FACTOID # 1: Guinea has the wettest capital on Earth, with 3.7 metres of rain a year.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Nicaragua v. United States

The Republic of Nicaragua v. The United States of America is a case heard by the International Court of Justice which found that the United States had violated international law by supporting Contra guerrillas in their war against the Nicaraguan government and by mining Nicaragua's harbors. The Court ruled in Nicaragua's favor, but the United States refused to abide by the Court's decision, on the basis that the court erred in finding that it had jurisdiction to hear the case. The International Court of Justice (known colloquially as the World Court or ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations. ... This article needs to be cleaned up to conform to a higher standard of quality. ... The Contras (Spanish contrarrevolucionario, counter-revolutionary) were the armed opponents of Nicaraguas Sandinista National Liberation Front Government Junta of National Reconstruction following the July 1979 overthrow of Anastasio Somoza Debayle and the ending of the Somoza familys 43-year rule. ...


After the Court's decision, the United States withdrew its declaration accepting the Court's compulsory jurisdiction.

Contents


U.S. defense and response

The United States refused to participate in the merits phase of the proceedings, but the Court found that the US refusal did not prevent it from deciding the case. The Court also rejected the United States defense that its action constituted collective self-defense.


The United States argued that the Court did not have jurisdiction, with U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Jeane Kirkpatrick dismissing the Court as a "semi-legal, semi-juridical, semi-political body which nations sometimes accept and sometimes don't." The court disputed such claims, although among the judges themselves significant debate centered on the court's powers and jurisdictions. The United Nations, or UN, is an international organization established in 1945. ... Jeane Jordan Kirkpatrick (born November 19, 1926) is an American conservative political scientist and member of the neoconservative movement. ...


On November 3rd 1986 the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution in order to pressure the U.S. to pay the fine. Only El Salvador, which also had disputes with Nicaragua, and Israel voted with the U.S. In spite of this resolution, the U.S. still elected not to pay the fine. November 3 is the 307th day of the year (308th in leap years) in the Gregorian Calendar, with 58 days remaining. ... 1986 is a common year starting on Wednesday of the Gregorian calendar. ... United Nations General Assembly The United Nations General Assembly (GA) is one of the six principal organs of the United Nations. ...


The ruling

On June 27, 1986, the Court found that: June 27 is the 178th day of the year (179th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar, with 187 days remaining. ... 1986 is a common year starting on Wednesday of the Gregorian calendar. ...

  • The United States of America, by training, arming, equipping, financing and supplying the Contra forces or otherwise encouraging, supporting and aiding military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua, has acted, against the Republic of Nicaragua, in breach of its obligation under customary international law not to intervene in the affairs of another State.
  • The United States of America, by certain attacks on Nicaraguan territory in 1983-1984, namely attacks on Puerto Sandino on September 13 and October 14 1983, an attack on Corinto on October 10 1983; an attack on Potosi Naval Base on January 4 and 5 1984, an attack on San Juan del Sur on March 7 1984; attacks on patrol boats at Puerto Sandino on March 28 and 30 1984; and an attack on San Juan del Norte on April 9 1984; and further by those acts of intervention referred to [above] which involve the use of force, has acted, against the Republic of Nicaragua, in breach of its obligation under customary international law not to use force against another State.
  • The United States of America, by directing or authorizing over Rights of Nicaraguan territory, and by the acts imputable to the United States referred to [above], has acted, against the Republic of Nicaragua, in breach of its obligation under customary international law not to violate the sovereignty of another State.
  • By laying mines in the internal or territorial waters of the Republic of Nicaragua during the first months of 1984, the United States of America has acted, against the Republic of Nicaragua, in breach of its obligations under customary international law not to use force against another State, not to intervene in its affairs, not to violate its sovereignty and not to interrupt peaceful maritime commerce.
  • The United States of America, by the attacks on Nicaraguan territory referred to [above], and by declaring a general embargo on trade with Nicaragua on May 1 1985, has acted in breach of its obligations under Article XIX of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation between the Parties signed at Managua on January 21, 1956.
  • The United States of America, by producing in 1983 a manual entitled 'Operaciones sicológicas en guerra de guerrillas', and disseminating it to Contra forces, has encouraged the commission by them of acts contrary to general principles of humanitarian law; but [the Court] did not find a basis for concluding that any such acts which may have been committed were imputable to the United States of America as acts of the United States of America.

The Contras (Spanish contrarrevolucionario, counter-revolutionary) were the armed opponents of Nicaraguas Sandinista National Liberation Front Government Junta of National Reconstruction following the July 1979 overthrow of Anastasio Somoza Debayle and the ending of the Somoza familys 43-year rule. ... 1983 is a common year starting on Saturday of the Gregorian calendar. ... 1984 is a leap year starting on Sunday of the Gregorian calendar. ... September 13 is the 256th day of the year (257th in leap years). ... October 14 is the 287th day of the year (288th in Leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... October 10 is the 283rd day of the year (284th in Leap years). ... January 4 is the 4th day of the year in the Gregorian Calendar. ... January 5 is the 5th day of the year in the Gregorian Calendar. ... March 7 is the 66th day of the year in the Gregorian Calendar (67th in Leap years). ... March 28 is the 87th day of the year in the Gregorian Calendar (88th in Leap years). ... March 30 is the 89th day of the year in the Gregorian Calendar (90th in Leap years). ... San Juan del Norte is a municipality in the Río San Juan department of Nicaragua. ... April 9 is the 99th day of the year in the Gregorian calendar (100th in leap years). ... May 1 is the 121st day of the year in the Gregorian calendar (122nd in leap years). ... January 21 is the 21st day of the year in the Gregorian Calendar. ... 1956 was a leap year starting on Sunday of the Gregorian calendar. ...

Legal Clarification

The ruling did in many ways clarify issues surrounding prohibition of the use of force and the right of self-defence (UN Charter art.2(4) and art. 51, both considered to be customary international law). Arming and training the Contra was found to be in breach with principles of non-intervention and prohibition of use of force, so was laying mines in Nicaraguan territorial waters. Nicaraguas dealings with the armed opposition in El Salvador, although it might be considered a breach with the principle of non-intervention and the prohibiton of use of force, did not constitute "an armed attack" which is the wording in art. 51 justifying the right of self-defence. The Court also considered the United States claim to be acting in collective self-defence of El Salvador, and found the conditions for this not reached, as El Salvador never requested the assistance of the United States on the grounds of self-defence. The United Nations Charter is the constitution of the United Nations. ... Customary international law Unwritten law applied to the behaviour of nations. ...


How the Judges voted

Votes of Judges - Nicaragua v. United States
Judge Operative Paragraph
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
President Nagendra Singh (India) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Vice-President de Lacharrière (France) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Judge Ago (Italy) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Judge Bedjaoui (Algeria) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Judge Elias (Nigeria) N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Judge Lachs (Poland) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Judge Mbaye (Senegal) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Judge Ni (China) N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Judge Oda (Japan) Y N N N N N Y N N N N N N Y Y Y
Judge Ruda (Argentina) N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Judge Schwebel (United States) Y N N N N N N Y Y N N N N N N Y
Judge Sette-Camara (Brazil) N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Judge Sir Robert Jennings (United Kingdom) Y N N N N N Y Y Y N N N N Y Y Y
Judge ad hoc Colliard (France) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y

Related links

A TIME Magazine cover of Oliver Norths testifying in front of the U.S. Congress. ...

External links

  • From the Court's website

References

  • Howard Friel; Richard A. Falk (2004) The Record of the Paper: How the New York Times Misreports US Foreign Policy, Verso. ISBN 1844670198

  Results from FactBites:
 
Nicaragua v. United States - Definition, explanation (552 words)
The United States of America was a case heard by the International Court of Justice in which it was alleged that the United States had violated international law by supporting Contra guerrillas in their war against the Nicaraguan government and by mining Nicaragua's harbors.
The United States argued that the Court did not have jurisdiction, with U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Jeane Kirkpatrick dismissing the Court as a "semi-legal, semi-juridical, semi-political body which nations sometimes accept and sometimes don't." The court disputed such claims, although among the judges themselves significant debate centered around the court's powers and jurisdictions.
Nicaraguas dealings with the armed opposition in El Salvador, although it might be considered a breach with the principle of non-intervention and the prohibiton of use of force, did not constitute "an armed attack" which is the wording in art.
Nicaragua / ICJ :: ICJ Judgement 27 June 1986 (6290 words)
The United States is under an obligation to "respect" the Conventions and even to "ensure respect" for them, and thus not to encourage persons or groups engaged in the conflict in Nicaragua to act in violation of the provisions of Article 3.
In the instant case, however, the United States, while invoking the multilateral treaty reservation to challenge the exercise of jurisdiction by the Court, had in the meantime persistently claimed that the multilateral treaties, which constitute the very basis of its reservation, should alone be applied to the case in dispute.
Nicaragua had also joined with the Salvadoran rebels in the organization, planning and training for their acts of insurgency, and had provided them with command-and-control facilities, bases, communications and sanctuary which enabled the leadership of the Salvadoran rebels to operate from Nicaraguan territory.
  More results at FactBites »


 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.