| Part of a series on | | Creationism | |
Creationism is a religious belief that humanity, life, the Earth, and the universe were created in their original form by a deity or deities (often the Abrahamic God of Judaism, Christianity and Islam), whose existence is presupposed. ...
Image File history File links Size of this preview: 800 Ã 400 pixelsFull resolution (1024 Ã 512 pixel, file size: 53 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg) Michelangelo Buonarrotis The Creation of Adam Faithful reproductions of two-dimensional original works cannot attract copyright in the U.S. according to the rule in...
| | History of creationism Neo-creationism The history of creationism is tied to the history of religions. ...
Neo-creationism is a movement whose goal is to restate creationism in terms more likely to be well received by the public, policy makers, educators, and the scientific community. ...
| | Types of creationism | | Young Earth creationism Old Earth creationism Day-Age creationism Progressive creationism Gap creationism Theistic evolution Intelligent design Adam and Eve, the first human beings according to Genesis. ...
This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject. ...
Day-Age Creationism, a type of Old Earth Creationism, is an effort to reconcile the literal Genesis account of Creation with modern scientific theories on the age of the Universe, the Earth, life, and humans. ...
Progressive creationism is a form of Old Earth creationism that accepts that new species have appeared successively over earths long history but that, to a greater or lesser degree, each species represents a fiat miracle (thus the creationism part), and that the first pair or representatives of species were...
Gap creationism, also called Restitution creationism or Ruin-Reconstruction, are terms used to describe a particular set of Christian beliefs about the creation of the Universe and the origin of man. ...
Theistic evolution, less commonly known as evolutionary creationism, is the general opinion that some or all classical religious teachings about God and creation are compatible with some or all of the modern scientific understanding about biological evolution. ...
For other uses, see Intelligent design (disambiguation). ...
| | Other religious views | | Hindu · Islamic · Jewish Deist · Pandeist Islamic creationism is the belief that the universe (including humanity) was directly created by God as explained in the Quran or Genesis. ...
Jewish views on evolution includes a continuum of views about evolution, creationism, and the origin of life. ...
For other uses, see Ceremonial Deism. ...
Pandeism (Greek Ïάν, pan = all and Latin deus = God, in the sense of deism), is a term used at various times to describe religious beliefs. ...
| | Creation theology | | Creation in Genesis Genesis as an allegory Framework interpretation Omphalos hypothesis THIS IS A FACT Creation is a doctrinal position in many religions and philosophical belief systems which maintains that a single God, or a group of or deities is responsible for creating the universe. ...
This article is about the biblical text. ...
An allegorical interpretation of Genesis is a symbolic, rather than literal, reading of the biblical book of Genesis. ...
The framework interpretation (also known as the literary framework view, framework theory, or framework hypothesis) is an interpretation of the first chapter of the Book of Genesis which holds that the seven-day creation account found therein is not a literal or scientific description of the origins of the universe...
The omphalos hypothesis was named after the title of an 1857 book by Philip Henry Gosse in which he argued that in order for the world to be functional, God must have created the Earth with mountains, canyons, trees with growth rings, Adam and Eve with hair, fingernails, and navels...
| | Creation science | | Baraminology Flood geology Intelligent design Creation science is the attempt to find scientific evidence that would justify a literal interpretation of the Biblical account of creation. ...
Flood geology (also creation geology or diluvial geology) is a prominent subset of beliefs under the umbrella of creationism that assumes the literal truth of a global flood as described in the Genesis account of Noahs Ark. ...
For other uses, see Intelligent design (disambiguation). ...
| | Controversy | | Politics of creationism Public education History Teach the Controversy Associated articles The creation-evolution controversy (also termed the creation vs. ...
The politics of creationism currently primarily concerns what should be taught as science in schools, and what is good science. ...
The status of creation and evolution in public education can be the subject of substantial debate in legal, political, and religious circles. ...
The creation-evolution controversy has a long history, beginning with challenges made by various naturalists to biblical accounts of creation. ...
Teach the Controversy is the name of a Discovery Institute intelligent design campaign to promote intelligent design creationism while discrediting evolution in United States public high school science courses. ...
The following is a clearinghouse of articles which refer to terms often used in the context of the creation-evolution controversy: // Origins Main article: Origin beliefs The creation-evolution controversy often is cast as a controversy surrounding the origin beliefs. ...
| | Creationism Portal · v • d • e | In creation science, baraminology is a system for classifying life into groups having no common ancestry, called "baramins". Classification is based on a literal creationist reading of "kinds" in Genesis, especially the distinction between mankind and other animals. Supplementary criteria include the ability of animals to interbreed and the similarity of their observable traits. Like all of creation science, baraminology is pseudoscience and is unrelated to science: modern biological facts have shown that all life descended from one common ancestor.[1] The scientific alternative to baraminology is cladistics, which classifies species based on evolutionary history. Creation science is the attempt to find scientific evidence that would justify a literal interpretation of the Biblical account of creation. ...
Kinship and descent is one of the major concepts of cultural anthropology. ...
For other uses, see Genesis (disambiguation). ...
Creation science is the attempt to find scientific evidence that would justify a literal interpretation of the Biblical account of creation. ...
A typical 18th century phrenology chart. ...
A magnet levitating above a high-temperature superconductor demonstrates the Meissner effect. ...
This article or section seems not to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia entry. ...
Dad does not seem too surprised; perhaps this has happened to him before! Last Common Ancestor (LCA) is the most recent common ancestor of two populations that came to be separated by a species barrier. ...
It has been suggested that Clade be merged into this article or section. ...
For other uses, see Species (disambiguation). ...
Biblical Kinds The Bible mentions kinds on several occasions. Genesis 1:12-25 gives an account of the creation of living things: For other uses, see Bible (disambiguation). ...
| “ | 24 And God said: 'Let the earth bring forth the living creature after its kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after its kind.' And it was so. 25 And God made the beast of the earth after its kind, and the cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the ground after its kind; and God saw that it was good. | ” | Genesis 7:13-16 states that there are distinct kinds of cattle. In Deuteronomy 14:11-18 varieties of owl, raven, and hawk are presented as distinct kinds. Leviticus 19:19 states that kinds might interbreed. Apart from what is implied by these passages, the Bible does not specify what a kind is. For general information about the genus, including other species of cattle, see Bos. ...
Traditional interpretations, such as those of St. Augustine[2], Thomas Aquinas[3], John Calvin[4], and the Vatican[5], hold that the Bible makes theological and not scientific statements about reality, and that no conflict exists between science and the Bible. A typical interpretation of Genesis, with focus upon the kinds, is that all things were created, that the ordered multitude of creation is as God intended, and that the Darwinian model "is strongly animated by [a] fundamental feeling of solidarity with the whole of creation", the latter in reference to parallel concepts of common descent and common creator.[2]. Augustinus redirects here. ...
Aquinas redirects here. ...
John Calvin (July 10, 1509 â May 27, 1564) was a French Protestant theologian during the Protestant Reformation and was a central developer of the system of Christian theology called Calvinism or Reformed theology. ...
Baraminology Baraminology is founded upon a biblically literal young earth creationist interpretation of the Bible: that each kind was brought into direct physical existence by God and that these kinds share no ancestry. Baraminology emerged as an effort to make this view scientifically appealing.[6] The idea of a baramin was proposed in 1941 by Frank Marsh, but was criticized for a lack of formal definition. In 1990 the work of Kurt Wise and Walter ReMine introduced baraminology as the pursuit of an acceptable definition.[6] ReMine's work specifies four groupings: holobaramins, monobaramins, apobaramins, and polybaramins. These are, respectively, all things of one kind; some things of the same kind; groups of kinds; and any mixed grouping of things. [7] These groups are similar in name to the concepts of monophyly, paraphyly and polyphyly used in phylogenetics Biblical literalism is the supposed adherence to the explicit and literal sense of the Bible. ...
Adam and Eve, the first human beings according to Genesis. ...
Kurt Wise Kurt Patrick Wise is an American young earth creationist with a background in paleontology. ...
In phylogenetics, a group is monophyletic (Greek: of one race) if it consists of an inferred common ancestor and all its descendants. ...
In phylogenetics, a grouping of organisms is said to be paraphyletic (Greek para = near and phyle = race) if all the members of the group have a common ancestor, but the group does not include all the descendants of the most recent common ancestor of all group members. ...
In phylogenetics, a taxon is polyphyletic (Greek for of many races) if the trait its members have in common evolved separately in different places in the phylogenetic tree. ...
Phylogenetic groups, or taxa, can be monophyletic, paraphyletic, or polyphyletic. ...
Conditions for membership in a (holo)baramin and methods of classification have changed over the years. These include the ability to create viable offspring, and morphological similarity.[8] Some creationists have suggested that kind refers to species, while others believe it might mean any animal which may be distinguished in some way from another.[9] Another criterion is "baramin distance" which is calculated based on the similarity of the animals' characters, using methods borrowed from phenetics.[10] In all cases, methods that have been found to place humans and primates into the same baramin have been discarded. [11][12] The term morphology in biology refers to the outward appearance (shape, structure, colour, pattern) of an organism or taxon and its component parts. ...
For other uses, see Species (disambiguation). ...
In biology, phenetics, also known as numerical taxonomy, is an attempt to classify organisms based on overall similarity, usually in morphology or other observable traits, regardless of their phylogeny or evolutionary relation. ...
Criticism Baraminology has been heavily criticized for its lack of rigorous testing and post-study rejection of data to make it better fit the desired findings.[13] Baraminology is a pseudoscience, and has not produced any peer-reviewed scientific research,[14] nor is any word beginning with "baramin" found in Biological Abstracts, which has complete coverage of zoology and botany since 1924.[15] Universal common descent, which states that all life shares a common ancestor, is well-established and tested, and is a scientifically-verified fact.[16] However, neither cladistics, the field devoted to investigating the ancestral relationships between living things, nor the scientific consensus on transitional fossils are accepted by baraminologists.[17] A typical 18th century phrenology chart. ...
Peer review (known as refereeing in some academic fields) is a scholarly process used in the publication of manuscripts and in the awarding of funding for research. ...
For the scientific journal named Science, see Science (journal). ...
Zoology (from Greek: ζῴον, zoion, animal; and λÏγοÏ, logos, knowledge) is the biological discipline which involves the study of animals. ...
Pinguicula grandiflora commonly known as a Butterwort Example of a cross section of a stem [1] Botany is the scientific study of plant life. ...
A group of organisms is said to have common descent if they have a common ancestor. ...
While on board HMS Beagle, Charles Darwin collected numerous specimens, many new to science, which supported his later theory of evolution by natural selection. ...
In mathematics, theory is used informally to refer to a body of knowledge about mathematics. ...
It has been suggested that Clade be merged into this article or section. ...
Scientific consensus is the collective judgment, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of science at a particular time. ...
A transitional fossil is a fossil specimen that combines features of two taxonomical divisions. ...
Notes - ^ National Academy of Sciences. The link is a series of pages on the subject. Note that baraminology is a type of creation science.
- ^ a b Third catechesis by Christoph Cardinal Schönborn on December 4, 2005 in the cathedral of St. Stephan in Vienna.
- ^ Thomas Aquinas vs. The Intelligent Designers
- ^ Theology and Worship - Evolution Statement
- ^ Vatican support of evolution
- ^ a b Wood et al., A Refined Baramin Concept
- ^ Frair and Wayne, Baraminology—Classification of Created Organisms Creation Research Society Quarterly Vol 37 No 2 pp82-91 September 2000 (from the Wayback Machine, retrieved 26 Feb 2007)
- ^ Fundamental Biology (1941), Evolution, Creation, and Science (c. 1944), both by Frank Lewis Marsh
- ^ Payne, J. Barton (1958). "The Concept of "Kinds" In Scyipture". Journal of the American Science Affiliation 10 (December 1958): 17–20. [Note this version appears to have been OCR-scanned without proofreading]
- ^ CRSQ December 2006 Article - The Current Status of Baraminology
- ^ Baraminology Study Group: About the BSG: Taxonomic Concepts and Methods
- ^ Robinson and Cavanaugh, A Quantitative Approach to Baraminology With Examples from the Catarrhine Primates. ...We have found that baraminic distances based on hemoglobin amino acid sequences, 12S-rRNA sequences, and chromosomal data were largely ineffective for identifying the Human holobaramin. Baraminic distances based on ecological and morphological characters, however, were quite reliable for distinguishing humans from nonhuman primates. See also A Review of Friar, W. (2000): Baraminology - Classification of Created Organisms.
- ^ A Review of Friar, W. (2000): Baraminology - Classification of Created Organisms. See also the last two sentences of the abstract of Robinson and Cavanaugh, A Quantitative Approach to Baraminology With Examples from the Catarrhine Primates
- ^ A exhaustive search of the largest scientific publication database using the keyword Baraminology produces zero results
- ^ February 2007 search of Biological Abstracts.
- ^ Theobald, Douglas, 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution
- ^ About the BSG: Taxonomic Concepts and Methods. Phrases to note are: "The mere assumption that the transformation had to occur because cladistic analysis places it at a hypothetical ancestral node does not constitute empirical evidence." and "A good example is Archaeopteryx, which likely represents its own unique baramin, distinct from both dinosaurs and modern birds."
It has been suggested that Clade be merged into this article or section. ...
Species A. lithographica Meyer, 1861 (type) Synonyms See below Archaeopteryx (from Ancient Greek archaios meaning ancient and pteryx meaning feather or wing; pronounced Ar-kay-op-ter-iks ) is the earliest and most primitive known bird to date. ...
|