Energy > Steam and hot water Stats: compare key data on Latvia & United States

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Latvia	United States	HISTORY
Consumption by chemical industry per million	3.04 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	223.63 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 73 times more than Latvia
Consumption by energy sector per million	103.46 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	112.89 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 9% more than Latvia
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	10.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 109 times more than United States	0.097 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	10.58 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 109 times more than United States	0.0969 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.297 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	0.365 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 23% more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry per million	1.74 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	13.39 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 8 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other consumers	5,821 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	28,641 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 5 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	2.53 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 26 times more than United States	0.0969 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	673 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	37,799 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 56 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.293 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 2 times more than United States	0.128 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants per 1000	7.16 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 26 times more than United States	0.276 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants per 1000	6.38 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 8 times more than United States	0.845 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Net inland availability > Per capita	10.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 24 times more than United States	0.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.
Station use and station loss per million	370.79 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than United States	169.04 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-2,489,626,556.016 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 8th.	798.13 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 6th.
Consumption by energy sector	238 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	33,362 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 140 times more than Latvia
Gross > Production > Per capita	13.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 16 times more than United States	0.843 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants > Per capita	7.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 26 times more than United States	0.276 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants > Per capita	6.38 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 8 times more than United States	0.843 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.
Gross > Production > Thermal power plants	14,677 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	249,773 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 17 times more than Latvia
Consumption by chemical industry	7 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	66,085 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 9441 times more than Latvia
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.	0.223 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 74 times more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction	684 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	107,842 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 158 times more than Latvia
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	2.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 26 times more than United States	0.097 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.293 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 2 times more than United States	0.128 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	5,033 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	29,973 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 6 times more than Latvia
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses > Per capita	2.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 22 times more than United States	0.101 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	13.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 20 times more than United States	0.674 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	24,336 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	28,641 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 18% more than Latvia
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.297 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.	0.364 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 23% more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.74 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 13th.	13.35 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 9th. 8 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability	30,291 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	199,818 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Latvia
Station use and station loss > Per capita	0.371 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than United States	0.169 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th.
Gross > Production > Pure heating plants	16,467 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	77,097 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 5 times more than Latvia
Consumption by iron and steel industry	4 Terajoules Ranked 14th.	3,958 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 990 times more than Latvia
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.103 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th.	0.113 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 10% more than Latvia
Net inland availability	25,020 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	136,483 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 5 times more than Latvia
Gross inland availability per 1000	13.17 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 19 times more than United States	0.676 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Net inland availability per 1000	10.88 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 24 times more than United States	0.462 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Station use and station loss	853 Terajoules Ranked 10th.	49,955 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 59 times more than Latvia
Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per 1000	2.19 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 22 times more than United States	0.101 Terajoules Ranked 23th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation