| STAT | Norway | Sweden | HISTORY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted net national income > Constant 2000 US$ |
$221.16 billion
Ranked 24th. |
$326.48 billion
Ranked 20th. 48% more than Norway |
|
| CO2 Emissions per 1000 |
7.74
Ranked 33th. 42% more than Sweden |
5.44
Ranked 50th. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from electricity and heat production, total > Million metric tons |
13.84
Ranked 68th. 31% more than Sweden |
10.58
Ranked 75th. |
|
| Current issues | water pollution; acid rain damaging forests and adversely affecting lakes, threatening fish stocks; air pollution from vehicle emissions | acid rain damage to soils and lakes; pollution of the North Sea and the Baltic Sea |
|
| Ecological footprint |
4.8
Ranked 4th. |
7.53
Ranked 10th. 57% more than Norway |
|
| Marine fish catch |
2.55 million tons
Ranked 8th. 7 times more than Sweden |
343,996 tons
Ranked 32nd. |
|
| Municipal waste generation |
620 kgs per person per year
Ranked 6th. 38% more than Sweden |
450 kgs per person per year
Ranked 16th. |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Air pollution |
23.78
Ranked 53th. 51% more than Sweden |
15.76
Ranked 58th. |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Air quality |
76.22
Ranked 7th. |
84.24
Ranked 2nd. 11% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Clean water |
81.25
Ranked 4th. |
90.79
Ranked 2nd. 12% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Drinking water pollution |
9.09
Ranked 57th. 2 times more than Sweden |
4.49
Ranked 59th. |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Water pollution |
18.75
Ranked 56th. 2 times more than Sweden |
9.21
Ranked 58th. |
|
| Proportion of land area under protection |
16.33%
Ranked 96th. 12% more than Sweden |
14.53%
Ranked 107th. |
|
| Total renewable water resources |
381.4 cu km
Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Sweden |
179 cu km
Ranked 4th. |
|
| Transport CO2 emission index |
3,876
Ranked 9th. 75% more than Sweden |
2,212.43
Ranked 6th. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from electricity and heat production, total > Million metric tons per million |
2.79
Ranked 46th. 2 times more than Sweden |
1.12
Ranked 75th. |
|
| Water > Freshwater pollution |
0.2 tons/cubic km
Ranked 51st. |
0.62 tons/cubic km
Ranked 39th. 3 times more than Norway |
|
| Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita |
20.3 km²
per 1,000 people
Ranked 29th. |
30.5 km²
per 1,000 people
Ranked 23th. 50% more than Norway |
|
| Municipal waste generation per million |
138.05 kgs per person per year
Ranked 2nd. 3 times more than Sweden |
50.72 kgs per person per year
Ranked 8th. |
|
| Water pollution > Organic water pollutant > BOD emissions > Kg per day |
50,535.34
Ranked 32nd. |
97,621.99
Ranked 23th. 93% more than Norway |
|
| Waste > Local garbage collected |
2.27 million tonnes
Ranked 36th. |
4.49 million tonnes
Ranked 26th. 98% more than Norway |
|
| Marine fish catch per 1000 |
571.77 tons
Ranked 2nd. 15 times more than Sweden |
38.84 tons
Ranked 16th. |
|
| Water > Severe water stress |
0.4
Ranked 89th. |
0.6
Ranked 86th. 50% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Noise and light pollution |
26.67
Ranked 55th. |
29.05
Ranked 53th. 9% more than Norway |
|
| Endangered species > Mammal species > Number |
7
Ranked 117th. 7 times more than Sweden |
1
Ranked 190th. |
|
| Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened |
7
Ranked 127th. 7 times more than Sweden |
1
Ranked 197th. |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Drinking water quality |
90.91
Ranked 3rd. |
95.51
Ranked 1st. 5% more than Norway |
|
| CO2 emissions > Kt |
45,014.61 kt
Ranked 59th. |
52,666.61 kt
Ranked 52nd. 17% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Pollution index |
25.44
Ranked 55th. 48% more than Sweden |
17.23
Ranked 59th. |
|
| Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural |
100
Ranked 28th. The same as Sweden |
100
Ranked 10th. |
|
| National parks > Number of parks |
36
Ranked 4th. 29% more than Sweden |
28
Ranked 5th. |
|
| Emissions > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita |
9.07
Ranked 37th. 69% more than Sweden |
5.38
Ranked 65th. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita |
11.7
Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Sweden |
5.6
Ranked 64th. |
|
| Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened |
4
Ranked 181st. The same as Sweden |
4
Ranked 171st. |
|
| Carbon efficiency |
0.74 CO2 emissions/$ GDP
Ranked 97th. 6% more than Sweden |
0.7 CO2 emissions/$ GDP
Ranked 100th. |
|
| CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 |
9.86 kt
Ranked 27th. 68% more than Sweden |
5.88 kt
Ranked 56th. |
|
| Endangered species > Bird species |
2
Ranked 177th. |
3
Ranked 160th. 50% more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted net national income > Constant 2000 US$ per capita |
$47,835.34
Ranked 2nd. 32% more than Sweden |
$36,156.21
Ranked 8th. |
|
| National parks > Proportion of country area |
6.3%
Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Sweden |
1.4%
Ranked 24th. |
|
| Total renewable water resources per million |
82.5 cu km
Ranked 2nd. 4 times more than Sweden |
19.82 cu km
Ranked 5th. |
|
| SO2 emissions per populated area |
350 thousand metric tons/squ
Ranked 87th. |
770 thousand metric tons/squ
Ranked 60th. 2 times more than Norway |
|
| Waste > Hazardous waste created |
1.34 million tonnes
Ranked 21st. |
2.06 million tonnes
Ranked 18th. 54% more than Norway |
|
| Waste > Local garbage collected per thousand people |
469.9 tonnes
Ranked 31st. |
482.44 tonnes
Ranked 28th. 3% more than Norway |
|
| Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened |
19
Ranked 119th. 58% more than Sweden |
12
Ranked 148th. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt |
57,186.86
Ranked 56th. 9% more than Sweden |
52,515.11
Ranked 59th. |
|
| CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita |
9.86 kt
per 1,000 people
Ranked 31st. 68% more than Sweden |
5.88 kt
per 1,000 people
Ranked 60th. |
|
| Endangered species > Fish species > Number |
14
Ranked 111th. 17% more than Sweden |
12
Ranked 120th. |
|
| Pollution > Organic water pollutant > BOD emissions > Kg per day |
46,923.89
Ranked 39th. |
96,883.4
Ranked 25th. 2 times more than Norway |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Waste management dissatisfaction |
23.48
Ranked 53th. 32% more than Sweden |
17.76
Ranked 57th. |
|
| Pollution > Climate change > Agrees climate change is caused by human activity |
47%
Ranked 95th. |
64%
Ranked 39th. 36% more than Norway |
|
| Water > Percent of water resources used |
0.769%
Ranked 80th. |
1.5%
Ranked 75th. 95% more than Norway |
|
| Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number |
2
Ranked 140th. |
3
Ranked 120th. 50% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Ozone depleting substance consumption |
-0.16
Ranked 163th. |
418.2
Ranked 60th. |
|
| NOx emissions per populated area |
0.26 thousand metric tons/squ
Ranked 67th. |
0.27 thousand metric tons/squ
Ranked 60th. 4% more than Norway |
|
| Water > Dissolved oxygen concentration |
9.16 mls/litre
Ranked 35th. |
9.27 mls/litre
Ranked 32nd. 1% more than Norway |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 |
11.7
Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Sweden |
5.6
Ranked 64th. |
|
| Forest area > Sq. km |
93,870 km²
Ranked 56th. |
275,280 km²
Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Norway |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP |
$0.18
Ranked 168th. 38% more than Sweden |
$0.13
Ranked 174th. |
|
| Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural |
100
Ranked 29th. The same as Sweden |
100
Ranked 12th. |
|
| Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kt |
42,722.24
Ranked 61st. |
49,207.52
Ranked 55th. 15% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Clean, tidy cities |
63.24
Ranked 13th. |
75.66
Ranked 6th. 20% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Ozone depleting substance consumption per million people |
-0.0323
Ranked 162nd. |
47.63
Ranked 73th. |
|
| Water > Availability |
57.71 thousand cubic metres
Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Sweden |
15.91 thousand cubic metres
Ranked 33th. |
|
| Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural |
100
Ranked 29th. The same as Sweden |
100
Ranked 9th. |
|
| Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened |
3
Ranked 151st. |
5
Ranked 126th. 67% more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted net national income > Current US$ per capita |
$75,530.65
Ranked 1st. 50% more than Sweden |
$50,462.53
Ranked 5th. |
|
| Waste water treatment expenditure |
$92.10
Ranked 7th. 45% more than Sweden |
$63.50
Ranked 10th. |
|
| Waste > Population served by local garbage collection |
99%
Ranked 20th. |
100%
Ranked 14th. 1% more than Norway |
|
| National parks > Total area |
24,060
Ranked 2nd. 4 times more than Sweden |
6,326
Ranked 11th. |
|
| Biodiversity > Number |
1.31
Ranked 108th. 4 times more than Sweden |
0.3
Ranked 157th. |
|
| Adjusted net national income > Current US$ |
$374.11 billion
Ranked 24th. |
$476.83 billion
Ranked 21st. 27% more than Norway |
|
| Water > Freshwater internal flow per capita |
75,037.18 cubic metres
Ranked 1st. 4 times more than Sweden |
17,488.38 cubic metres
Ranked 4th. |
|
| Water > Freshwater internal flow |
362.33 billion cubic metres
Ranked 1st. 2 times more than Sweden |
162.62 billion cubic metres
Ranked 4th. |
|
| Pollution > Climate change > Climate change awareness |
97%
Ranked 6th. 1% more than Sweden |
96%
Ranked 8th. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) |
53,895.68
Ranked 31st. |
66,271.36
Ranked 26th. 23% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Urban comfort > Low pollution |
81.08
Ranked 8th. |
87.5
Ranked 3rd. 8% more than Norway |
|
| Waste > Hazardous waste created per thousand people |
280.29 tonnes
Ranked 12th. 25% more than Sweden |
223.8 tonnes
Ranked 14th. |
|
| Protected area |
6.8%
Ranked 62nd. |
9%
Ranked 45th. 32% more than Norway |
|
| Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum |
1.31
Ranked 113th. 4 times more than Sweden |
0.298
Ranked 162nd. |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Dirty, untidy cities |
36.76
Ranked 47th. 51% more than Sweden |
24.34
Ranked 54th. |
|
| Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP |
$0.22
Ranked 164th. 29% more than Sweden |
$0.17
Ranked 167th. |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Free of noise and light pollution |
73.33
Ranked 5th. 3% more than Sweden |
70.95
Ranked 7th. |
|
| Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources > Total > Billion cubic meters |
382
Ranked 22nd. 2 times more than Sweden |
171
Ranked 41st. |
|
| Acidification |
15.96%
Ranked 22nd. |
34.37%
Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Norway |
|
| Emissions > Methane emissions > Kt of CO2 equivalent |
12,080
Ranked 61st. 87% more than Sweden |
6,460
Ranked 78th. |
|
| Water > Net freshwater supplied by water supply industry per capita |
178.05 cubic metres
Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Sweden |
80.56 cubic metres
Ranked 22nd. |
|
| Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita > Cubic meters |
80,113.89
Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Sweden |
18,547.37
Ranked 36th. |
|
| Pollution > PM10, country level > Micrograms per cubic meter |
16.12
Ranked 147th. 57% more than Sweden |
10.24
Ranked 173th. |
|
| Wetlands of intl importance > Area |
70 thousand hectares
Ranked 71st. |
515 thousand hectares
Ranked 28th. 7 times more than Norway |
|
| Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number |
1,795
Ranked 16th. |
4,622
Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Norway |
|
| CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 PPP $ of GDP |
0.29 kg/PPP$
Ranked 95th. 32% more than Sweden |
0.22 kg/PPP$
Ranked 115th. |
|
| Proportion of land and marine area under protection |
12.23%
Ranked 100th. |
13.87%
Ranked 92nd. 13% more than Norway |
|
| Endangered species protection |
87%
Ranked 43th. |
100%
Ranked 8th. 15% more than Norway |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from other sectors, excluding residential buildings and commercial and public services > Million metric tons |
2.12
Ranked 42nd. 3 times more than Sweden |
0.64
Ranked 69th. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) per million people |
15.3
Ranked 7th. 96% more than Sweden |
7.82
Ranked 19th. |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Urban discomfort from pollution |
18.92
Ranked 52nd. 51% more than Sweden |
12.5
Ranked 57th. |
|
| Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million |
0.274
Ranked 100th. 8 times more than Sweden |
0.0323
Ranked 172nd. |
|
| Pollution > Carbon Dioxide per capita |
8
Ranked 14th. 33% more than Sweden |
6
Ranked 26th. |
|
| Water > Population connected to wastewater treatment |
79%
Ranked 8th. |
86%
Ranked 11th. 9% more than Norway |
|
| Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural |
100%
Ranked 29th. The same as Sweden |
100%
Ranked 11th. |
|
| Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban |
100
Ranked 38th. The same as Sweden |
100
Ranked 15th. |
|
| Sea > Blue Flag beaches per million people |
0.828
Ranked 21st. |
4.09
Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Norway |
|
| Commitment to Development Index (environment) |
3.2
Ranked 26th. |
7.3
Ranked 5th. 2 times more than Norway |
|
| Waste water treatment expenditure per million |
$20.51
Ranked 1st. 3 times more than Sweden |
$7.16
Ranked 6th. |
|
| Municipal waste treatment expenditure per million |
$2.20
Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Sweden |
$0.95
Ranked 9th. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) |
74.81
Ranked 18th. 2% more than Sweden |
73.34
Ranked 19th. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Carbon dioxide (CO2) > CO2 emissions per thousand people |
9.3
Ranked 14th. 65% more than Sweden |
5.64
Ranked 32nd. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Methane (CH4) > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) |
4,345.84
Ranked 29th. |
5,254.56
Ranked 28th. 21% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Carbon dioxide (CO2) > CO2 emissions |
45,454.99
Ranked 28th. |
52,883.68
Ranked 23th. 16% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Methane (CH4) > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) per thousand people |
0.889
Ranked 21st. 59% more than Sweden |
0.56
Ranked 38th. |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Waste management satisfaction |
76.52
Ranked 7th. |
82.24
Ranked 3rd. 7% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Climate change > Perceived as threat |
43%
Ranked 75th. |
56%
Ranked 43th. 30% more than Norway |
|
| Emissions > Nitrous oxide emissions > Thousand metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
4,680
Ranked 78th. |
6,070
Ranked 73th. 30% more than Norway |
|
| Wildness |
28.71%
Ranked 39th. |
31.41%
Ranked 37th. 9% more than Norway |
|
| Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 |
20.3 km²
Ranked 29th. |
30.49 km²
Ranked 21st. 50% more than Norway |
|
| Threatened species > Mammal |
4
Ranked 143th. |
5
Ranked 121st. 25% more than Norway |
|
| Water > Population supplied by water supply industry |
90%
Ranked 22nd. 6% more than Sweden |
85%
Ranked 27th. |
|
| Water > Net freshwater supplied by water supply industry to households per capita |
77.04 cubic metres
Ranked 5th. 47% more than Sweden |
52.25 cubic metres
Ranked 17th. |
|
| Municipal waste treatment expenditure |
$10.00
Ranked 11th. 18% more than Sweden |
$8.50
Ranked 17th. |
|
| World Heritage Sites (environmental) |
1
Ranked 47th. The same as Sweden |
1
Ranked 74th. |
|
| Known mammal species |
54
Ranked 132nd. |
60
Ranked 126th. 11% more than Norway |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from residential buildings and commercial and public services > Million metric tons |
1.17
Ranked 77th. |
2.18
Ranked 67th. 86% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Organic water pollutant > BOD emissions > Kg per day per worker |
0.184
Ranked 20th. 29% more than Sweden |
0.142
Ranked 53th. |
|
| Freshwater > Annual freshwater withdrawals > Total > Billion cubic meters |
2.19
Ranked 71st. |
2.96
Ranked 62nd. 35% more than Norway |
|
| Sea > Blue Flag beaches |
4
Ranked 28th. |
38
Ranked 13th. 10 times more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 |
10,565
Ranked 60th. |
12,713
Ranked 53th. 20% more than Norway |
|
| Breeding birds threatened |
0.82%
Ranked 120th. 2% more than Sweden |
0.8%
Ranked 121st. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 |
0.651
Ranked 53th. |
1.02
Ranked 45th. 56% more than Norway |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 |
7.75
Ranked 11th. 90% more than Sweden |
4.07
Ranked 34th. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt |
14,264.63
Ranked 54th. 4 times more than Sweden |
3,336.97
Ranked 80th. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt |
3,182.96
Ranked 60th. |
9,519.53
Ranked 48th. 3 times more than Norway |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 |
2.92
Ranked 23th. 8 times more than Sweden |
0.356
Ranked 78th. |
|
| Climate change > Other greenhouse gas emissions, HFC, PFC and SF6 > Thousand metric tons of CO2 equivalent per million |
372.86
Ranked 15th. 59% more than Sweden |
234.38
Ranked 35th. |
|
| Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number |
17
Ranked 47th. |
477
Ranked 4th. 28 times more than Norway |
|
| Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban |
100
Ranked 31st. The same as Sweden |
100
Ranked 13th. |
|
| Emissions > Other greenhouse gas emissions > HFC > PFC and SF6 > Thousand metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
1,770
Ranked 25th. 9% more than Sweden |
1,620
Ranked 26th. |
|
| Urban SO2 concentration |
5.47 micrograms/m3
Ranked 133th. 5% more than Sweden |
5.23 micrograms/m3
Ranked 135th. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Nitrous oxide (N2O) > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) per million people |
627.55
Ranked 27th. |
751.98
Ranked 18th. 20% more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > Current US$ |
$67.78 billion
Ranked 19th. 11% more than Sweden |
$61.28 billion
Ranked 21st. |
|
| Sustainability-satisfying companies |
33.1%
Ranked 8th. |
56.6%
Ranked 7th. 71% more than Norway |
|
| Marine areas under protection |
10
Ranked 37th. |
46
Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Norway |
|
| Water > Surface and Groundwater inflow |
11.68 billion cubic metres
Ranked 10th. |
12.5 billion cubic metres
Ranked 9th. 7% more than Norway |
|
| Water > Population connected to wastewater collecting system |
83%
Ranked 17th. |
86%
Ranked 13th. 4% more than Norway |
|
| Water > Proportion of marine area under protection |
2.83%
Ranked 89th. |
10.23%
Ranked 54th. 4 times more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted net savings > Including particulate emission damage > Current US$ |
$73.44 billion
Ranked 14th. |
$100.31 billion
Ranked 11th. 37% more than Norway |
|
| Environmental agreement compliance |
6.06
Ranked 7th. |
6.54
Ranked 3rd. 8% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 |
2.37
Ranked 30th. 65% more than Sweden |
1.44
Ranked 61st. |
|
| Emissions > PM10 > Country level > Micrograms per cubic meter |
14.8
Ranked 159th. 27% more than Sweden |
11.62
Ranked 168th. |
|
| Known mammal species per million |
11.9
Ranked 74th. 77% more than Sweden |
6.72
Ranked 98th. |
|
| Wetlands of intl importance > Area per million |
15.42 thousand hectares
Ranked 46th. |
57.7 thousand hectares
Ranked 24th. 4 times more than Norway |
|
| Areas under protection per million |
38.99
Ranked 20th. |
405.44
Ranked 2nd. 10 times more than Norway |
|
| Water > Salinisation |
0.61
Ranked 140th. |
77.56
Ranked 138th. 127 times more than Norway |
|
| Kyoto Protocol signatories > Signed and ratified > Date | 4/29/1998 | 4/29/1998 | |
| Marine areas under protection per million |
2.19
Ranked 18th. |
5.13
Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Norway |
|
| Areas under protection |
178
Ranked 35th. |
3,632
Ranked 5th. 20 times more than Norway |
|
| Fertiliser > Consumption |
2,257.71 hundred grams/hectare
Ranked 26th. 2 times more than Sweden |
1,006.47 hundred grams/hectare
Ranked 53th. |
|
| Urban NO2 concentration |
49.65 micrograms/m3
Ranked 72nd. 67% more than Sweden |
29.68 micrograms/m3
Ranked 121st. |
|
| Non-wildness |
3.89%
Ranked 60th. |
7.48%
Ranked 44th. 92% more than Norway |
|
| Water pollution > Water pollution > Wood industry > % of total BOD emissions |
5.63%
Ranked 16th. 3% more than Sweden |
5.44%
Ranked 14th. |
|
| Known breeding bird species per million |
53.11
Ranked 29th. 83% more than Sweden |
29.02
Ranked 54th. |
|
| Expenditure pollution control as % of GDP |
1.2% of GDP
Ranked 9th. The same as Sweden |
1.2% of GDP
Ranked 8th. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from residential buildings and commercial and public services > Million metric tons per million |
0.236
Ranked 59th. 2% more than Sweden |
0.231
Ranked 61st. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from residential buildings and commercial and public services > % of total fuel combustion |
3.07%
Ranked 113th. |
4.86%
Ranked 94th. 58% more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net forest depletion > Current US$ |
0.0
Ranked 154th. |
0.0
Ranked 94th. |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted net savings > Excluding particulate emission damage > % of GNI |
16.23%
Ranked 27th. |
20.46%
Ranked 12th. 26% more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ |
$71.99 billion
Ranked 7th. |
0.0
Ranked 128th. |
|
| Water pollution > Water pollution > Chemical industry > % of total BOD emissions |
7.51%
Ranked 43th. |
9.91%
Ranked 34th. 32% more than Norway |
|
| Water pollution > Water pollution > Textile industry > % of total BOD emissions |
2.05%
Ranked 53th. 47% more than Sweden |
1.39%
Ranked 53th. |
|
| Water pollution > Organic water pollutant > BOD emissions > Kg per day per worker |
0.2
Ranked 13th. 43% more than Sweden |
0.14
Ranked 46th. |
|
| Pollution > Water pollution, food industry > % of total BOD emissions |
19.08%
Ranked 24th. 2 times more than Sweden |
8.64%
Ranked 58th. |
|
| Pollution > Water pollution, other industry > % of total BOD emissions |
44.18%
Ranked 17th. |
54.85%
Ranked 4th. 24% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Water pollution, paper and pulp industry > % of total BOD emissions |
12.13%
Ranked 4th. 2% more than Sweden |
11.89%
Ranked 5th. |
|
| Freshwater > Annual freshwater withdrawals > Agriculture > % of total freshwater withdrawal |
10.5%
Ranked 122nd. 20% more than Sweden |
8.78%
Ranked 124th. |
|
| Climate change > GHG net emissions/removals by LUCF > Mt of CO2 equivalent |
-25.328
Ranked 28th. |
-41.638
Ranked 35th. 64% more than Norway |
|
| Oil rents > % of GDP |
10.78%
Ranked 24th. |
0.0
Ranked 94th. |
|
| Freshwater > Annual freshwater withdrawals > Industry > % of total freshwater withdrawal |
66.67%
Ranked 10th. 23% more than Sweden |
54.39%
Ranked 17th. |
|
| Freshwater > Annual freshwater withdrawals > Domestic > % of total freshwater withdrawal |
22.83%
Ranked 45th. |
36.82%
Ranked 21st. 61% more than Norway |
|
| Water pollution > Wood industry > % of total BOD emissions |
3.13%
Ranked 24th. 4% more than Sweden |
3.02%
Ranked 27th. |
|
| Water pollution > Other industry > % of total BOD emissions |
7.51%
Ranked 20th. |
14.88%
Ranked 3rd. 98% more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net forest depletion > % of GNI |
0.0
Ranked 145th. |
0.0
Ranked 86th. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > % of total |
5.57%
Ranked 82nd. |
18.13%
Ranked 54th. 3 times more than Norway |
|
| Climate change > Other greenhouse gas emissions, HFC, PFC and SF6 > Thousand metric tons of CO2 equivalent |
1,823
Ranked 34th. |
2,198
Ranked 33th. 21% more than Norway |
|
| Freshwater > Annual freshwater withdrawals > Total > % of internal resources |
0.57%
Ranked 133th. |
1.73%
Ranked 106th. 3 times more than Norway |
|
| Emissions > Industrial methane emissions > % of total |
61.75%
Ranked 17th. 10 times more than Sweden |
6.5%
Ranked 105th. |
|
| Organic water pollutant > BOD emissions > Kg per day per worker |
0.19 kg per day per worker
Ranked 24th. 36% more than Sweden |
0.14 kg per day per worker
Ranked 68th. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Kyoto Protocol sign date | 29 April 1998 | 29 April 1998 | |
| Water pollution > Clay and glass industry > % of total BOD emissions |
0.13%
Ranked 51st. 18% more than Sweden |
0.11%
Ranked 63th. |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted net savings > Excluding particulate emission damage > Current US$ |
$73.49 billion
Ranked 14th. |
$100.31 billion
Ranked 11th. 36% more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > % of GNI |
15.9%
Ranked 23th. |
0.0
Ranked 113th. |
|
| Water > Net freshwater supplied by water supply industry to households |
372 million cubic metres
Ranked 8th. |
478 million cubic metres
Ranked 13th. 28% more than Norway |
|
| Emissions > Agricultural methane emissions > % of total |
14.32%
Ranked 111th. |
41.49%
Ranked 66th. 3 times more than Norway |
|
| Waste water treatment expenditure, % of GDP |
5.47e-08%
Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Sweden |
2.57e-08%
Ranked 7th. |
|
| Climate change > GHG net emissions/removals by LUCF > Mt of CO2 equivalent per million |
-5.245
Ranked 37th. 17% more than Sweden |
-4.478
Ranked 35th. |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > % of GNI |
0.01%
Ranked 70th. |
0.43%
Ranked 42nd. 43 times more than Norway |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from other sectors, excluding residential buildings and commercial and public services > % of total fuel combustion |
5.56%
Ranked 27th. 4 times more than Sweden |
1.43%
Ranked 86th. |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Gross savings > % of GNI |
41.16%
Ranked 17th. 52% more than Sweden |
27.08%
Ranked 39th. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Perfluorcarbons (PFCs) > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) per million people |
41.95
Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Sweden |
16.87
Ranked 8th. |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted net savings > Including particulate emission damage > % of GNI |
16.22%
Ranked 26th. |
20.46%
Ranked 12th. 26% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Water pollution, wood industry > % of total BOD emissions |
5.95%
Ranked 14th. 7% more than Sweden |
5.57%
Ranked 15th. |
|
| Emissions > Agricultural nitrous oxide emissions > % of total |
52.99%
Ranked 113th. |
76.77%
Ranked 85th. 45% more than Norway |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt |
37,872.78
Ranked 42nd. |
38,210.14
Ranked 41st. 1% more than Norway |
|
| Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2005 PPP $ of GDP |
$0.19
Ranked 130th. 19% more than Sweden |
$0.16
Ranked 143th. |
|
| Water pollution > Food industry > % of total BOD emissions |
42.82%
Ranked 45th. 61% more than Sweden |
26.63%
Ranked 70th. |
|
| Emissions > CO2 intensity > Kg per kg of oil equivalent energy use |
1.59
Ranked 96th. 62% more than Sweden |
0.98
Ranked 110th. |
|
| PM10 > Country level > Micrograms per cubic meter |
11.54 mcg/m³
Ranked 174th. |
12.24 mcg/m³
Ranked 173th. 6% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Green space and parks dissatisfaction |
21.97
Ranked 55th. 38% more than Sweden |
15.97
Ranked 58th. |
|
| Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per PPP $ of GDP |
$0.17
Ranked 137th. 21% more than Sweden |
$0.14
Ranked 145th. |
|
| Kyoto Protocol signatories > Signed and ratified > % for ratification | 0.26 | 0.4 | |
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net national savings > % of GNI |
26.19%
Ranked 22nd. 80% more than Sweden |
14.57%
Ranked 45th. |
|
| Pollution > Nitrogen Oxides per capita |
51
Ranked 5th. 34% more than Sweden |
38
Ranked 11th. |
|
| Water pollution > Water pollution > Paper and pulp industry > % of total BOD emissions |
14.34%
Ranked 2nd. 17% more than Sweden |
12.21%
Ranked 7th. |
|
| Water > Phosphorus concentration |
0.01 mls/litre
Ranked 139th. |
0.28 mls/litre
Ranked 86th. 28 times more than Norway |
|
| Pollution perceptions > Green space and parks satisfaction |
78.03
Ranked 5th. |
84.03
Ranked 2nd. 8% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) |
746.66
Ranked 26th. |
849.43
Ranked 24th. 14% more than Norway |
|
| CO2 Emissions |
35,312.2
Ranked 59th. |
48,760.9
Ranked 50th. 38% more than Norway |
|
| Total natural resources rents > % of GDP |
13.55%
Ranked 40th. 11 times more than Sweden |
1.2%
Ranked 117th. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) per million people |
152.72
Ranked 16th. 69% more than Sweden |
90.58
Ranked 32nd. |
|
| Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural |
100
Ranked 29th. The same as Sweden |
100
Ranked 11th. |
|
| Adjusted savings > Particulate emission damage > % of GNI |
0.08% of GNI
Ranked 140th. 8 times more than Sweden |
0.01% of GNI
Ranked 163th. |
|
| Water pollution > Chemical industry > % of total BOD emissions |
4.66%
Ranked 58th. |
7.78%
Ranked 43th. 67% more than Norway |
|
| International agreements > Signed but not ratified | none of the selected agreements | none of the selected agreements |
|
| Pollution > Water pollution, clay and glass industry > % of total BOD emissions |
4.29%
Ranked 41st. 65% more than Sweden |
2.6%
Ranked 58th. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > % of total |
66.23%
Ranked 98th. |
72.76%
Ranked 89th. 10% more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI |
0.08%
Ranked 156th. The same as Sweden |
0.08%
Ranked 155th. |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > % of GNI |
14.97%
Ranked 6th. 20% more than Sweden |
12.5%
Ranked 48th. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Nitrous oxide (N2O) > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) |
3,068.27
Ranked 34th. |
7,052.14
Ranked 23th. 2 times more than Norway |
|
| Water pollution > Water pollution > Metal industry > % of total BOD emissions |
5.12%
Ranked 12th. |
5.4%
Ranked 12th. 5% more than Norway |
|
| Water pollution > Water pollution > Other industry > % of total BOD emissions |
40.53%
Ranked 22nd. |
54.37%
Ranked 4th. 34% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Water pollution, chemical industry > % of total BOD emissions |
7.51%
Ranked 51st. |
9.91%
Ranked 33th. 32% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) per thousand people |
11.02
Ranked 16th. 56% more than Sweden |
7.07
Ranked 32nd. |
|
| Pollution > Water pollution, textile industry > % of total BOD emissions |
1.99%
Ranked 60th. 62% more than Sweden |
1.23%
Ranked 62nd. |
|
| Water pollution > Paper and pulp industry > % of total BOD emissions |
31.3%
Ranked 6th. |
35.04%
Ranked 4th. 12% more than Norway |
|
| Water > Surface and Groundwater inflow per capita |
2,418.24 cubic metres
Ranked 8th. 80% more than Sweden |
1,344.52 cubic metres
Ranked 9th. |
|
| Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters |
1.3%
Ranked 108th. |
5.33%
Ranked 46th. 4 times more than Norway |
|
| Red Kite > Populations and trends > Year | 1980 | 2000s | |
| Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI |
0.1% of GNI
Ranked 158th. The same as Sweden |
0.1% of GNI
Ranked 157th. |
|
| Pollution > Water pollution, metal industry > % of total BOD emissions |
4.86%
Ranked 16th. |
5.31%
Ranked 15th. 9% more than Norway |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from electricity and heat production, total > % of total fuel combustion |
36.33%
Ranked 76th. 54% more than Sweden |
23.56%
Ranked 106th. |
|
| Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > % of total |
24.94%
Ranked 55th. 4 times more than Sweden |
6.35%
Ranked 95th. |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > Perfluorcarbons (PFCs) > Emissions (CO2 equivalent) |
205.12
Ranked 13th. 30% more than Sweden |
158.21
Ranked 14th. |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Particulate emission damage > Current US$ |
$53.59 million
Ranked 71st. |
0.0
Ranked 142nd. |
|
| Water > Net freshwater supplied by water supply industry |
808 million cubic metres
Ranked 19th. 10% more than Sweden |
737 million cubic metres
Ranked 20th. |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Particulate emission damage > % of GNI |
0.01%
Ranked 145th. |
0.0
Ranked 152nd. |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ |
$38.16 million
Ranked 64th. |
$2.13 billion
Ranked 14th. 56 times more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted net national income > Constant 2000 US$, % of GDP |
72.73%
Ranked 137th. |
88.1%
Ranked 34th. 21% more than Norway |
|
| Pollution > Greenhouse gas emissions > United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change sign date | June 4, 1992 | June 8, 1992 | |
| Adjusted net national income > Current US$, % of GDP |
76.18%
Ranked 117th. |
88.42%
Ranked 29th. 16% more than Norway |
|
| Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area |
0.46%
Ranked 91st. |
4.86%
Ranked 33th. 11 times more than Norway |
|
| Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area |
5.22%
Ranked 135th. |
10.45%
Ranked 94th. Twice as much as Norway |
|
| Water pollution > Textile industry > % of total BOD emissions |
1.43%
Ranked 67th. 12% more than Sweden |
1.28%
Ranked 74th. |
|
| Municipal waste treatment expenditure, % of GDP |
5.21e-09%
Ranked 5th. 54% more than Sweden |
3.39e-09%
Ranked 9th. |
|
| Forest area > % of land area |
30.85% of land area
Ranked 90th. |
67.09% of land area
Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Norway |
|
| Water pollution > Metal industry > % of total BOD emissions |
9.02%
Ranked 22nd. |
11.27%
Ranked 17th. 25% more than Norway |
|
| Known breeding bird species |
241
Ranked 46th. |
259
Ranked 33th. 7% more than Norway |
|
| Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Net national savings > Current US$ |
$118.60 billion
Ranked 10th. 66% more than Sweden |
$71.45 billion
Ranked 16th. |
|
| Water > Suspended solids |
3.02 mls/litre
Ranked 128th. 22% more than Sweden |
2.47 mls/litre
Ranked 134th. |
We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.
We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!
We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.
Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.