SOURCE
United Nations, Monthly Bulletin of Statistics, April 2001
 |
|
| Home | Encyclopedia | Statistics | Countries A-Z | Flags | Maps | Education | Forum | FAQ | About |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
del.icio.us| COMMENTARY |
|
Jay 28th November 2009 |
I totally agree with you Murshed. The constitution of marriage is most definitely positive aspect of society; it passes on culture capital from one generation to the next. Unfortunately, the concept of marriage has somewhat changed within our post-modern societies, and is now associated with material things. It’s a shame because history itself has shown the marriage is great aspect of society with the exception of the last 80 years or so. No one’s saying its perfect but its good. |
|
Murshed 5th August 2009 |
Marriage has been considered as one of the building pillars of society. if it's rate declines, the social norm of the people may decline in any rate. Sex must be constrained within a certain limit, and marriage conserves it to a certain extent. A modern state may politically exist as long as the economic driving force exists, however, not a socio-political state which ensures a longer state-life than the former one. |
|
Ganesh .R 20th May 2005 |
I'd like to see India's and China's stats on this. |
There are 4 more (non-authoritative) comments on this page
|
Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
|
Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |
Feeds |
Contact© Copyright NationMaster.com 2003-2010. All Rights Reserved. Usage implies agreement with terms.