Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Denmark & South Korea

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Denmark	South Korea
Consumption	4.18 billion cu m Ranked 39th.	45.9 billion cu m Ranked 13th. 11 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.2 Ranked 48th.	1.17 Ranked 21st. 6 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Per capita	833,010.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 39th. 17% more than South Korea	710,167.18 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 43th.
Consumption per capita	798.47 cu m Ranked 27th. 15% more than South Korea	693.14 cu m Ranked 33th.
Imports	254 million cu m Ranked 37th.	47.31 billion cu m Ranked 8th. 186 times more than Denmark
Imports per capita	0.0 Ranked 98th.	664.67 cu m Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	3,980 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	19,581 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 5 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by households	32,277 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	389,538 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 12 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 94% more than South Korea	2.72 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.27 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 93% more than South Korea	2.73 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 43% more than South Korea	26.46 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	14.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	15.45 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 7% more than Denmark
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	11,049.66 cu m Ranked 38th. 11 times more than South Korea	1,021.47 cu m Ranked 74th.
Proved reserves	42.98 billion cu m Ranked 63th. 8 times more than South Korea	5.27 billion cu m Ranked 90th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	93,184 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	509,700 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 5 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.734 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 81% more than South Korea	0.407 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 43% more than South Korea	26.46 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	82.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 193 times more than South Korea	0.426 Terajoules Ranked 75th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	80.55 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 189 times more than South Korea	0.426 Terajoules Ranked 75th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.907 Ranked 26th. 53% more than South Korea	0.591 Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.34 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	11.11 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 33% more than Denmark
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	4.9 Ranked 48th.	28.4 Ranked 21st. 6 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-1,226 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	-38,317 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 31 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	4,969 Terajoules Ranked 9th.	9,925 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. Twice as much as Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.735 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 81% more than South Korea	0.405 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 3 times more than South Korea	11,376 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.143 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	0.885 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 6 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	10,446 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	144,033 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 14 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.	2.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 55% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	28,556 Terajoules Ranked 50th.	131,569 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 5 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	461.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th. 19 times more than South Korea	23.67 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 43% more than South Korea	26.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	98,659 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	515,241 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 5 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 71% more than South Korea	10.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 43% more than South Korea	26.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	1.27 million Terajoules Ranked 20th. 6 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Gross > Production	444,626 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 22 times more than South Korea	20,495 Terajoules Ranked 66th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	436,520 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 21 times more than South Korea	20,495 Terajoules Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	78,530 Terajoules Ranked 49th.	743,674 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 9 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	15.4 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th. 6% more than Denmark
Proved > Reserves	61.3 billion cu m Ranked 60th. 23% more than South Korea	50 billion cu m Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	773 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	42,744 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 55 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.896 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 8 times more than South Korea	0.115 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	957.67 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 4 times more than South Korea	223.27 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Proved reserves per capita	7,735.15 cu m Ranked 41st. 72 times more than South Korea	107.59 cu m Ranked 94th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-226.223 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	-795.982 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 4 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	8.09 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 36% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 24 times more than South Korea	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	6.15 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 53% more than South Korea	4.03 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.143 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	0.888 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 6 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 24 times more than South Korea	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	957.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 4 times more than South Korea	223.27 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	5.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 24 times more than South Korea	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 3 times more than South Korea	11,376 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 53% more than South Korea	4.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	45,221 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	534,714 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 12 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.	11.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 33% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	33,309 Terajoules Ranked 54th.	193,894 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 6 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	4,855 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	5,541 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 14% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	2,498 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 2 times more than South Korea	1,143 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.896 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 8 times more than South Korea	0.115 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	17.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 63% more than South Korea	10.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	1.27 million Terajoules Ranked 20th. 6 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-654,175,478,556.227 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 43th.	66.82 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 20th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.999 Ranked 28th. 52% more than South Korea	0.658 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	5.4 Ranked 48th.	31.6 Ranked 21st. 6 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	0.5 Ranked 48th.	3 Ranked 21st. 6 times more than Denmark
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.2 Ranked 48th.	1.17 Ranked 21st. 6 times more than Denmark
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 70% more than South Korea	10.7 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	1.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	2.99 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 55% more than Denmark
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	460.93 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 19 times more than South Korea	23.74 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.19 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 62% more than South Korea	10.59 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.	8.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 35% more than Denmark

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Denmark and South Korea in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Denmark & South Korea

Definitions

Citation

Compare Denmark and South Korea in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Denmark and South Korea in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation