Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Japan

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Canada	Japan
Consumption	103.3 billion cu m Ranked 5th.	112.6 billion cu m Ranked 4th. 9% more than Canada
Consumption > Per capita	2.78 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Japan	787,077.22 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 41st.
Consumption per capita	2,805.47 cu m Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Japan	742.17 cu m Ranked 30th.
Imports	31.31 billion cu m Ranked 18th.	122.2 billion cu m Ranked 1st. 4 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	102,164 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Japan	35,348 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	646,600 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 48% more than Japan	435,726 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	20.53 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 20 times more than Japan	1.03 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Japan	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	68.46 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Japan	10.06 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	1.97 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 127 times more than Japan	0.0156 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	51,396.94 cu m Ranked 25th. 313 times more than Japan	163.99 cu m Ranked 85th.
Proved reserves	1.93 trillion cu m Ranked 17th. 92 times more than Japan	20.9 billion cu m Ranked 73th.
Reserves	1.69 trillion cubic feet Ranked 13th. 84 times more than Japan	20.02 billion cubic feet Ranked 56th.
Reserves per capita	52,333.5 cubic feet Ranked 19th. 334 times more than Japan	156.68 cubic feet Ranked 66th.
Imports per capita	491.89 cu m Ranked 24th.	707.84 cu m Ranked 18th. 44% more than Canada
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	3.33 Ranked 4th. 24% more than Japan	2.68 Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	20.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 20 times more than Japan	1.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	372,423 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	2.05 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.16 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Japan	0.277 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	1.59 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 289 times more than Japan	0.00551 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	5.01 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 40 times more than Japan	0.127 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Japan	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	255.96 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 246 times more than Japan	1.04 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	221.87 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 213 times more than Japan	1.04 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	2.52 Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Japan	0.508 Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	36.25 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 4 times more than Japan	8.18 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	80.5 Ranked 4th. 24% more than Japan	64.9 Ranked 8th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-284,510 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	4,846 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	23,201 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Japan	6,919 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Japan	0.277 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	638,219 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 62 times more than Japan	10,233 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	2.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Japan	0.572 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	504,864 Terajoules Ranked 4th.	608,830 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 21% more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	15.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Japan	4.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	1.59 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 266 times more than Japan	0.006 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	51,445 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 73 times more than Japan	704 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	663,314 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Japan	131,972 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	162,015 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 10 times more than Japan	16,206 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	5.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 39 times more than Japan	0.127 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Japan	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	453,203 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	2.06 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	14.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	16.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st. 15% more than Canada
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Japan	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 14% more than Japan	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	8.27 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 62 times more than Japan	133,094 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	1,972.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 127 times more than Japan	15.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 84th.
Including LNG > Total resources	63.72 million Terajoules Ranked 19th. 32 times more than Japan	1.99 million Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	7.15 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 3rd.	-1,045,783,962,308.45 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 45th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	3.33 Ranked 4th. 24% more than Japan	2.68 Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	14.03 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	16.14 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 15% more than Canada
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	804.66 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 15 times more than Japan	55.37 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.68 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 13 times more than Japan	0.13 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-8,805.088 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	37.93 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	20.01 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Japan	3.41 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	21.48 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 53 times more than Japan	0.407 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	26.02 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 14 times more than Japan	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 56th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	2.33 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Japan	0.572 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	19.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 247 times more than Japan	0.0801 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	804.66 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th. 15 times more than Japan	55.37 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	21.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 53 times more than Japan	0.407 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	694,103 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 13 times more than Japan	52,067 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	26.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 14 times more than Japan	1.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.17 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 12% more than Japan	1.04 million Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	36.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 4 times more than Japan	8.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	840,678 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Japan	240,402 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	54,387 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Japan	16,607 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 13 times more than Japan	0.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	11.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.	16.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 39% more than Canada
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 14% more than Japan	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Imports	364,396 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	3.15 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 9 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	11.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.	24.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 2 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Net > Production	7.17 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 54 times more than Japan	133,094 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	2.21 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 72% more than Japan	1.28 million Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	68.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Japan	10.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.
Proved > Reserves	1.75 trillion cu m Ranked 21st. 84 times more than Japan	20.9 billion cu m Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	75,200 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 3% more than Japan	73,082 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	2.8 Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Japan	0.565 Ranked 39th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	89.5 Ranked 4th. 24% more than Japan	72.2 Ranked 8th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	8.6 Ranked 4th. 23% more than Japan	7 Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	15.62 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Japan	4.76 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	11.53 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	16.01 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 39% more than Canada
Proved reserves per capita	55,831.64 cu m Ranked 22nd. 340 times more than Japan	164.24 cu m Ranked 90th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	20.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Japan	3.41 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	11.28 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	24.69 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 2 times more than Canada

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Canada and Japan in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Japan

Definitions

Citation

Compare Canada and Japan in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Canada and Japan in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation