Energy > Natural gas > Including LNG Stats: compare key data on Denmark & South Korea

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Denmark	South Korea	HISTORY
Consumption by chemical industry	3,980 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	19,581 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 5 times more than Denmark
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.734 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 81% more than South Korea	0.407 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 24 times more than South Korea	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 57th.
Consumption by households	32,277 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	389,538 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 12 times more than Denmark
Consumption by households per 1000	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	8.09 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 36% more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	6.15 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 53% more than South Korea	4.03 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.143 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	0.888 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 6 times more than Denmark
Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 24 times more than South Korea	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 94% more than South Korea	2.72 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.27 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 93% more than South Korea	2.73 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Conversion in thermal power plants	93,184 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	509,700 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 5 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 43% more than South Korea	26.46 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Gross > Production per 1000	82.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 193 times more than South Korea	0.426 Terajoules Ranked 75th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 43% more than South Korea	26.46 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Net inland availability per 1000	14.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	15.45 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 7% more than Denmark
Net > Production per 1000	80.55 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 189 times more than South Korea	0.426 Terajoules Ranked 75th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.34 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	11.11 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 33% more than Denmark
Changes in stocks	-1,226 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	-38,317 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 31 times more than Denmark
Changes in stocks at producers	4,969 Terajoules Ranked 9th.	9,925 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. Twice as much as Denmark
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.735 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 81% more than South Korea	0.405 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	5.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 24 times more than South Korea	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 58th.
Consumption by energy sector	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 3 times more than South Korea	11,376 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 53% more than South Korea	4.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers	45,221 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	534,714 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 12 times more than Denmark
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.	11.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 33% more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction	33,309 Terajoules Ranked 54th.	193,894 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 6 times more than Denmark
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	461.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th. 19 times more than South Korea	23.67 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 31st.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	4,855 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	5,541 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 14% more than Denmark
Consumption in agriculture	2,498 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 2 times more than South Korea	1,143 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.896 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 8 times more than South Korea	0.115 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	17.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 63% more than South Korea	10.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 43% more than South Korea	26.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	98,659 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	515,241 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 5 times more than Denmark
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 71% more than South Korea	10.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 43% more than South Korea	26.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Gross inland availability	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	1.27 million Terajoules Ranked 20th. 6 times more than Denmark
Gross > Production	444,626 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 22 times more than South Korea	20,495 Terajoules Ranked 66th.
Net > Production	436,520 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 21 times more than South Korea	20,495 Terajoules Ranked 65th.
Net inland availability	78,530 Terajoules Ranked 49th.	743,674 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 9 times more than Denmark
Net inland availability > Per capita	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	15.4 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th. 6% more than Denmark
Statistical differences > Per capita	-654,175,478,556.227 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 43th.	66.82 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 20th.
Changes in stocks at producers per million	957.67 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 4 times more than South Korea	223.27 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.896 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 8 times more than South Korea	0.115 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Changes in stocks per million	-226.223 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	-795.982 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 4 times more than Denmark
Consumption by households > Per capita	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.	8.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 35% more than Denmark
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	957.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 4 times more than South Korea	223.27 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd.
Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 3 times more than South Korea	11,376 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.143 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	0.885 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 6 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other consumers	10,446 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	144,033 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 14 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.	2.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 55% more than Denmark
Consumption by other industries and construction	28,556 Terajoules Ranked 50th.	131,569 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 5 times more than Denmark
Energy balance requirement	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	1.27 million Terajoules Ranked 20th. 6 times more than Denmark
Consumption by iron and steel industry	773 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	42,744 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 55 times more than Denmark
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 70% more than South Korea	10.7 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	2.99 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 55% more than Denmark
Consumption in agriculture per million	460.93 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 19 times more than South Korea	23.74 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.19 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 62% more than South Korea	10.59 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation