|
Bertelsmann Transformation Index > Management Index 2006
|
2 |
|
[114th of 118]
|
|
Bertelsmann Transformation Index > Status Index 2006
|
3.38 |
|
[105th of 119]
|
|
DEFINITION: The Status Index’s overall result represents the mean value of the scores for the dimensions “Political Transformation� and “Economic Transformation�. The mean value was calculated using the exact, unrounded values for both these dimensions, which, in turn, were derived from the ratings for the five political criteria (based on 18 indicators) and the seven economic criteria (based on 14 indicators). The table shows rounded scores for political and economic transformation as well as for the Status Index’s overall result. In some cases, therefore, the overall result differs slightly from the mean value. |
|
SOURCE: Bertelsmann Transformation Index online, 2006 |
|
Bertelsmann Transformation Index>Political Transformation
|
3.97 |
|
[87th of 119]
|
|
DEFINITION: Political Transformation
The score for �Political Transformation“
is obtained by
calculating the mean value of the
ratings for the following criteria:
· Stateness
· Political Participation
· Rule of Law
· Stability of Democratic
Institutions
· Political and Social
Integration |
|
SOURCE: Bertelsmann Transformation Index online, 2006 |
|
Civil and political liberties
|
1.5 |
|
[99th of 140]
|
DEFINITION: Civil and political liberties Units: Index Ranging from 7 (High Levels of Liberties) to 1 (Low Units: This is the average of two indicators - civil liberties and political liberties. |
|
SOURCE: http://www.bertelsmann-transformation-index.de/fileadmin/pdf/BTI_2006_Ranking_GB.pdf |
|
CPIA gender equality rating
|
2.5
|
|
[69th of 75]
|
|
DEFINITION: Gender equality assesses the extent to which the country has installed institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that promote equal access for men and women in education, health, the economy, and protection under law. |
View time series
|
|
SOURCE: Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2000-2001, New York: Freedom House, 2001 |
|
CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating
|
1.5
|
|
[75th of 75]
|
|
DEFINITION: Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector assess the extent to which the executive can be held accountable for its use of funds and for the results of its actions by the electorate and by the legislature and judiciary, and the extent to which public employees within the executive are required to account for administrative decisions, use of resources, and results obtained. The three main dimensions assessed here are the accountability of the executive to oversight institutions and of public employees for their performance, access of civil society to information on public affairs, and state capture by narrow vested interests. |
View time series
|
|
SOURCE: World Development Indicators database |
|
Electoral system
|
first-past-the-post |
|
|
|
DEFINITION: worldpolicy.org |
|
SOURCE: World Development Indicators database |
|
Electoral system type
|
plurality |
|
|
|
DEFINITION: worldpolicy.org |
|
SOURCE: No comment is being made on the state of democracy. Categorizations are based on the electoral law, or the last competitive election held |
|
Female candidacy
|
1,978 |
|
[4th of 161]
|
|
DEFINITION: Year in which women received the right to stand for election. Data refer to the year in which right to vote or stand for election on a universal and equal basis was recognized. Where two years are shown, the first refers to the first partial recognition of the right to stand for election. |
|
SOURCE: No comment is being made on the state of democracy. Categorizations are based on the electoral law, or the last competitive election held |
|
Female ministers
|
13.6% |
|
[59th of 125]
|
|
DEFINITION: Women in government at ministerial level in 2000 (as % of total). Data were provided by states based on their definition of national executive and may therefore include women serving as ministers and vice ministers and those holding other ministerial positions, including parliamentary secretaries. |
|
SOURCE: IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 1995. Women in Parliaments 1945-1995: A World Statistical Survey. Geneva and IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2001. Correspondence on year women received the right to vote and to stand for election and year first woman was elected or appointed to parliament. March. Geneva |
|
Female parliamentarians
|
10% |
|
[90th of 157]
|
|
DEFINITION: Seats in parliament held by women (as % of total). Data are as of 8 March 2002. Where there are lower and upper houses, data refer to the weighted average of women's shares of seats in both houses. |
|
SOURCE: IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2001. Correspondence on women in government at the ministerial level. March. Geneva |
|
Female suffrage
|
1957 |
|
|
|
DEFINITION: Year in which women received the right to vote. Data refer to the year in which right to vote or stand for election on a universal and equal basis was recognized. Where two years are shown, the first refers to the first partial recognition of the right to vote. |
|
SOURCE: calculated on the basis of data on parliamentary seats from IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2002. Parline Database. March 2002 |
First female parliamentarian 1980 (elected and appointed) |
|
DEFINITION: Year first woman elected or appointed to parliament. |
|
SOURCE: IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 1995. Women in Parliaments 1945-1995: A World Statistical Survey. Geneva and IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2001. Correspondence on year women received the right to vote and to stand for election and year first woman was elected or appointed to parliament. March. Geneva |
|
Homosexuality laws of the world > Homosexuality laws > Laws against homosexuality
|
Male only |
|
|
|
DEFINITION:
|
|
SOURCE: IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 1995. Women in Parliaments 1945-1995: A World Statistical Survey. Geneva and IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2001. Correspondence on year women received the right to vote and to stand for election and year first woman was elected or appointed to parliament. March. Geneva. |
|
Presidential elections > Invalid votes
|
1.6% |
|
[38th of 61]
|
|
DEFINITION: The number of invalid votes, as reported by each country. |
|
SOURCE: Wikipedia: Homosexuality laws of the world
|
|
Presidential elections > Registered voter turnout
|
54.3% |
|
[77th of 86]
|
|
DEFINITION: The proportion of registered voters who actually voted. |
|
SOURCE: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2003 |
|
Presidential elections > Total vote
|
3,046,890 |
|
[36th of 87]
|
|
DEFINITION: The total number of votes cast in the relevant election. Total vote includes valid and invalid votes, as well as blank votes in cases where these are separated from invalid votes. More information on valid, invalid and blank votes can be found at aceproject.org |
|
SOURCE: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2003 |
|
Presidential elections > Voter registration
|
5,607,800 |
|
[30th of 86]
|
|
DEFINITION: The number of registered voters. The figure represents the number of names on the voters' register at the time that the registration process closes, as reported by the electoral management body. |
|
SOURCE: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2003 |
|
Presidential elections > Voting age population
|
5,839,000 |
|
[36th of 91]
|
|
DEFINITION: International IDEA has chosen to use not only the reported registration rate to calculate turnout percentages, but also the voting age population (VAP) which includes all citizens above the legal voting age |
|
SOURCE: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2003 |
|
Vote counting technology
|
manual |
|
|
|
SOURCE: Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance 2003 |