DEFINITION
This entry is the total oil consumed in barrels per day (bbl/day). The discrepancy between the amount of oil produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes, refinery gains, and other complicating factors.
DEFINITION: This entry is the total oil consumed in barrels per day (bbl/day). The discrepancy between the amount of oil produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes, refinery gains, and other complicating factors.
Stalin's Lost Oil represents 2.5 months of global consumption--hardly earth-shattering.
Oleg 30th June 2010
БУДУЩЕЕ ЦИВИЛИЗАЦИИ
http://futureofcivilization.blogspot.com/
ВОЙНА ЗА НЕФТЬ
http://futureofcivilization.blogspot.com/2010/06/blog-post.html
nic sword 26th June 2010
What a bunch of loser and lemmings on this site! No wonder the world is screwed up. People like these!
sawyer 21st June 2010
Barrels or gallons? I've seen an upper estimate of 100k barrels, which would be 4.2 million gallons.
David In WA 20th June 2010
BP estimates show 2.5 million barrels a day now (6-20-2010) with max-worst case scenario at 4.3 million barrels a day.
Which is BAD, but not 8000 barrels a second.
Consider that the US currently consumes 19.498 million barrels a day (according to the US Energy Information Adminstation as of 6-2009)
That means we consume the amount spilled every day in approx. 6 hours.
If our fascination with oil was reduced, we wouldn't even consider drilling, drilling, drilling.
Dool 20th June 2010
For Concerned in WI and South Dakota: You are both morons. Even the highest estimates for the Gulf Flow top out at 60K bbl per day (that's 0.7 per sec, not 8000). Even if it was 8000, you are missing a few zeros in your calculation. Worse, the well only holds 50M bbl. That's about two days supply for the U.S.
Concerned for USA schooling 20th June 2010
If the well is leaking 8000 barrels / second then that is only 8 times the whole global daily usage from the table above.
The reality is the US is so oil dependent that at the current estimate of the leak at between 35,000-50,000 bbl/day the leaking accounts for at maximum 0.25% of US daily oil consumption. It is so to speak a drop in the ocean and such disasters are inevitable given the USA's insatiable demand and love of oil for the vast, vast majority of it's history.
Please note that the oil flowing from this damaged well is NOT 8000 barrels every second. It may be as high as 60000 barrels a DAY, which is less than ONE barrel every second.
There is no single oil well in the world that flows 8000 barrels every second - it is a physical impossibility. Which you should have realized if you have any knowledge at all of oil.
Concerned in South Dakota,US 20th June 2010
Thank you "Concerned in WI, USA". That's exactly what I was thinking. This one oil well, leaking 8000 barrels per second in the gulf, could be producing a significant portion (1/30th) of the United States' total oil consumption. With that kind of production from one well in the Gulf (there are thousands), the US should be independent of foriegn oil.
concerned in WI, US 11th June 2010
The world knows that BP off shore well that is spilling 8000 barrels of oil per second into the gulf of Mexico. If you do the math the United States would only have to have 30 wells of this type to be self sufficient. Now they say the spill might be twice as much as reported earlier. The oil companies have created a monopoly that the citizens of this world are paying. The US has more than 30 wells in this country and should be self sufficient. Where are all the politicians that say Drill, Drill, and Drill our way to independence from foreign oil? We already produce enough to be self sufficient. If more drilling is needed then these companies need to have safety measures in place and be willing to pay for their errors.
Leia Anderson 9th June 2010
My friend told me about this. This website was so informative. It helped me with my studies. I using this site again.
Aaron 4th May 2010
Old Axe - Good luck on that whole perpetual motion thing. I'm sure all the rejects that wasted time on that before you just weren't thinking along the same lines as you.
sabrina 12th April 2010
WHO IS 2nd???
OldAxe 12th April 2010
Edgar Cayce (The sleeping prophet)foresaw a machine that produced more power than it used. How would the world markets react to unlimited free power?
Ziggy 26th March 2010
Its replaced by air and other things, and does not shrink the size of the earth. Look op the law of conservation of matter if you want proof. The oil has to go somewhere, and eventually ends up back in this earth. Just think of how much trash and waste we put on the earth. The amount of oil we take out is peanuts compared to this.
Lutombi 18th March 2010
I can see that we seem to be worried over availability of oil and carbon emission only. What about the diminishing earth size? I am neither a Mathematician nor a Scientist but let me ask this: If a earth has a diameter of 13,000kms and we are pumping out 62.1 million barrels or 9.9 Billion litres per day(3.6 Trillion litres per year) What impact is this volume of oil drained from earth having on earth? Tsunamis? Earthquakes, Losing land to the rising sea level? I bet oil profits is also delaying the "full implementation of the electric & hydrogen car". Could Avarice be the main problem? When earth is gone what are we going to do with the profits?
Lutombi 18th March 2010
I can see that we seem to be worried over long term availability of oil and carbon emission only. What about the diminishing earth size? I am neither a Mathematician nor a Scientist but let me ask this: If a earth has a diameter of about 13,000kms and we are pumping out 62.1 million barrels or 9.9 Billion litres per day(3.6 Trillion litres per year) of oil, What impact is this volume of oil drained from earth having on earth? Tsunamis? Earthquakes? Losing land to the rising sea level? I bet oil profits is also delaying the "full implementation of the electric & hydrogen car". Could Avarice be the main problem? When earth is gone what are we going to do with the profits?
Milly 15th March 2010
I use lots of oil, in my porno's
please check them out
www.meltedchocolate.com
Dex 5th March 2010
Bring on hell and the carbon footprit i say! To hell with bloody heaven! Bring on the devin himself....SATAN!
Leah Harred 25th February 2010
I can't believe the US uses so much oil. It is also the number 1 energy consumer in the world.
Steve 25th February 2010
Global oil production peaked in the first quarter of 2008. It also happens to be the date for Peak Oil. World output is running flat out, and wildly changing prices only change consumpiton to meet supply. Normally, price changes, change supply to meet the demand. The U.S.A reached Peak Oil in 1970. Production is now half of the 1970 rates despite lots of residual oil, better technology to find oil, and better technology to extract it. U.S. oil production has now fallen back to the 1947 levels. Global output will be half of todays output in 40 years, with twice the population to share it.
Steve 30th January 2010
Why did you calculate 2430AD ? The world consumes ca. 85m/day x 365 days = 31 bn / year. As the whole world has only proven reserves of ca. 1,300 bn / 31 bn consumption = 42 years from now i.e in 2051 we have no oil left !!! Most likely even earlier, as consumption should grow further with the growth of the developing countries (China, etc). On the other hand, gas will last much longer and I am sure humanity will find/create alternative energies.
Kirt 27th January 2010
Continuing at this rate of oil consumption, the world wont run out of oil until 2430AD. Keep it up, World. Keep it up
Barney 27th January 2010
I have just discovered this site and so far so good. But with all due respect, I was disappointed to see that a bible basher has been allowed to infiltrate the the site. I appreciate that not all comments are going to be relevant to the site, but bible comments take the cake. thanks for your site :-)
Elune 6th January 2010
I must say, great statistics about oil consumption.
Custom website design
Elune 6th January 2010
I must say, great statistics!
Custom web design
EMILY26 5th January 2010
Your superb knowledge referring to this topic comes side by side with the thesis titles. Thus, you should work for thesis writing service .
None of your business 4th January 2010
Okay, why is everyone talking about Jesus on an oil info site?! whoever peter neufeld is, he needs to get a life and stop preaching to random people. Jesus has nothing to do with oil and no one needs to listen to neufeld about "how to pray".
Kristin19 18th December 2009
Lots of paper writing services do the custom written essays close to this post. Thus, it is a very good opportunity to buy custom essay papers and term papers about this good post.
Tyler Say-Rathbone 7th December 2009
Why is there not a number two in the chart
Angela 30th November 2009
Jesus is definitely coming back. But I agree with you in that we should be concerned about our world and try other ways of energy consumption than burning fossil fuel.
JC NOT Jesus Christ 21st November 2009
Jesus Christ isn't coming back and awaiting his return versus advocating the strict reduction of oil consumption around the world is a foolish notion.
CHESNEY WRIGHT IN THE HOUSE 16th October 2009
THANKYOU VERY MUCH FOR THIS HELPFUL SITE
Jake H 1st October 2009
The #2 rank is the European Union. It is located on the bottom of the chart because the EU is representing numerous countries, obivously
Jason 30th September 2009
I don't see a #2 ranked when I view the page. U.S. is first, then list skips to China #3...
Peter+Neufeld 6th September 2009
Jesus Christ is coming back very soon. There will be no shortages in Heaven. Only joy and Peace which we all long for.
Hell will be very hot. In hell there will be a lot of carbon. Lots of "carbon footprints", pain and horrible suffering. Turn to Jesus today before it is forever too late. Jesus loves you. God loves you. God GAVE His only begotten Son Jesus Christ to die for you. Jesus shed His blood to wash away your sins and make you white as snow.
Pray like this: Dear Jesus, I repent of my sins and I ask you to wash away my sins with your shed blood. I accept you Jesus as my ONLY Saviour. Jesus, please forgive me of all my wicked sins. Thank you Jesus for saving me from hellfire right now. Amen
Peter+Neufeld 5th September 2009
Jesus Christ is coming back very soon. There will be no shortages in Heaven. Only joy and Peace which we all long for.
Hell will be very hot. In hell there will be a lot of carbon. Lots of "carbon footprints", pain and horrible suffering. Turn to Jesus today before it is forever too late. Jesus loves you. God loves you. God GAVE His only begotten Son Jesus Christ to die for you. Jesus shed His blood to wash away your sins and make you white as snow.
Pray like this: Dear Jesus, I repent of my sins and I ask you to wash away my sins with your shed blood. I accept you Jesus as my ONLY Saviour. Jesus, please forgive me of all my wicked sins. Thank you Jesus for saving me from hellfire right now. Amen
Peter Neufeld 5th September 2009
Jesus Christ is coming back very soon. There will be no shortages in Heaven. Only joy and Peace which we all long for.
Hell will be very hot. In hell there will be a lot of carbon. Lots of "carbon footprints", pain and horrible suffering. Turn to Jesus today before it is forever too late. Jesus loves you. God loves you. God GAVE His only begotten Son Jesus Christ to die for you. Jesus shed His blood to wash away your sins and make you white as snow.
Pray like this:
Dear Jesus, I repent of my sins and I ask you to wash away my sins with your shed blood. I accept you Jesus as my ONLY Saviour. Jesus, please forgive me of all my wicked sins. Thank you Jesus for saving me from hellfire right now. Amen
H 25th June 2009
What products are made of oil ?
Buttsford (OC, Califorina) 5th March 2009
your site is good i like it it help me in my homework and haha go USA!!! woo top doggie
david Percival (Kenya, Nairobi) 21st February 2009
The world recession has provided a once off opportunity. The current price of oil is aound 40$ a barrel. The sure way to reduce the use of fuels is to raise the price by putting a world tax on it to double the price. The revenue generated by the producing countries could then be applied to installing renewable alternatives. This would give a long lasting income to the countries who produce this oil, as they all realie that their income from this once off hit is going to run out with the oil. So we give them a future revenue stream from selling energy coming out of their investments in other countries where this tax is used to generate alernatives. If the current price was again increase today to 80$ a barrel, it would again reduce demand, potentially increasing the span of time till the oil runs out.
How on earth can we get everyone to see that this is a viable course, as I don't know how, but see it as a future possibility. dp
ray (California, USA) 24th October 2007
This chart only shows oil usage, not total energy use, and isn't adjusted for energy efficiency. If you look at how much contribution to GDP energy makes on a per BTU basis, the US looks considerably different.
