×

Environment Stats: compare key data on Greenland & United Kingdom

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Greenland United Kingdom HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 1
Ranked 200th.
4
Ranked 174th. 4 times more than Greenland
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 7
Ranked 174th.
43
Ranked 45th. 6 times more than Greenland
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 7
Ranked 122nd. 40% more than United Kingdom
5
Ranked 148th.
CO2 emissions > Kt 567.77 kt
Ranked 162nd.
558,461 kt
Ranked 8th. 984 times more than Greenland

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 10 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 29th. 7% more than United Kingdom
9.37 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 35th.

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 10 kt
Ranked 25th. 7% more than United Kingdom
9.38 kt
Ranked 31st.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt 634.39
Ranked 163th.
493,504.86
Ranked 11th. 778 times more than Greenland

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 11.15
Ranked 22nd. 41% more than United Kingdom
7.93
Ranked 39th.

Current issues protection of the arctic environment; preservation of the Inuit traditional way of life, including whaling and seal hunting continues to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (has met Kyoto Protocol target of a 12.5% reduction from 1990 levels and intends to meet the legally binding target and move toward a domestic goal of a 20% cut in emissions by 2010); by 2005 the government reduced the amount of industrial and commercial waste disposed of in landfill sites to 85% of 1998 levels and recycled or composted at least 25% of household waste, increasing to 33% by 2015
Emissions > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 9.2
Ranked 34th. 4% more than United Kingdom
8.84
Ranked 39th.

Endangered species > Bird species 0.0
Ranked 192nd.
2
Ranked 172nd.

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 6
Ranked 168th.
34
Ranked 26th. 6 times more than Greenland
Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 6
Ranked 122nd. 20% more than United Kingdom
5
Ranked 139th.
Proportion of land area under protection 41.09%
Ranked 15th. 47% more than United Kingdom
27.91%
Ranked 36th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 13th. The same as United Kingdom
100
Ranked 14th.

Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 1
Ranked 152nd.
14
Ranked 79th. 14 times more than Greenland

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 11.15
Ranked 22nd. 41% more than United Kingdom
7.93
Ranked 39th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.31
Ranked 140th. 50% more than United Kingdom
$0.21
Ranked 165th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 15th. The same as United Kingdom
100
Ranked 18th.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kt 520.29
Ranked 160th.
539,175.92
Ranked 9th. 1036 times more than Greenland

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 100
Ranked 12th. The same as United Kingdom
100
Ranked 14th.

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 1
Ranked 172nd.
15
Ranked 91st. 15 times more than Greenland
Biodiversity > Number 1.05
Ranked 117th.
3.55
Ranked 65th. 3 times more than Greenland

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 1.05
Ranked 122nd.
3.55
Ranked 66th. 3 times more than Greenland

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.42
Ranked 130th. 35% more than United Kingdom
$0.31
Ranked 155th.

Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources > Total > Billion cubic meters 603
Ranked 16th. 4 times more than United Kingdom
145
Ranked 46th.

Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita > Cubic meters 10.66 million
Ranked 1st. 4515 times more than United Kingdom
2,361.3
Ranked 92nd.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 7
Ranked 165th.
778
Ranked 27th. 111 times more than Greenland
Proportion of land and marine area under protection 40.59%
Ranked 10th. 74% more than United Kingdom
23.37%
Ranked 44th.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 18.65
Ranked 9th. 323 times more than United Kingdom
0.0578
Ranked 154th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 100
Ranked 19th. The same as United Kingdom
100
Ranked 20th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 100%
Ranked 14th. The same as United Kingdom
100%
Ranked 17th.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 147
Ranked 158th.
147,199
Ranked 6th. 1001 times more than Greenland
Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt 0.0
Ranked 158th.
117,677.7
Ranked 16th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 0.0
Ranked 161st.
3.12
Ranked 21st.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 11.15
Ranked 5th. 4 times more than United Kingdom
2.81
Ranked 58th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt 0.0
Ranked 161st.
194,251.99
Ranked 7th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 0.0
Ranked 158th.
1.89
Ranked 32nd.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 2
Ranked 121st.
149
Ranked 7th. 75 times more than Greenland
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 100
Ranked 16th. The same as United Kingdom
100
Ranked 19th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > Current US$ $302.45 million
Ranked 135th.
$368.16 billion
Ranked 6th. 1217 times more than Greenland

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 36.69%
Ranked 14th. 2 times more than United Kingdom
16.61%
Ranked 35th.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 2.62
Ranked 23th. 4% more than United Kingdom
2.51
Ranked 26th.
Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt 634.39
Ranked 158th.
174,897.57
Ranked 17th. 276 times more than Greenland

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 142nd.
0.0
Ranked 155th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > % of total 100%
Ranked 26th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
35.44%
Ranked 157th.

Total natural resources rents > % of GDP 0.0
Ranked 186th.
1.53%
Ranked 110th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 100
Ranked 14th. The same as United Kingdom
100
Ranked 17th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.22%
Ranked 124th. 38% more than United Kingdom
0.16%
Ranked 139th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > % of GNI 16.49%
Ranked 7th. 21% more than United Kingdom
13.65%
Ranked 28th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > % of total 0.0
Ranked 158th.
23.85%
Ranked 46th.

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 0.0923%
Ranked 142nd.
18.21%
Ranked 28th. 197 times more than Greenland

Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.24% of GNI
Ranked 131st. 33% more than United Kingdom
0.18% of GNI
Ranked 141st.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 41.91%
Ranked 5th. 9 times more than United Kingdom
4.56%
Ranked 38th.
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 39.73%
Ranked 11th. 78% more than United Kingdom
22.35%
Ranked 37th.
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 116th.
0.0
Ranked 126th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > % of total 0.0
Ranked 161st.
39.36%
Ranked 29th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 149th.
$57.72 billion
Ranked 12th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 133th.
2.14%
Ranked 49th.

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; Food and Agriculture Organisation, AQUASTAT data.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; World Bank staff estimates using data from the United Nations Statistics Division's National Accounts Statistics.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium; United Nations Statistics Division Original html; World Bank staff estimates based on Samuel Fankhauser's ""Valuing Climate Change: The Economics of the Greenhouse"" (1995).

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×