Energy > Coke Oven Coke Stats: compare key data on Latvia & United States

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Latvia	United States	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	1,000 ton Ranked 23th.	238,000 ton Ranked 4th. 238 times more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	3.04 ton Ranked 33th.	10.01 ton Ranked 25th. 3 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction	1,000 ton Ranked 38th.	1.1 million ton Ranked 2nd. 1098 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.43 ton Ranked 34th.	4.34 ton Ranked 11th. 10 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement	7,000 ton Ranked 41st.	1.38 million ton Ranked 6th. 197 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement per 1000	3.04 ton Ranked 30th.	4.67 ton Ranked 27th. 53% more than Latvia
Exports	1,000 ton Ranked 32nd.	1.58 million ton Ranked 5th. 1585 times more than Latvia
Exports > Per capita	0.428 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.	5.35 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th. 12 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability	7,000 ton Ranked 56th.	16.55 million ton Ranked 5th. 2364 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability > Per capita	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 47th.	55.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 18 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability per 1000	3.04 ton Ranked 46th.	55.99 ton Ranked 25th. 18 times more than Latvia
Imports	8,000 ton Ranked 47th.	3.2 million ton Ranked 2nd. 400 times more than Latvia
Imports > Per capita	3.48 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd.	10.8 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Latvia
Imports per 1000	3.48 ton Ranked 32nd.	10.84 ton Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability > Per capita	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.	9.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 3 times more than Latvia
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.	4.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 53% more than Latvia
Changes in stocks per million	434.69 ton Ranked 19th.	805.37 ton Ranked 16th. 85% more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.43 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th.	4.34 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 10 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	3.04 ton Ranked 38th.	10.01 ton Ranked 27th. 3 times more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry	7,000 ton Ranked 47th.	2.96 million ton Ranked 7th. 422 times more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th.	9.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	3.04 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.	9.98 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th. 3 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.	2.96 million ton Ranked 7th. 422 times more than Latvia
Statistical differences > Per capita	-427,715,996,578.271 ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 16th.	3.37 billion ton per 1e+15 people Ranked 10th.
Net inland availability	7,000 ton Ranked 52nd.	2.96 million ton Ranked 7th. 422 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability per 1000	3.04 ton Ranked 39th.	10.01 ton Ranked 27th. 3 times more than Latvia
Exports per 1000	0.428 ton Ranked 25th.	5.36 ton Ranked 13th. 13 times more than Latvia

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation