Energy > Residual fuel oil Stats: compare key data on Japan & Poland

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Japan	Poland	HISTORY
Consumption by households and other consumers	408,000 ton Ranked 12th. 2 times more than Poland	183,000 ton Ranked 24th.
Consumption by industry and construction	6.24 million ton Ranked 6th. 16 times more than Poland	402,000 ton Ranked 43th.
Consumption for non-energy uses	484,000 ton Ranked 3rd. 23 times more than Poland	21,000 ton Ranked 5th.
Consumption in agriculture	408,000 ton Ranked 2nd. 2 times more than Poland	183,000 ton Ranked 6th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	3.19 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 11th.	4.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 8th. 50% more than Japan
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways	2.69 million ton Ranked 2nd. 2692 times more than Poland	1,000 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways > Per capita	21.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th. 810 times more than Poland	0.026 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 35th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	23,000 ton Ranked 20th.	27,000 ton Ranked 19th. 17% more than Japan
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.18 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.	0.707 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 23th. 4 times more than Japan
Conversion in thermal power plants	14.55 million ton Ranked 3rd. 27 times more than Poland	534,000 ton Ranked 51st.
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	113.86 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 36th. 8 times more than Poland	13.99 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 83th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	14.57 million ton Ranked 3rd. 26 times more than Poland	561,000 ton Ranked 51st.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	114.05 ton Ranked 32nd. 8 times more than Poland	14.7 ton Ranked 78th.
Imports	3.75 million ton Ranked 9th. 289 times more than Poland	13,000 ton Ranked 123th.
Imports > Per capita	29.39 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 61st. 86 times more than Poland	0.341 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 136th.
Net transfers	-127,000 ton Ranked 17th.	188,000 ton Ranked 9th.
Net transfers > Per capita	-0.994 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.	4.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th.
Net inland availability > Per capita	73.1 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 34th. 5 times more than Poland	15.33 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th.
Transfers out	18,000 ton Ranked 10th.	188,000 ton Ranked 9th. 10 times more than Japan
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	21.07 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th. 51 times more than Poland	0.414 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	3.19 ton Ranked 45th.	4.79 ton Ranked 33th. 50% more than Japan
Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	12.44 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 24th.	18.47 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 22nd. 49% more than Japan
Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	3.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 4th. 7 times more than Poland	0.544 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 5th.
Bunkers	5.89 million ton Ranked 8th. 28 times more than Poland	212,000 ton Ranked 41st.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	629,000 ton Ranked 4th. 39 times more than Poland	16,000 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by energy sector	1.76 million ton Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Poland	712,000 ton Ranked 18th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	13.76 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 27th.	18.66 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 25th. 36% more than Japan
Bunkers per 1000	46.09 ton Ranked 29th. 8 times more than Poland	5.55 ton Ranked 54th.
Changes in stocks at producers per 1000	-1.609 ton Ranked 7th.	0.104 ton Ranked 29th.
Changes in stocks per million	-563.499 ton Ranked 46th.	130.95 ton Ranked 39th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	4.92 ton Ranked 9th. 12 times more than Poland	0.418 ton Ranked 28th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	12.44 ton Ranked 23th.	18.47 ton Ranked 19th. 49% more than Japan
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	30.85 ton Ranked 39th. 4 times more than Poland	7.97 ton Ranked 74th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries per 1000	1.32 ton Ranked 1st. 7 times more than Poland	0.183 ton Ranked 7th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.18 ton Ranked 26th.	0.707 ton Ranked 23th. 4 times more than Japan
Imports per 1000	29.39 ton Ranked 54th. 86 times more than Poland	0.341 ton Ranked 126th.
Net transfers per 1000	-0.994 ton Ranked 12th.	4.87 ton Ranked 10th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	13.06 ton Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Poland	2.57 ton Ranked 25th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	13.76 ton Ranked 25th.	18.66 ton Ranked 22nd. 36% more than Japan
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	113.87 ton Ranked 30th. 8 times more than Poland	13.99 ton Ranked 76th.
Transfers out per 1000	0.142 ton Ranked 9th.	4.87 ton Ranked 10th. 34 times more than Japan
Net inland availability per 1000	73.1 ton Ranked 27th. 5 times more than Poland	15.33 ton Ranked 78th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	48.84 ton Ranked 26th. 5 times more than Poland	10.53 ton Ranked 75th.
Consumption in agriculture per 1000	3.19 ton Ranked 11th.	4.79 ton Ranked 8th. 50% more than Japan
Changes in stocks at producers	-201,000 ton Ranked 9th.	4,000 ton Ranked 29th.
Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	-1.609 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.	0.104 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 30th.
Consumption by chemical industry	1.67 million ton Ranked 4th. 17 times more than Poland	98,000 ton Ranked 20th.
Changes in stocks	-72,000 ton Ranked 63th.	5,000 ton Ranked 37th.
Changes in stocks > Per capita	-0.563 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 46th.	0.131 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 40th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	13.06 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th. 5 times more than Poland	2.57 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 26th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	3.19 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 50th.	4.79 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 50% more than Japan
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	48.84 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 29th. 5 times more than Poland	10.53 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 79th.
Consumption by petroleum refineries	1.59 million ton Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Poland	705,000 ton Ranked 15th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	3.94 million ton Ranked 6th. 13 times more than Poland	304,000 ton Ranked 48th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	4.92 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 12 times more than Poland	0.418 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 28th.
Bunkers > Per capita	46.09 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 33th. 8 times more than Poland	5.55 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 59th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	30.85 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 42nd. 4 times more than Poland	7.96 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 78th.
Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	3.79 ton Ranked 4th. 7 times more than Poland	0.544 ton Ranked 5th.
Consumption in inland and coastal waterways per 1000	21.07 ton Ranked 5th. 814 times more than Poland	0.0259 ton Ranked 35th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries > Per capita	1.32 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 7 times more than Poland	0.183 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 7th.
Consumption by thermal power plants and auxiliaries	169,000 ton Ranked 1st. 24 times more than Poland	7,000 ton Ranked 5th.
Net inland availability	9.34 million ton Ranked 4th. 16 times more than Poland	585,000 ton Ranked 40th.
Transfers out > Per capita	0.142 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 9th.	4.87 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 34 times more than Japan
Consumption by transportation industry	2.69 million ton Ranked 2nd. 168 times more than Poland	16,000 ton Ranked 32nd.
Consumption by transportation industry per 1000	21.07 ton Ranked 7th. 51 times more than Poland	0.414 ton Ranked 39th.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	114.05 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 38th. 8 times more than Poland	14.7 ton per 1,000 people Ranked 85th.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation