Energy > Blast Furnace Gas Stats: compare key data on Finland & Germany

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Finland	Germany	HISTORY
Consumption by industry and construction per million	1,758.64 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. Twice as much as Germany	877.96 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	0.122 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th.	0.216 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 77% more than Finland
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	468 Terajoules Ranked 5th.	3,447 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 7 times more than Finland
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	89.21 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Germany	41.77 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per million	89.21 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Germany	41.77 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Conversion in thermal power plants	7,731 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	64,324 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Finland
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	1.47 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 89% more than Germany	0.78 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	8,199 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	64,324 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Finland
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	1.56 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. Twice as much as Germany	0.78 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per million	1,562.88 Terajoules Ranked 4th. Twice as much as Germany	779.97 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Gross inland availability	18,063 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	167,360 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 9 times more than Finland
Gross inland availability > Per capita	3.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 70% more than Germany	2.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th.
Net inland availability	9,226 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	72,405 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Finland
Net inland availability > Per capita	1.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. Twice as much as Germany	0.878 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.
Production > Per capita	3.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 70% more than Germany	2.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per million	1,758.64 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. Twice as much as Germany	877.96 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. Twice as much as Germany	0.878 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. Twice as much as Germany	0.878 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.
Consumption by industry and construction	9,226 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	72,405 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Finland
Consumption by iron and steel industry	9,226 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	72,405 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Finland
Production	18,063 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	167,360 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 9 times more than Finland
Net inland availability per million	1,758.64 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. Twice as much as Germany	877.96 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per million	1,473.67 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 89% more than Germany	779.97 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	3.44 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 70% more than Germany	2.03 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Production per 1000	3.44 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 70% more than Germany	2.03 Terajoules Ranked 12th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation