 7th. 1% more than Guam

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 4
Ranked 139th.
17
Ranked 85th. 4 times more than Guam
Biodiversity > Number 0.21
Ranked 165th.
35.96
Ranked 9th. 171 times more than Guam

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 0.213
Ranked 170th.
35.96
Ranked 9th. 169 times more than Guam

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 12
Ranked 145th.
216
Ranked 50th. 18 times more than Guam
Proportion of land and marine area under protection 5.27%
Ranked 142nd.
10.97%
Ranked 107th. 2 times more than Guam

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 1.35
Ranked 51st. 5 times more than Japan
0.282
Ranked 99th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 99.42
Ranked 76th.
100
Ranked 13th. 1% more than Guam

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 97.39%
Ranked 53th.
100%
Ranked 8th. 3% more than Guam

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 1.64 km²
Ranked 121st.
1.95 km²
Ranked 111th. 19% more than Guam

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 1,111
Ranked 111th.
315,274
Ranked 3rd. 284 times more than Guam
Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 12
Ranked 61st.
135
Ranked 10th. 11 times more than Guam
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 97.39
Ranked 63th.
100
Ranked 10th. 3% more than Guam

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 2.63%
Ranked 93th.
5.59%
Ranked 71st. 2 times more than Guam

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 7.22
Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Japan
2.49
Ranked 28th.
Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 1.03%
Ranked 77th.
5.19%
Ranked 30th. 5 times more than Guam
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 20.86%
Ranked 43th. 48% more than Japan
14.12%
Ranked 82nd.
Forest area > % of land area 47.27% of land area
Ranked 44th.
68.22% of land area
Ranked 14th. 44% more than Guam

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 146th.
$1.23 billion
Ranked 62nd.

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 12.99%
Ranked 40th.
29.97%
Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Guam

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 137th.
$83.70 million
Ranked 58th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 97.39
Ranked 53th.
100
Ranked 8th. 3% more than Guam

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; United Nations Statistics Division Original html

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×