Harsha or Harshavardhana (606-648) was an Indian emperor who ruled northern India as paramount monarch for over forty years. The events of his reign are related by Hsuan Tsang, the Chinese pilgrim, and by Bana.
He was the son of a king of Thanesar, who gained prominence by successful wars against the Huns, and came to the throne in 606, even though he was only crowned in 622. He devoted himself to a scheme of conquering the whole of India, and carried on wars for thirty years with success, until 620 when he was defeated by Pulakesin II, the greatest emperor of the Chalukya dynasty, who ruled over southern India as he had ruled northern India. The Narmada river formed the boundary between the two empires. In the latter years of his reign, Harsha's sway over the whole basin of the Ganges from the Himalayas to the Narmada river was undisputed.
After thirty-seven years of war he set himself to emulate Asoka (i.e., following Buddhism, etc.) and became a patron of art and literature. He was the last native monarch who held paramount power in the north prior to the Muslim conquest; and was succeeded by an era of petty states.
See Bana, Sri-harsha-charita, trans. Cowell and Thomas (1897); Ettinghausen, Harsha Vardhana (Louvain, 1906).
This article incorporates text from the public domain 1911 Encyclopędia Britannica.
Harsha united the small republics from Punjab to Central India, and they, at an assembly, crowned Harsha king in April 606 AD when he was merely 16 year old.
Harsha Vardhan ascended the throne at the age of 16.
Harsha's ambition of extending his power to the Deccan and Southern India were stopped by Pulakesin II, the Chalukya king of Vatapi in Northern Karnataka.
Harsha was the younger of two sons of the Pushyabhuti ruler Prabhakaravardhana.
Harsha does not seem to have devised any new administrative policies or techniques, nor does it appear that the network of political and economic control was as secure as that of the Mauryas or the imperial Guptas before him.
Harsha's participation in the cultured life of his court was more direct than that of most kings, and it is in his personal contribution to Sanskrit literature that he clearly overshadows them.