Daniel Harwick 20th December 2005
There are no nations with names starting with T through Z on this list, yet the rankings are based on only the nations which appear. That's why the US isn't shown. Pardon my frankness, but this has to be the worst statistical coding I've ever seen.
21st August 2005
Why is US consumption left out?
Edria Murray Staff Editor 28th May 2005
The purpose of the Kyoto Protocol is to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases regardless of how these emissions are produced. Countries which intend to maintain or increase their current level of emissions of these gases are able to engage in emissions trading with countries whose emission levels are lower that their quota (such as Australia and Iceland.)
The protocol only sets firm limits on developed or "Annex 1" countries. All developing countries are exempt from the requirements until they gain Annex 1 status. China, for example, which is currently exempted from the requirements of the protocol, is expected to become an Annex I country within the next decade. At that time the exemption will be lifted.
The reasons that no limits are placed on developing nations are:
Pollution is strongly linked to industrial growth and restricting pollution may restrict economic growth in these countries.
To prevent developing nations from selling emissions credits to industrialised nations to permit those nations to over-pollute.
These countries receive money and technologies from some developed countries.
The exemption of developing nations from the requirements of the protocol is controversial and is the main reason that the United States has not ratified the Kyoto Protocol.
Edria Murray Staff Editor 18th April 2005
In response to Ridiculous;
In 2004 South Korea consumed around 2.14 million barrels a day. This amounts to a per capita use of 44.3 barrels per 1000 people per day, a comparable usage rate to Australia.
Between 1980 and 2000, oil consumption in South Korea increased fourfold. South Korea has ratified the Kyoto Protocol to reduce emissions caused by the burning of fossil fuels, although it has not undertaken to meet specific targets.
South Korea was not included in the list above as this information has only recently become available to the source.
Ian Graham Staff Editor 30th March 2005
According to Al Jazeera, an International Energy Agency (IEA) report suggests that governments should cut back fuel consumption by encouraging car-pooling, cutting or eliminating bus and subway fares, and enforcing speed restrictions and compulsory driving bans.
The driving bans suggested include requiring everyone not to drive one day out of every 10, or limiting vehicles with odd- or even-numbered license plates to driving on odd- or even-numbered days.
The IEA study admits that enforcing such bans would require the hiring of additional police or traffic officers. They estimate that one additional officer would be required for every 100,000 employed people.
An emergency treaty of the IEA – the Agreement on an International Energy Program – would require member countries to reduce oil consumption by seven to 10 percent if activated. The world’s five biggest economies – United States, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom and France – are all members of the IEA.
Suchita Vemuri Staff Editor 24th March 2005
Hi Michael, you're right. The EIA has estimated that demand for oil in the United States would reach 28.3 million barrels per day in 2025, with transportation demand projected to grow to 41.2 quadrillion Btu in 2025. It has projected that energy use for transportation in China would be 14.0 quadrillion Btu in 2025.
Edria Murray Staff editor 18th March 2005
In response to Ferngariby:
Emissions from the burning of fossil fuels contribute to acid rain, global warming and poor air quality. In turn, these are responsible for environmental damage and human health problems including aggravation of asthma, emphysema, bronchitis and existing heart disease and reducing the immune system response to inhaled micro organisms.
As a result of these concerns in December 1997 the Kyoto Protocol, which set limits for the emission of greenhouse gases was negotiated. In February 2005, 141 countries including the People's Republic of China had ratified the agreement. The United States has not ratified the protocol due to concern over some details, in particular that most provisions of the Kyoto protocol apply only to developed countries.
Suchita Vemuri Staff Writer 24th February 2005
Hi Joseph, China's oil demand has been growing at an average 7% since 1990, and while it's now the second largest oil consumer after the USA, its consumption in 2004 was around six million barrels per day, against a little over 20 in the USA. But if the current trend continues, China's consumption is expected to equal that of the USA by the mid-2020s.