Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Latvia & United States

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Latvia	United States	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-10,000 ton Ranked 48th.	-1,607,000 ton Ranked 83th. 161 times more than Latvia
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-4.347 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 65th.	-5.422 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 72nd. 25% more than Latvia
Consumption by chemical industry	3,000 ton Ranked 40th.	4.18 million ton Ranked 1st. 1393 times more than Latvia
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.	14.1 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 11 times more than Latvia
Consumption by households and other consumers	13,000 ton Ranked 64th.	3.72 million ton Ranked 1st. 286 times more than Latvia
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	5.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.	12.54 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction	12,000 ton Ranked 109th.	9.03 million ton Ranked 2nd. 752 times more than Latvia
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	2,000 ton Ranked 35th.	153,000 ton Ranked 15th. 77 times more than Latvia
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	0.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th. 61% more than United States	0.516 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Conversion in thermal power plants	14,000 ton Ranked 112th.	21.66 million ton Ranked 1st. 1547 times more than Latvia
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	6.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th.	73.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 45th. 12 times more than Latvia
Conversion to other forms of energy	52,000 ton Ranked 98th.	21.66 million ton Ranked 1st. 416 times more than Latvia
Imports	244,000 ton Ranked 61st.	31.23 million ton Ranked 1st. 128 times more than Latvia
Imports > Per capita	106.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 1% more than United States	105.38 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	10.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 95th.	43.5 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 4 times more than Latvia
Bunkers > Per capita	75.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th. 14% more than United States	66.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 86th.	16.23 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 63th. 3 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability	25,000 ton Ranked 121st.	12.89 million ton Ranked 2nd. 516 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	3.91 ton Ranked 26th.	12.57 ton Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Latvia
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	0.83 ton Ranked 35th. 60% more than United States	0.518 ton Ranked 37th.
Bunkers	174,000 ton Ranked 43th.	19.72 million ton Ranked 2nd. 113 times more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry	8,000 ton Ranked 33th.	36,000 ton Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Latvia
Consumption by energy sector	1,000 ton Ranked 70th.	370,000 ton Ranked 27th. 370 times more than Latvia
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 66th.	1.25 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 57th. 3 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other consumers	9,000 ton Ranked 50th.	3.72 million ton Ranked 1st. 413 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	3.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.	12.54 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Latvia
Bunkers per 1000	75.64 ton Ranked 20th. 13% more than United States	66.73 ton Ranked 21st.
Changes in stocks per million	-4,346.858 ton Ranked 65th.	-5,437.935 ton Ranked 71st. 25% more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	3.29 ton Ranked 20th. 27 times more than United States	0.122 ton Ranked 30th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.22 ton Ranked 82nd.	16.28 ton Ranked 60th. 3 times more than Latvia
Imports per 1000	106.06 ton Ranked 32nd. About the same as United States	105.7 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.29 ton Ranked 34th.	14.14 ton Ranked 6th. 11 times more than Latvia
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.435 ton Ranked 64th.	1.25 ton Ranked 55th. 3 times more than Latvia
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	6.09 ton Ranked 92nd.	73.29 ton Ranked 40th. 12 times more than Latvia
Net inland availability per 1000	10.87 ton Ranked 88th.	43.64 ton Ranked 45th. 4 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	5.22 ton Ranked 86th.	30.54 ton Ranked 46th. 6 times more than Latvia
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	22.6 ton Ranked 72nd.	73.29 ton Ranked 43th. 3 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	5.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 90th.	30.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th. 6 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction	12,000 ton Ranked 109th.	4.81 million ton Ranked 4th. 401 times more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	3.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 27 times more than United States	0.121 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	0.83 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 61% more than United States	0.516 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	0.83 ton Ranked 26th. 60% more than United States	0.518 ton Ranked 29th.
Consumption by transportation industry	2,000 ton Ranked 47th.	153,000 ton Ranked 18th. 77 times more than Latvia
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	5.65 ton Ranked 30th.	12.57 ton Ranked 15th. 2 times more than Latvia
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	22.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th.	73.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 48th. 3 times more than Latvia

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation