Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Norway

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Re-injected > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Re-injected per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Canada	Norway
Consumption	103.3 billion cu m Ranked 5th. 21 times more than Norway	4.81 billion cu m Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Per capita	2.78 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 98% more than Norway	1.4 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Consumption per capita	2,805.47 cu m Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Norway	956.77 cu m Ranked 24th.
Imports	31.31 billion cu m Ranked 18th.	0.0 Ranked 177th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	102,164 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 22 times more than Norway	4,668 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.16 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Norway	1.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	646,600 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 2694 times more than Norway	240 Terajoules Ranked 61st.
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	17.6 Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Norway	7.6 Ranked 7th.
Production > Billion cubic metres	182.8 Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Norway	78.5 Ranked 7th.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	6.79 Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Norway	2.92 Ranked 7th.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	5.71 Ranked 9th.	17.1 Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Canada
Proved reserves	1.93 trillion cu m Ranked 17th.	2.07 trillion cu m Ranked 16th. 7% more than Canada
Reserves	1.69 trillion cubic feet Ranked 13th.	1.72 trillion cubic feet Ranked 11th. 1% more than Canada
Reserves per capita	52,333.5 cubic feet Ranked 19th.	371,164.18 cubic feet Ranked 4th. 7 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	638,219 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Norway	194,351 Terajoules Ranked 10th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	2.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 146 times more than Norway	0.016 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	504,864 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 1020 times more than Norway	495 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	15.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 146 times more than Norway	0.107 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	6,192.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd. 60 times more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	200,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 421 times more than Norway	475 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	663,314 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 173 times more than Norway	3,826 Terajoules Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	162,015 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 7 times more than Norway	24,191 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Exports	4.07 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 23% more than Norway	3.31 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 2 times more than Norway	51.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	453,203 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 184 times more than Norway	2,463 Terajoules Ranked 90th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	14.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 26 times more than Norway	0.533 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 88th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	2.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th.	3.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 71% more than Canada
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	116.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 2 times more than Norway	51.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	7.17 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Norway	3.55 million Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	2.21 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 210 times more than Norway	10,514 Terajoules Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	68.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 30 times more than Norway	2.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Re-injected > Per capita	15.6 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 51 times more than Norway	0.303 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	7.15 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Norway	1.54 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 6th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	75,200 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 1016 times more than Norway	74 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	2.8 Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Norway	1 Ranked 27th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	8.6 Ranked 4th. 21 times more than Norway	0.4 Ranked 49th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	3.33 Ranked 4th. 20 times more than Norway	0.17 Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	14.03 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 26 times more than Norway	0.533 Terajoules Ranked 87th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	5.14 Ranked 9th.	15.37 Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	15.62 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 146 times more than Norway	0.107 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	6,189.65 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 60 times more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	612.28 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 4 times more than Norway	159.19 Terajoules Ranked 17th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	11.53 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 25 times more than Norway	0.463 Terajoules Ranked 84th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000	16.22 Terajoules Ranked 5th.	44.94 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	20.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 385 times more than Norway	0.052 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	2.28 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	3.9 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 71% more than Canada
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	164.5 Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Norway	70.6 Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	19.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th.	42.04 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 2 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	20.53 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 25 times more than Norway	0.828 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	125.83 Terajoules Ranked 7th.	715.62 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 2 times more than Norway	51.62 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	68.46 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 30 times more than Norway	2.27 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Re-injected per 1000	15.59 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 51 times more than Norway	0.303 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	51,396.94 cu m Ranked 25th.	473,078.5 cu m Ranked 6th. 9 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	1.97 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	19.9 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 10 times more than Canada
Imports per capita	491.89 cu m Ranked 24th.	0.0 Ranked 118th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	3.33 Ranked 4th. 20 times more than Norway	0.17 Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	20.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 25 times more than Norway	0.828 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	372,423 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 174 times more than Norway	2,142 Terajoules Ranked 88th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.16 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 3 times more than Norway	1.01 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	6,189.65 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 60 times more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	5.01 Terajoules Ranked 10th.	5.23 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 4% more than Canada
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	116.12 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 2 times more than Norway	51.62 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	255.96 Terajoules Ranked 9th.	771.44 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	221.87 Terajoules Ranked 10th.	767.24 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Canada
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	2.52 Ranked 5th. 3 times more than Norway	0.893 Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	36.25 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 114 times more than Norway	0.318 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	80.5 Ranked 4th. 20 times more than Norway	4.1 Ranked 49th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	6.79 Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Norway	2.92 Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	21.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th.	42.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 96% more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	694,103 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 4 times more than Norway	194,351 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	26.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 14 times more than Norway	1.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.17 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 796 times more than Norway	1,471 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	36.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 114 times more than Norway	0.318 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	840,678 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 98 times more than Norway	8,568 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	5.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th.	5.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 4% more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	6,192.14 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd. 60 times more than Norway	102.74 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	200,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 421 times more than Norway	475 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	612.53 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd. 4 times more than Norway	159.19 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 17th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	54,387 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 169 times more than Norway	321 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	19,784 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 27 times more than Norway	736 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 24 times more than Norway	0.069 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	11.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th. 25 times more than Norway	0.463 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 85th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented	73,696 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 4 times more than Norway	18,013 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 16 times more than Norway	238,652 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita	16.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th.	44.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 3 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	125.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th.	715.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 6 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage	524,000 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Norway	199,129 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.75 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 16 times more than Norway	238,652 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	8.27 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 2 times more than Norway	3.57 million Terajoules Ranked 7th.
Including LNG > Re-injected	503,705 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 360 times more than Norway	1,400 Terajoules Ranked 17th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	1,972.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.	19,901.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 6th. 10 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Total resources	63.72 million Terajoules Ranked 19th.	92.01 million Terajoules Ranked 15th. 44% more than Canada
Proved > Reserves	1.75 trillion cu m Ranked 21st.	2.31 trillion cu m Ranked 17th. 32% more than Canada
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	89.5 Ranked 4th. 19 times more than Norway	4.6 Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.68 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 24 times more than Norway	0.0694 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Proved reserves per capita	55,831.64 cu m Ranked 22nd.	438,308.5 cu m Ranked 6th. 8 times more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	20.01 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 385 times more than Norway	0.0519 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	21.48 Terajoules Ranked 9th.	42.04 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 96% more than Canada
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	26.02 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 14 times more than Norway	1.85 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	2.33 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 145 times more than Norway	0.016 Terajoules Ranked 47th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Canada and Norway in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Canada & Norway

Definitions

Citation

Compare Canada and Norway in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Canada and Norway in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation