Consumption by industry and construction
|
25,350 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
|
28,645 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.
13% more than
Canada
|
|
Consumption by industry and construction
>
Per capita
|
0.785 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th.
|
1.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th.
59% more than
Canada
|
|
Consumption by iron and steel industry
|
25,350 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.
|
28,645 Terajoules
Ranked 8th.
13% more than
Canada
|
|
Consumption by iron and steel industry
>
Per capita
|
0.785 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th.
|
1.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 6th.
59% more than
Canada
|
|
Conversion in thermal power plants
|
2,679 Terajoules
Ranked 23th.
|
13,213 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.
5 times more
than
Canada
|
|
Conversion in thermal power plants
>
Per capita
|
0.083 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 26th.
|
0.577 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 13th.
7 times more
than
Canada
|
|
Conversion to other forms of energy
|
2,679 Terajoules
Ranked 23th.
|
13,213 Terajoules
Ranked 11th.
5 times more
than
Canada
|
|
Conversion to other forms of energy
>
Per capita
|
0.083 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 26th.
|
0.577 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 13th.
7 times more
than
Canada
|
|
Gross inland availability
|
28,029 Terajoules
Ranked 16th.
|
41,904 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
50% more than
Canada
|
|
Gross inland availability
>
Per capita
|
0.868 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th.
|
1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th.
2 times more
than
Canada
|
|
Net inland availability
|
25,350 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
|
28,645 Terajoules
Ranked 9th.
13% more than
Canada
|
|
Net inland availability
>
Per capita
|
0.785 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 12th.
|
1.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th.
59% more than
Canada
|
|
Production
|
28,029 Terajoules
Ranked 16th.
|
41,904 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
50% more than
Canada
|
|
Production
>
Per capita
|
0.868 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th.
|
1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th.
2 times more
than
Canada
|
|