Energy > Steam and hot water Stats: compare key data on Denmark & South Korea

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Denmark	South Korea	HISTORY
Consumption by chemical industry per million	167.73 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	1,606.78 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 10 times more than Denmark
Consumption by households > Per capita	11.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 9 times more than South Korea	1.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	17.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 12 times more than South Korea	1.43 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	17.33 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 12 times more than South Korea	1.44 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.27 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	2.49 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 96% more than Denmark
Consumption by iron and steel industry per million	42.62 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 31 times more than South Korea	1.37 Terajoules Ranked 17th.
Consumption by other consumers	29,063 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 3 times more than South Korea	8,473 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	5.36 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 30 times more than South Korea	0.176 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Consumption by other industries and construction	5,767 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	42,756 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	1.06 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 20% more than South Korea	0.888 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants per 1000	4.13 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 9 times more than South Korea	0.446 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants per 1000	19.39 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 5 times more than South Korea	3.56 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	18.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 5 times more than South Korea	3.92 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.
Station use and station loss per million	232.68 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 10 times more than South Korea	22.59 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-3,138,860,608.369 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 9th.	0.0 Ranked 22nd.
Gross > Production > Per capita	23.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 6 times more than South Korea	4.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants > Per capita	4.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 9 times more than South Korea	0.444 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants > Per capita	19.4 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 5 times more than South Korea	3.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants	105,072 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	171,544 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 63% more than Denmark
Consumption by chemical industry	909 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	77,347 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 85 times more than Denmark
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.168 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.	1.6 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 10 times more than Denmark
Consumption by industry and construction	6,907 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	120,103 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Denmark
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	5.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 31 times more than South Korea	0.175 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	1.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 20% more than South Korea	0.885 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	25,294 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 7 times more than South Korea	3,741 Terajoules Ranked 17th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	4.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 1st. 61 times more than South Korea	0.077 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	23.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 6 times more than South Korea	4.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	93,917 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 36% more than South Korea	69,153 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.	2.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 95% more than Denmark
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	42.65 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 8th. 31 times more than South Korea	1.37 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 17th.
Gross inland availability	126,455 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	193,499 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 53% more than Denmark
Station use and station loss > Per capita	0.233 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 10 times more than South Korea	0.023 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants	22,372 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 4% more than South Korea	21,453 Terajoules Ranked 17th.
Consumption by households	62,869 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 4% more than South Korea	60,680 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	231 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 4 times more than South Korea	65 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Net inland availability	100,824 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	189,256 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 88% more than Denmark
Gross inland availability per 1000	23.33 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 6 times more than South Korea	4.02 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Net inland availability per 1000	18.6 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 5 times more than South Korea	3.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Station use and station loss	1,261 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 17% more than South Korea	1,081 Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per 1000	4.67 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 60 times more than South Korea	0.0777 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Consumption by households per 1000	11.6 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 9 times more than South Korea	1.26 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation