|
SEARCH ALL
|
FACTS & STATISTICS
Advanced view
|
|
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:
|
|
|
|
SOURCE
GLOBAL TERRORISM:
AN OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS
Monty G. Marshall
INSCR
Integrated Network for Societal Conflict Research
CIDCM
Center for International Development and Conflict Management
University of Maryland, College Park
and the
Center for Systemic Peace
Draft: September 11, 2002
DEFINITION
The Collective Political Violence (CPV) scale reflects general, ordinal levels of state, non-state,
and communal group violence within a particular country during the 1990s. The scale also
reflects whether the episode(s) of collective political violence resulted in an excessive targeting
of civilians. The term “excessive targeting of civilians� focuses on the deliberate and systematic
use of violence against non-combatant populations in situations of political conflict by either
state or non-state actor groups that can be considered in excess of the general suffering of
civilian populations that is associated with warfare.
Terrorism Statistics > Collective Political Violence in the 1990s with Excessive Targeting of Civilians (most recent) by country
Showing latest available data.
| Rank |
Countries
|
Amount
|
|
= 1
|
Rwanda: |
4 |
|
|
= 1
|
Sudan: |
4 |
|
|
= 1
|
Angola: |
4 |
|
|
= 4
|
Croatia: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Congo, Democratic Republic of the: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Sierra Leone: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
India: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Afghanistan: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Algeria: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Sri Lanka: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Azerbaijan: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Ethiopia: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Indonesia: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Burma: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Iraq: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Burundi: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Philippines: |
3 |
|
|
= 4
|
Somalia: |
3 |
|
|
= 20
|
Senegal: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Nigeria: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Chad: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Liberia: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Kenya: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Pakistan: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
China: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Colombia: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Lebanon: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Egypt: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Morocco: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Guatemala: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Peru: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Iran: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Russia: |
2 |
|
|
= 20
|
Cambodia: |
2 |
|
|
= 36
|
Macedonia, Republic of: |
1 |
|
|
= 36
|
Brazil: |
1 |
|
|
= 36
|
Bhutan: |
1 |
|
|
= 36
|
Togo: |
1 |
|
|
= 36
|
Namibia: |
1 |
|
|
= 41
|
Netherlands: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Uruguay: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Kazakhstan: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Sweden: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Trinidad and Tobago: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Benin: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Mongolia: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Belarus: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Poland: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Comoros: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Korea, North: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Costa Rica: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Luxembourg: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Central African Republic: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Mauritius: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Cuba: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Nicaragua: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Denmark: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Qatar: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Dominican Republic: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Jamaica: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Ireland: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Kuwait: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Equatorial Guinea: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Lesotho: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Finland: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Libya: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Gambia, The: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Malawi: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Gabon: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Oman: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Haiti: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Norway: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Hungary: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
New Zealand: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Iceland: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Portugal: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
CĂ´te d'Ivoire: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Slovenia: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Armenia: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
United Arab Emirates: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Austria: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Burkina Faso: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Belgium: |
0 |
|
|
= 41
|
Swaziland: |
0 |
|
| |
Weighted average: |
1.1 |
|
DEFINITION: The Collective Political Violence (CPV) scale reflects general, ordinal levels of state, non-state,
and communal group violence within a particular country during the 1990s. The scale also
reflects whether the episode(s) of collective political violence resulted in an excessive targeting
of civilians. The term “excessive targeting of civilians� focuses on the deliberate and systematic
use of violence against non-combatant populations in situations of political conflict by either
state or non-state actor groups that can be considered in excess of the general suffering of
civilian populations that is associated with warfare.
SOURCE: GLOBAL TERRORISM:
AN OVERVIEW AND ANALYSIS
Monty G. Marshall
INSCR
Integrated Network for Societal Conflict Research
CIDCM
Center for International Development and Conflict Management
University of Maryland, College Park
and the
Center for Systemic Peace
Draft: September 11, 2002
See also
Related links:
|