Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Germany & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Germany	Latvia	HISTORY
Changes in stocks	-26,000 ton Ranked 56th. 3 times more than Latvia	-10,000 ton Ranked 48th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-0.315 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 43th.	-4.347 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 65th. 14 times more than Germany
Consumption by chemical industry	95,000 ton Ranked 21st. 32 times more than Latvia	3,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.15 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.	1.29 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th. 12% more than Germany
Consumption by households and other consumers	8,000 ton Ranked 70th.	13,000 ton Ranked 64th. 63% more than Germany
Consumption by industry and construction	925,000 ton Ranked 27th. 77 times more than Latvia	12,000 ton Ranked 109th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	11.22 ton Ranked 74th. 2 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton Ranked 86th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	944,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 25 times more than Latvia	38,000 ton Ranked 15th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	11.45 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th.	16.52 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 6th. 44% more than Germany
Conversion in thermal power plants	2.37 million ton Ranked 19th. 169 times more than Latvia	14,000 ton Ranked 112th.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	28.68 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 73th. 5 times more than Latvia	6.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 99th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	4.05 million ton Ranked 14th. 78 times more than Latvia	52,000 ton Ranked 98th.
Imports	3.06 million ton Ranked 10th. 13 times more than Latvia	244,000 ton Ranked 61st.
Imports > Per capita	37.1 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 55th.	106.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 3 times more than Germany
Net transfers	472,000 ton Ranked 5th.	-291,000 ton Ranked 20th.
Net transfers > Per capita	5.72 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th.	-126.494 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	11.31 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 92nd. 4% more than Latvia	10.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 95th.
Transfers in per million	-8,693.693 ton Ranked 5th.	-126,493.581 ton Ranked 12th. 15 times more than Germany
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.097 ton Ranked 86th.	5.65 ton Ranked 30th. 58 times more than Germany
Bunkers	2.11 million ton Ranked 15th. 12 times more than Latvia	174,000 ton Ranked 43th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	9,000 ton Ranked 28th. 13% more than Latvia	8,000 ton Ranked 33th.
Consumption by energy sector	822,000 ton Ranked 16th. 822 times more than Latvia	1,000 ton Ranked 70th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	9.97 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th. 23 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 66th.
Consumption by other consumers	8,000 ton Ranked 52nd.	9,000 ton Ranked 50th. 13% more than Germany
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.097 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 77th.	3.91 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 31st. 40 times more than Germany
Bunkers per 1000	25.59 ton Ranked 37th.	75.64 ton Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Germany
Changes in stocks per million	-315.268 ton Ranked 43th.	-4,346.858 ton Ranked 65th. 14 times more than Germany
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.109 ton Ranked 31st.	3.29 ton Ranked 20th. 30 times more than Germany
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	9.96 ton Ranked 72nd. 91% more than Latvia	5.22 ton Ranked 82nd.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	11.45 ton Ranked 9th.	16.52 ton Ranked 6th. 44% more than Germany
Imports per 1000	37.1 ton Ranked 49th.	106.06 ton Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Germany
Net transfers per 1000	5.72 ton Ranked 7th.	-126.494 ton Ranked 21st.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.15 ton Ranked 34th.	1.29 ton Ranked 34th. 12% more than Germany
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	9.97 ton Ranked 31st. 23 times more than Latvia	0.435 ton Ranked 64th.
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	28.68 ton Ranked 67th. 5 times more than Latvia	6.09 ton Ranked 92nd.
Net inland availability per 1000	11.31 ton Ranked 85th. 4% more than Latvia	10.87 ton Ranked 88th.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	49.06 ton Ranked 53th. 2 times more than Latvia	22.6 ton Ranked 72nd.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.097 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 91st.	5.65 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th. 58 times more than Germany
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	11.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 78th. 2 times more than Latvia	5.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 90th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	821,000 ton Ranked 24th. 68 times more than Latvia	12,000 ton Ranked 109th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.109 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 32nd.	3.27 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 20th. 30 times more than Germany
Transfers in	-708,000 ton Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Latvia	-291,000 ton Ranked 10th.
Bunkers > Per capita	25.59 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd.	75.64 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Germany
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	9.96 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 76th. 91% more than Latvia	5.22 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 86th.
Net inland availability	933,000 ton Ranked 35th. 37 times more than Latvia	25,000 ton Ranked 121st.
Transfers in > Per capita	-8.685 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.	-126.494 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 12th. 15 times more than Germany
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.097 ton Ranked 72nd.	3.91 ton Ranked 26th. 40 times more than Germany
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	49.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 58th. 2 times more than Latvia	22.6 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation