Energy > Petroleum Coke Stats: compare key data on Canada & Denmark

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Canada	Denmark	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-4,000 ton Ranked 22nd.	27,000 ton Ranked 5th.
Changes in stocks per million	-123.793 ton Ranked 17th.	4,982.07 ton Ranked 4th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	12.05 ton Ranked 14th.	46.87 ton Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Canada
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	12.05 ton Ranked 12th.	46.87 ton Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Canada
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	33.55 ton Ranked 1st. 6 times more than Denmark	5.54 ton Ranked 2nd.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	33.55 ton Ranked 1st. 6 times more than Denmark	5.54 ton Ranked 5th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	47.47 ton Ranked 11th. 3% more than Denmark	46.13 ton Ranked 13th.
Exports	164,000 ton Ranked 11th. 8 times more than Denmark	20,000 ton Ranked 19th.
Exports per 1000	5.08 ton Ranked 10th. 38% more than Denmark	3.69 ton Ranked 11th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	170.96 ton Ranked 2nd. 4 times more than Denmark	46.13 ton Ranked 18th.
Imports	1.69 million ton Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Denmark	297,000 ton Ranked 17th.
Imports > Per capita	52.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.	54.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 5% more than Canada
Imports per 1000	52.43 ton Ranked 14th.	54.8 ton Ranked 12th. 5% more than Canada
Net inland availability > Per capita	12.05 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th.	47.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Canada
Statistical differences > Per capita	-46,719,712,684,603.203 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 24th. 32 times more than Denmark	-1,477,110,874,527.19 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 21st.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	12.05 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 14th.	46.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Canada
Consumption by other industries and construction	378,000 ton Ranked 8th. 49% more than Denmark	254,000 ton Ranked 14th.
Consumption by industry and construction	378,000 ton Ranked 8th. 49% more than Denmark	254,000 ton Ranked 14th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	1.08 million ton Ranked 3rd. 37 times more than Denmark	29,000 ton Ranked 8th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	12.05 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.	46.9 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Canada
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	33.56 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 6 times more than Denmark	5.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 2nd.
Conversion in thermal power plants	1.08 million ton Ranked 3rd. 37 times more than Denmark	29,000 ton Ranked 5th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	33.56 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 6 times more than Denmark	5.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.
Energy balance requirement	1.53 million ton Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Denmark	250,000 ton Ranked 15th.
Exports > Per capita	5.08 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 38% more than Denmark	3.69 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	171.03 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 3rd. 4 times more than Denmark	46.16 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 18th.
Gross inland availability	5.52 million ton Ranked 3rd. 22 times more than Denmark	250,000 ton Ranked 28th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	47,493.73 ton per 1 million people Ranked 11th. 3% more than Denmark	46,159.71 ton per 1 million people Ranked 13th.
Net inland availability	378,000 ton Ranked 8th. 47% more than Denmark	258,000 ton Ranked 14th.
Net inland availability per 1000	12.05 ton Ranked 15th.	47.61 ton Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Canada

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation