Transport > Logistics performance index: Overall > 1=low to 5=high: Countries Compared
- Home
- Country Info
- Stats
- Transport
- Logistics performance index: Overall
- 1=low to 5=high
DEFINITION:
Logistics performance index: Overall (1=low to 5=high). Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).
CONTENTS
Loading...
# | COUNTRY | AMOUNT | DATE | GRAPH | HISTORY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Singapore | 4.13 | 2012 | ||
2 | Hong Kong | 4.12 | 2012 | ||
3 | Finland | 4.05 | 2012 | ||
4 | Germany | 4.03 | 2012 | ||
=5 | Netherlands | 4.02 | 2012 | ||
=5 | Denmark | 4.02 | 2012 | ||
7 | Belgium | 3.98 | 2012 | ||
=8 | Japan | 3.93 | 2012 | ||
=8 | United States | 3.93 | 2012 | ||
10 | United Kingdom | 3.9 | 2012 | ||
11 | Austria | 3.89 | 2012 | ||
Group of 7 countries (G7) average (profile) | 3.88 | 2012 | |||
=12 | Sweden | 3.85 | 2012 | ||
=12 | France | 3.85 | 2012 | ||
=12 | Canada | 3.85 | 2012 | ||
15 | Luxembourg | 3.82 | 2012 | ||
16 | Switzerland | 3.8 | 2012 | ||
17 | United Arab Emirates | 3.78 | 2012 | ||
18 | Australia | 3.73 | 2012 | ||
=19 | Spain | 3.7 | 2012 | ||
=19 | South Korea | 3.7 | 2012 | ||
21 | Norway | 3.68 | 2012 | ||
=22 | South Africa | 3.67 | 2012 | ||
=22 | Italy | 3.67 | 2012 | ||
High income OECD countries average (profile) | 3.63 | 2012 | |||
Non-religious countries average (profile) | 3.61 | 2012 | |||
=24 | China | 3.52 | 2012 | ||
=24 | Ireland | 3.52 | 2012 | ||
Eurozone average (profile) | 3.51 | 2012 | |||
26 | Turkey | 3.51 | 2012 | ||
27 | Portugal | 3.5 | 2012 | ||
28 | Malaysia | 3.49 | 2012 | ||
29 | European Union | 3.47 | 2012 | ||
European Union average (profile) | 3.47 | 2012 | |||
30 | Poland | 3.43 | 2012 | ||
NATO countries average (profile) | 3.43 | 2012 | |||
31 | New Zealand | 3.42 | 2012 | ||
32 | Israel | 3.41 | 2010 | ||
33 | Iceland | 3.39 | 2012 | ||
34 | Qatar | 3.32 | 2012 | ||
35 | Slovenia | 3.29 | 2012 | ||
Europe average (profile) | 3.25 | 2012 | |||
36 | Cyprus | 3.24 | 2012 | ||
37 | Bulgaria | 3.21 | 2012 | ||
Cold countries average (profile) | 3.19 | 2012 | |||
=38 | Saudi Arabia | 3.18 | 2012 | ||
=38 | Thailand | 3.18 | 2012 | ||
=40 | Tunisia | 3.17 | 2012 | ||
=40 | Chile | 3.17 | 2012 | ||
=40 | Hungary | 3.17 | 2012 | ||
=43 | Malta | 3.16 | 2012 | ||
=43 | Croatia | 3.16 | 2012 | ||
45 | Czech Republic | 3.14 | 2012 | ||
46 | Brazil | 3.13 | 2012 | ||
47 | India | 3.08 | 2012 | ||
Emerging markets average (profile) | 3.07 | 2012 | |||
48 | Mexico | 3.06 | 2012 | ||
=49 | Argentina | 3.05 | 2012 | ||
=49 | Bahrain | 3.05 | 2012 | ||
=51 | Morocco | 3.03 | 2012 | ||
=51 | Slovakia | 3.03 | 2012 | ||
53 | Philippines | 3.02 | 2012 | ||
=54 | Romania | 3 | 2012 | ||
=54 | Vietnam | 3 | 2012 | ||
56 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2.99 | 2012 | ||
=57 | Egypt | 2.98 | 2012 | ||
=57 | Uruguay | 2.98 | 2012 | ||
59 | Lithuania | 2.95 | 2012 | ||
=60 | Peru | 2.94 | 2012 | ||
=60 | Indonesia | 2.94 | 2012 | ||
62 | Panama | 2.93 | 2012 | ||
Potential Future EU Members average (profile) | 2.92 | 2012 | |||
=63 | Yemen | 2.89 | 2012 | ||
=63 | Oman | 2.89 | 2012 | ||
Eastern Europe average (profile) | 2.87 | 2012 | |||
65 | Colombia | 2.87 | 2012 | ||
66 | Estonia | 2.86 | 2012 | ||
=67 | Ukraine | 2.85 | 2012 | ||
=67 | Benin | 2.85 | 2012 | ||
69 | Botswana | 2.84 | 2012 | ||
Middle Eastern and North Africa average (profile) | 2.84 | 2012 | |||
=70 | Kuwait | 2.83 | 2012 | ||
=70 | Pakistan | 2.83 | 2012 | ||
=70 | Greece | 2.83 | 2012 | ||
=73 | Mauritius | 2.82 | 2012 | ||
=73 | Uganda | 2.82 | 2010 | ||
75 | Malawi | 2.81 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Guatemala | 2.8 | 2012 | ||
=76 | Serbia | 2.8 | 2012 | ||
78 | Latvia | 2.78 | 2012 | ||
Former Spanish colonies average (profile) | 2.77 | 2012 | |||
=79 | Albania | 2.77 | 2012 | ||
=79 | Georgia | 2.77 | 2012 | ||
81 | Ecuador | 2.76 | 2012 | ||
Religious countries average (profile) | 2.76 | 2012 | |||
=82 | Sri Lanka | 2.75 | 2012 | ||
=82 | The Bahamas | 2.75 | 2012 | ||
=82 | Costa Rica | 2.75 | 2012 | ||
85 | Bangladesh | 2.74 | 2010 | ||
86 | Cote d'Ivoire | 2.73 | 2012 | ||
87 | Madagascar | 2.72 | 2012 | ||
88 | Dominican Republic | 2.7 | 2012 | ||
OPEC countries average (profile) | 2.7 | 2012 | |||
=89 | Kazakhstan | 2.69 | 2012 | ||
=89 | Niger | 2.69 | 2012 | ||
South Asia average (profile) | 2.68 | 2012 | |||
=91 | Namibia | 2.65 | 2012 | ||
=91 | Tanzania | 2.65 | 2012 | ||
Muslim countries average (profile) | 2.64 | 2012 | |||
Former Soviet republics average (profile) | 2.61 | 2012 | |||
=93 | Belarus | 2.61 | 2012 | ||
=93 | Bolivia | 2.61 | 2012 | ||
=95 | Guinea-Bissau | 2.6 | 2012 | ||
=95 | Syria | 2.6 | 2012 | ||
=95 | El Salvador | 2.6 | 2012 | ||
=98 | Russia | 2.58 | 2012 | ||
=98 | Togo | 2.58 | 2012 | ||
=98 | Lebanon | 2.58 | 2012 | ||
=101 | Armenia | 2.56 | 2012 | ||
=101 | Cambodia | 2.56 | 2012 | ||
=101 | Republic of Macedonia | 2.56 | 2012 | ||
=101 | Jordan | 2.56 | 2012 | ||
=105 | Zimbabwe | 2.55 | 2012 | ||
=105 | Maldives | 2.55 | 2012 | ||
107 | Nicaragua | 2.54 | 2010 | ||
South and Central Asia average (profile) | 2.53 | 2012 | |||
=108 | Honduras | 2.53 | 2012 | ||
=108 | Cameroon | 2.53 | 2012 | ||
110 | Bhutan | 2.52 | 2012 | ||
Former French colonies average (profile) | 2.52 | 2012 | |||
111 | Ghana | 2.51 | 2012 | ||
112 | Laos | 2.5 | 2012 | ||
=113 | Iran | 2.49 | 2012 | ||
=113 | Senegal | 2.49 | 2012 | ||
=113 | Venezuela | 2.49 | 2012 | ||
=113 | Turkmenistan | 2.49 | 2010 | ||
=117 | Azerbaijan | 2.48 | 2012 | ||
=117 | Sao Tome and Principe | 2.48 | 2012 | ||
=117 | Paraguay | 2.48 | 2012 | ||
=117 | Guinea | 2.48 | 2012 | ||
=121 | The Gambia | 2.46 | 2012 | ||
=121 | Uzbekistan | 2.46 | 2012 | ||
=123 | Nigeria | 2.45 | 2012 | ||
=123 | Montenegro | 2.45 | 2012 | ||
=123 | Liberia | 2.45 | 2012 | ||
126 | Kenya | 2.43 | 2012 | ||
=127 | Jamaica | 2.42 | 2012 | ||
=127 | Fiji | 2.42 | 2012 | ||
failed states average (profile) | 2.41 | 2012 | |||
=129 | Algeria | 2.41 | 2012 | ||
=129 | Solomon Islands | 2.41 | 2012 | ||
131 | Mauritania | 2.4 | 2012 | ||
132 | Papua New Guinea | 2.38 | 2012 | ||
133 | Burma | 2.37 | 2012 | ||
134 | Kyrgyzstan | 2.35 | 2012 | ||
135 | Gabon | 2.34 | 2012 | ||
Sub-Saharan Africa average (profile) | 2.34 | 2007 | |||
=136 | Guyana | 2.33 | 2012 | ||
=136 | Moldova | 2.33 | 2012 | ||
138 | Burkina Faso | 2.32 | 2012 | ||
139 | Afghanistan | 2.3 | 2012 | ||
140 | Mozambique | 2.29 | 2010 | ||
=141 | Angola | 2.28 | 2012 | ||
=141 | Libya | 2.28 | 2012 | ||
=141 | Tajikistan | 2.28 | 2012 | ||
=141 | Zambia | 2.28 | 2010 | ||
=145 | Rwanda | 2.27 | 2012 | ||
=145 | Mali | 2.27 | 2010 | ||
147 | Mongolia | 2.25 | 2012 | ||
=148 | Lesotho | 2.24 | 2012 | ||
=148 | Ethiopia | 2.24 | 2012 | ||
150 | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 2.21 | 2012 | ||
151 | Cuba | 2.2 | 2012 | ||
152 | Iraq | 2.16 | 2012 | ||
153 | Comoros | 2.14 | 2012 | ||
154 | Eritrea | 2.11 | 2012 | ||
155 | Sudan | 2.1 | 2012 | ||
=156 | Sierra Leone | 2.08 | 2012 | ||
=156 | Republic of the Congo | 2.08 | 2012 | ||
158 | Nepal | 2.04 | 2012 | ||
=159 | Chad | 2.03 | 2012 | ||
=159 | Haiti | 2.03 | 2012 | ||
161 | Djibouti | 1.8 | 2012 | ||
162 | East Timor | 1.71 | 2007 | ||
163 | Burundi | 1.61 | 2012 | ||
164 | Somalia | 1.34 | 2010 |
Citation
Interesting observations about Transport > Logistics performance index: Overall > 1=low to 5=high
- United Arab Emirates ranked first for logistics performance index: overall > 1=low to 5=high amongst Muslim countries in 2012.
- Finland ranked first for logistics performance index: overall > 1=low to 5=high amongst Europe in 2012.
- Singapore ranked first for logistics performance index: overall > 1=low to 5=high amongst Hot countries in 2012.
- Germany ranked first for logistics performance index: overall > 1=low to 5=high amongst NATO countries in 2012.
- South Africa ranked first for logistics performance index: overall > 1=low to 5=high amongst Emerging markets in 2012.
- Malaysia ranked first for logistics performance index: overall > 1=low to 5=high amongst Religious countries in 2012.
- Austria ranked first for logistics performance index: overall > 1=low to 5=high amongst Catholic countries in 2012.
- Poland ranked first for logistics performance index: overall > 1=low to 5=high amongst Eastern Europe in 2012.
- United States ranked second for logistics performance index: overall > 1=low to 5=high amongst Former British colonies in 2012.
- Hong Kong ranked second for logistics performance index: overall > 1=low to 5=high globally in 2012.