Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Nigeria & Poland

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Nigeria	Poland
Consumption	5.03 billion cu m Ranked 42nd.	14.38 billion cu m Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Nigeria
Consumption > Per capita	83,962.76 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.	425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 5 times more than Nigeria
Consumption per capita	81.21 cu m Ranked 35th.	428.03 cu m Ranked 41st. 5 times more than Nigeria
Imports	0.0 Ranked 160th.	37.38 billion cu m Ranked 13th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	24,596 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 3 times more than Poland	9,004 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	3.4 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 78 times more than Poland	0.0437 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	2.69 Terajoules Ranked 84th.	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th. 6 times more than Nigeria
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	2 Ranked 26th. 5 times more than Poland	0.4 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres	20.6 Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Poland	4.4 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.77 Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Poland	0.16 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	0.151 Ranked 38th. 31% more than Poland	0.115 Ranked 42nd.
Proved reserves	5.15 trillion cu m Ranked 8th. 56 times more than Poland	92 billion cu m Ranked 53th.
Reserves	4.01 trillion cubic feet Ranked 6th. 26 times more than Poland	154.4 billion cubic feet Ranked 31st.
Reserves per capita	28,706.34 cubic feet Ranked 22nd. 7 times more than Poland	4,045.54 cubic feet Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	0.435 Terajoules Ranked 81st.	9.69 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 22 times more than Nigeria
Proved > Reserves per capita	32,847.49 cu m Ranked 27th. 8 times more than Poland	4,315.98 cu m Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	1.44 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 19 times more than Poland	0.0767 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Imports per capita	0.0 Ranked 103th.	260.91 cu m Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.224 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 74th.	2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 12 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	129,375 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 3 times more than Poland	49,729 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.176 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 34% more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.0196 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	0.671 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 34 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	267.91 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 44% more than Poland	186.56 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	2.69 Terajoules Ranked 84th.	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th. 6 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	16.42 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Poland	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	6.09 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 29% more than Poland	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.945 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st. 2% more than Poland	0.928 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	133,571 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Poland	35,420 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.43 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 75th.	3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 8 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	60,783 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	129,549 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 2 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	0.915 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 80th.	1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 77th. 42% more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	375,990 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 51% more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	37,397 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Poland	7,120 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	3.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 76 times more than Poland	0.044 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	375,990 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 51% more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Gross > Production	2.29 million Terajoules Ranked 15th. 13 times more than Poland	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	1,421.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 19 times more than Poland	76.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Total resources	200.96 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 69 times more than Poland	2.93 million Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	105.14 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 17th.	-26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 35th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.136 Ranked 38th. 33% more than Poland	0.102 Ranked 42nd.
Proved reserves per capita	29,528.81 cu m Ranked 26th. 12 times more than Poland	2,396.84 cu m Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.957 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 3% more than Poland	0.928 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.435 Terajoules Ranked 74th.	3.39 Terajoules Ranked 47th. 8 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.0327 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	0.582 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 18 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.937 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 5 times more than Poland	0.2 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.227 Terajoules Ranked 73th.	2.58 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 11 times more than Nigeria
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	18.5 Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Poland	3.9 Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.174 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th. 36% more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	130,835 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 17 times more than Poland	7,618 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.032 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.	0.582 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 18 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.019 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.	0.671 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 35 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	2,736 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	25,600 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 9 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	31,620 Terajoules Ranked 47th.	98,333 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 3 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Exports	474,667 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 285 times more than Poland	1,667 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	2.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 86th.	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th. 6 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	129,375 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 2 times more than Poland	63,897 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.915 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 84th.	1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 76th. 83% more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	2.66 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 86th.	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th. 6 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Net > Production	850,657.8 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 5 times more than Poland	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	60,783 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	369,865 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 6 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	0.43 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 83th.	9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 23 times more than Nigeria
Proved > Reserves	5.25 trillion cu m Ranked 8th. 32 times more than Poland	164.8 billion cu m Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	4,567 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	22,212 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 5 times more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	0.927 Terajoules Ranked 83th.	1.67 Terajoules Ranked 76th. 81% more than Nigeria
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	0.927 Terajoules Ranked 79th.	1.3 Terajoules Ranked 76th. 41% more than Nigeria
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.77 Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Poland	0.16 Ranked 45th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Nigeria and Poland in

Agriculture	Environment	Military
Background	Geography	People
Conflict	Government	Religion
Cost of living	Health	Sports
Crime	Import	Terrorism
Culture	Industry	Transport
Disasters	Labor	Travel
Economy	Language	Weather
Education	Lifestyle
Energy	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Nigeria & Poland

Definitions

Citation

Compare Nigeria and Poland in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Nigeria and Poland in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation