Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Germany & Poland

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Germany	Poland
Consumption	78.99 billion cu m Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Poland	14.38 billion cu m Ranked 24th.
Consumption > Per capita	1.18 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 3 times more than Poland	425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 51st.
Consumption per capita	1,175.3 cu m Ranked 16th. 3 times more than Poland	428.03 cu m Ranked 41st.
Imports	87.96 billion cu m Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Poland	37.38 billion cu m Ranked 13th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	240,000 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 27 times more than Poland	9,004 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	1.35 million Terajoules Ranked 4th. 9 times more than Poland	150,123 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	1.33 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 2 times more than Poland	0.582 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	1.6 Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Poland	0.4 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres	16.4 Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Poland	4.4 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.61 Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Poland	0.16 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	0.199 Ranked 37th. 72% more than Poland	0.115 Ranked 42nd.
Proved reserves	125 billion cu m Ranked 48th. 36% more than Poland	92 billion cu m Ranked 53th.
Reserves	298.3 billion cubic feet Ranked 27th. 93% more than Poland	154.4 billion cubic feet Ranked 31st.
Reserves per capita	3,617.1 cubic feet Ranked 41st.	4,045.54 cubic feet Ranked 39th. 12% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.243 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 21% more than Poland	0.2 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	6.61 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Poland	2.58 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	4.4 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 101 times more than Poland	0.0437 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	45.61 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 3 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	33.36 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Poland	9.69 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	2,147.3 cu m Ranked 65th.	4,315.98 cu m Ranked 55th. Twice as much as Germany
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0842 Terajoules Ranked 65th. 10% more than Poland	0.0767 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Imports per capita	1,154.67 cu m Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Poland	260.91 cu m Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by gasworks > Per capita	0.026 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th.	0.045 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 73% more than Germany
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	3.19 Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Poland	0.49 Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	6.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Poland	2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	811,901 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 16 times more than Poland	49,729 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	2.91 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 12 times more than Poland	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.17 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	0.671 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	1.21 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	2.46 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 2 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	131.5 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	186.56 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 42% more than Germany
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	45.61 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 3 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	8.62 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 82% more than Poland	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	8.02 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 69% more than Poland	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.937 Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Poland	0.312 Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	77.3 Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Poland	11.9 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.61 Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Poland	0.16 Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	16.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Poland	3.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	14.7 Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Poland	3.9 Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	112.88 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 8th.	-233.755 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities	500 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 64% more than Poland	305 Terajoules Ranked 6th.
Including LNG > Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities > Per capita	6.07 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 7th.	7.99 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 6th. 32% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	20,000 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Poland	7,618 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 2 times more than Poland	0.582 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita	0.242 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 13th.	4.77 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th. 20 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	496,000 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Poland	78,027 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Poland	2.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.	0.671 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	14,000 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	25,600 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 83% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers	20 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	182 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 9 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	544,900 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Poland	98,333 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	100,000 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 7% more than Poland	93,843 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	18,843 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 38% more than Poland	13,647 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	10,000 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 8 times more than Poland	1,204 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.228 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.	0.358 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 57% more than Germany
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	9.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th. 8 times more than Poland	1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.76 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 7 times more than Poland	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Imports	3.42 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 9 times more than Poland	398,547 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	10,845 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 52% more than Poland	7,120 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	4.4 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 100 times more than Poland	0.044 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	41.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 4 times more than Poland	10.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	661,721 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Poland	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	2.75 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 7 times more than Poland	369,865 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	33.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Poland	9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	399.43 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 10th.	-26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	10.1 Terajoules Ranked 48th. 6 times more than Poland	1.67 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Poland	2.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million	182.27 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 57 times more than Poland	3.19 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	121.26 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 4 times more than Poland	31.55 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	9.84 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 8 times more than Poland	1.3 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	112.87 Terajoules Ranked 8th.	-233.741 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Proved reserves per capita	1,540.41 cu m Ranked 67th.	2,396.84 cu m Ranked 62nd. 56% more than Germany
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-506.37 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	220.91 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	16.37 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Poland	3.93 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by gasworks per million	25.77 Terajoules Ranked 6th.	44.94 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 74% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.412 Terajoules Ranked 51st.	0.928 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 2 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	10.85 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Poland	3.39 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by mining industry > Energy commodities per 1000	0.00607 Terajoules Ranked 7th.	0.00799 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 32% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by gasworks	2,111 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 23% more than Poland	1,715 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.412 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.	0.928 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd. 2 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	34,000 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	35,420 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 4% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	10.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Poland	3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.86 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Poland	229,354 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	22.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Poland	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	894,900 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 7 times more than Poland	129,549 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	1.21 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.	2.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 2 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita	0.182 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 61 times more than Poland	0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks	14,931 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 121 times more than Poland	123 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	121.26 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 21st. 4 times more than Poland	31.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Exports	362,714 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 218 times more than Poland	1,667 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	45.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 3 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	832,744 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 13 times more than Poland	63,897 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	10.1 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th. 6 times more than Poland	1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	45.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 3 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.76 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 7 times more than Poland	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	710,674 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 4 times more than Poland	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	84.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 67th. 10% more than Poland	76.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Total resources	6.95 million Terajoules Ranked 44th. 2 times more than Poland	2.93 million Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Proved > Reserves	175.6 billion cu m Ranked 46th. 7% more than Poland	164.8 billion cu m Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	110,000 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 5 times more than Poland	22,212 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	1.04 Ranked 23th. 3 times more than Poland	0.346 Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	85.9 Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Poland	13.2 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	8.3 Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Poland	1.3 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	3.19 Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Poland	0.49 Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers per 1000	0.000242 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	0.00477 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 20 times more than Germany
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.178 Ranked 37th. 74% more than Poland	0.102 Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	22.51 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Poland	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.228 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	0.358 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 56% more than Germany
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	41.48 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 4 times more than Poland	10.44 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-41,760 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	8,431 Terajoules Ranked 5th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	8,966 Terajoules Ranked 6th.	-8,990 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	2.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 12 times more than Poland	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Germany and Poland in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Germany & Poland

Definitions

Citation

Compare Germany and Poland in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Germany and Poland in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation