×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Latvia & United Kingdom

Definitions

STAT Latvia United Kingdom HISTORY
Consumption 1.52 billion cu m
Ranked 63th.
82.21 billion cu m
Ranked 7th. 54 times more than Latvia

Consumption > Per capita 902,730.76 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 35th.
1.5 million cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 17th. 66% more than Latvia

Consumption per capita 677.21 cu m
Ranked 35th.
1,414.8 cu m
Ranked 12th. 2 times more than Latvia

Imports 1.58 billion cu m
Ranked 50th.
49.1 billion cu m
Ranked 6th. 31 times more than Latvia

Imports per capita 773.01 cu m
Ranked 14th. 16% more than United Kingdom
664.28 cu m
Ranked 20th.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry 485 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
149,119 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 307 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by households 4,659 Terajoules
Ranked 49th.
1.37 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 295 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000 1.99 Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 4 times more than United Kingdom
0.503 Terajoules
Ranked 27th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 37th.
5.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 24th. 57% more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 3.76 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.
5.91 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 57% more than Latvia

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 25,156 Terajoules
Ranked 74th.
1.2 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 48 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 27.46 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
65.58 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 10.27 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
38.09 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Latvia

Production None None
Proved reserves 0.0
Ranked 127th.
246 billion cu m
Ranked 41st.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 0.211 Terajoules
Ranked 47th.
2.48 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 12 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million 80.85 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd.
584.15 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 7 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 27.46 Terajoules
Ranked 46th.
65.58 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 4.28 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
29.2 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 7 times more than Latvia

Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 33th.
22.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th. 11 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Imports per 1000 29 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
10.36 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 47th.
2.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 15th. 12 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 1.99 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 11th. 4 times more than United Kingdom
0.503 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 4,360 Terajoules
Ranked 48th.
376,027 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 86 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 25th.
6.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 8,646 Terajoules
Ranked 69th.
356,062 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 41 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants 13,230 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.
74,600 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 6 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture 820 Terajoules
Ranked 27th.
7,924 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 10 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita 5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 5th. 5 times more than United Kingdom
1.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 22nd.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 41st.
19.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 82% more than Latvia

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.
65.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 38,386 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.
1.28 million Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 33 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 29th.
21.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 27% more than Latvia

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 46th.
65.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 63,169 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.
3.95 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 63 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Imports > Per capita 29 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 17th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
10.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 35th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability 23,628 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.
2.29 million Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 97 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 40th.
38.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th. 4 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry 4,583 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.
30,276 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 7 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 1.9 Terajoules
Ranked 24th.
6.24 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million 356.44 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
131.57 Terajoules
Ranked 20th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 10.93 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
19.96 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 82% more than Latvia

Proved reserves per capita 0.0
Ranked 127th.
3,880.4 cu m
Ranked 57th.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million 1,539.22 Terajoules
Ranked 4th.
-78.971 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 2.03 Terajoules
Ranked 33th.
22.83 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 11 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 0.421 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
5.09 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 12 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 5.96 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.
8.89 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 49% more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 9,839 Terajoules
Ranked 54th.
1.76 million Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 179 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th.
29.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th. 7 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 13,714 Terajoules
Ranked 71st.
535,457 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 39 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita 356.44 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 8th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
131.57 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 20th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 63,169 Terajoules
Ranked 76th.
3.95 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 63 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Imports 66,710 Terajoules
Ranked 40th.
624,135 Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 9 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses 186 Terajoules
Ranked 37th.
35,180 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 189 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita 214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 14th. 5 times more than United Kingdom
40.31 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 22nd.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 16.69 Terajoules
Ranked 29th.
21.19 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 27% more than Latvia

Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000 5.75 Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 5 times more than United Kingdom
1.24 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks 3,541 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.
-4,756 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 51st.
5.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 12 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 969 Terajoules
Ranked 64th.
306,298 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 316 times more than Latvia

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 35th.
8.89 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 26th. 49% more than Latvia

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×