Environment > Endangered species protection: Countries Compared
- Home
- Country Info
- Stats
- Environment
- Endangered species protection
DEFINITION:
Percent of CITES reporting requirements met
Units: Percent of Requirements Met
Units: Countries that have not ratified the CITES convention are recorded as having zero percent of their requirements met.
Units: Percent of Requirements Met
Units: Countries that have not ratified the CITES convention are recorded as having zero percent of their requirements met.
CONTENTS
Loading...
| # | COUNTRY | AMOUNT | DATE | GRAPH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| =1 | Dominica | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Netherlands | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | South Korea | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | France | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Slovakia | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Australia | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Italy | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | United Kingdom | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Greece | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Spain | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | New Zealand | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | India | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Czech Republic | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Mongolia | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | China | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Sweden | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Mali | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Austria | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Latvia | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Belgium | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Switzerland | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Germany | 100% | 2000 | |
| =1 | Tunisia | 100% | 2000 | |
| Group of 7 countries (G7) average (profile) | 96.11% | 2000 | ||
| =24 | Canada | 95.8% | 2000 | |
| =24 | South Africa | 95.8% | 2000 | |
| 26 | Denmark | 95.5% | 2000 | |
| 27 | Indonesia | 95% | 2000 | |
| 28 | Nicaragua | 90.9% | 2000 | |
| 29 | Botswana | 90.5% | 2000 | |
| 30 | Ethiopia | 90% | 2000 | |
| =31 | Guatemala | 89.5% | 2000 | |
| =31 | Japan | 89.5% | 2000 | |
| =33 | Zimbabwe | 88.9% | 2000 | |
| =33 | Argentina | 88.9% | 2000 | |
| =33 | Cuba | 88.9% | 2000 | |
| =33 | Poland | 88.9% | 2000 | |
| =37 | Madagascar | 87.5% | 2000 | |
| =37 | Mexico | 87.5% | 2000 | |
| =37 | United States | 87.5% | 2000 | |
| =37 | Democratic Republic of the Congo | 87.5% | 2000 | |
| =37 | Namibia | 87.5% | 2000 | |
| =42 | Norway | 87% | 2000 | |
| =42 | Ghana | 87% | 2000 | |
| =44 | Malaysia | 85.7% | 2000 | |
| =44 | Estonia | 85.7% | 2000 | |
| =44 | Hungary | 85.7% | 2000 | |
| 47 | Tanzania | 84.2% | 2000 | |
| High income OECD countries average (profile) | 83.74% | 2000 | ||
| =48 | Costa Rica | 83.3% | 2000 | |
| =48 | Philippines | 83.3% | 2000 | |
| =48 | Colombia | 83.3% | 2000 | |
| Eurozone average (profile) | 82.7% | 2000 | ||
| Non-religious countries average (profile) | 82.67% | 2000 | ||
| 51 | Finland | 82.6% | 2000 | |
| 52 | Senegal | 81.8% | 2000 | |
| 53 | Panama | 81% | 2000 | |
| =54 | Pakistan | 78.3% | 2000 | |
| =54 | Russia | 78.3% | 2000 | |
| =56 | Malawi | 77.8% | 2000 | |
| =56 | Mozambique | 77.8% | 2000 | |
| European Union average (profile) | 76.52% | 2000 | ||
| 58 | Venezuela | 76.2% | 2000 | |
| =59 | Nepal | 75% | 2000 | |
| =59 | Peru | 75% | 2000 | |
| =59 | Togo | 75% | 2000 | |
| =59 | Chile | 75% | 2000 | |
| Emerging markets average (profile) | 74.19% | 2000 | ||
| 63 | Papua New Guinea | 73.9% | 2000 | |
| Former Spanish colonies average (profile) | 73.28% | 2000 | ||
| NATO countries average (profile) | 72.31% | 2000 | ||
| =64 | Cameroon | 72.2% | 2000 | |
| =64 | Portugal | 72.2% | 2000 | |
| =64 | Zambia | 72.2% | 2000 | |
| 67 | Ecuador | 70.8% | 2000 | |
| 68 | Bangladesh | 70.6% | 2000 | |
| =69 | Gabon | 70% | 2000 | |
| =69 | Sri Lanka | 70% | 2000 | |
| 71 | Iran | 69.6% | 2000 | |
| 72 | Thailand | 68.8% | 2000 | |
| 73 | Paraguay | 68.2% | 2000 | |
| =74 | Turkey | 66.7% | 2000 | |
| =74 | Trinidad and Tobago | 66.7% | 2000 | |
| =74 | United Arab Emirates | 66.7% | 2000 | |
| 77 | Kenya | 65% | 2000 | |
| =78 | Bulgaria | 62.5% | 2000 | |
| =78 | Uruguay | 62.5% | 2000 | |
| South Asia average (profile) | 62.23% | 2000 | ||
| 80 | Morocco | 60.9% | 2000 | |
| =81 | Bolivia | 60% | 2000 | |
| =81 | Algeria | 60% | 2000 | |
| Cold countries average (profile) | 57.49% | 2000 | ||
| 83 | Sudan | 56.3% | 2000 | |
| =84 | Burkina Faso | 55.6% | 2000 | |
| =84 | Guinea-Bissau | 55.6% | 2000 | |
| 86 | Brazil | 54.2% | 2000 | |
| 87 | Israel | 52.6% | 2000 | |
| =88 | Uzbekistan | 50% | 2000 | |
| =88 | Jamaica | 50% | 2000 | |
| =88 | Chad | 50% | 2000 | |
| =88 | Uganda | 50% | 2000 | |
| =88 | Niger | 50% | 2000 | |
| =88 | Belarus | 50% | 2000 | |
| 94 | Central African Republic | 47.4% | 2000 | |
| 95 | Nigeria | 45.8% | 2000 | |
| 96 | Liberia | 44.4% | 2000 | |
| Former French colonies average (profile) | 43.95% | 2000 | ||
| 97 | The Gambia | 40.9% | 2000 | |
| South and Central Asia average (profile) | 40.35% | 2000 | ||
| =98 | Vietnam | 40% | 2000 | |
| =98 | Romania | 40% | 2000 | |
| failed states average (profile) | 39.81% | 2000 | ||
| Muslim countries average (profile) | 36.07% | 2000 | ||
| 100 | Jordan | 35% | 2000 | |
| 101 | El Salvador | 33.3% | 2000 | |
| OPEC countries average (profile) | 31.83% | 2000 | ||
| Middle Eastern and North Africa average (profile) | 30.92% | 2000 | ||
| 102 | Burundi | 27.3% | 2000 | |
| 103 | Benin | 26.7% | 2000 | |
| Former Soviet republics average (profile) | 26% | 2000 | ||
| 104 | Sierra Leone | 25% | 2000 | |
| 105 | Honduras | 21.4% | 2000 | |
| 106 | Egypt | 19% | 2000 | |
| 107 | Rwanda | 16.7% | 2000 | |
| 108 | Somalia | 7.7% | 2000 | |
| =109 | Turkmenistan | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Tajikistan | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Libya | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Guinea | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Ireland | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Moldova | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Lebanon | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Mauritania | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Syria | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Republic of Macedonia | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Lithuania | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Cambodia | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Saudi Arabia | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Slovenia | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Oman | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Albania | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Azerbaijan | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Laos | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Cote d'Ivoire | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Armenia | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Ukraine | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Angola | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Haiti | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Iraq | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Croatia | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Bhutan | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Kuwait | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Iceland | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Kazakhstan | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Kyrgyzstan | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | North Korea | 0.0 | 2000 | |
| =109 | Burma | 0.0 | 2000 |
Citation
Interesting observations about Environment > Endangered species protection
- India ranked first for endangered species protection amongst Hot countries in 2000.
- Italy ranked first for endangered species protection amongst European Union in 2000.
- Switzerland ranked first for endangered species protection amongst Christian countries in 2000.
- Mali ranked first for endangered species protection amongst Muslim countries in 2000.
- China ranked second for endangered species protection amongst Emerging markets in 2000.
- United States ranked last for endangered species protection amongst Group of 7 countries (G7) in 2000.
- Austria ranked second for endangered species protection amongst Cold countries in 2000.
- Nicaragua ranked first for endangered species protection amongst Former Spanish colonies in 2000.
- Israel ranked 4th last for endangered species protection amongst High income OECD countries in 2000.
- South Africa ranked second for endangered species protection amongst Sub-Saharan Africa in 2000.
