maddylissy 11th October 2011 |
Wow america you stink |
BRH 23rd July 2011 |
How is Carbon Dioxide per capita calculated??? |
usaterrorist 17th July 2011 |
"Where is CHINA???
CHINA is the #1 CO2 emitter country, yet that FACT is conveniently covered up because some people like to divide up their CO2 output by their 1.3+ billion population.
Isn't that special... "
"Environment Statistics > Pollution > Carbon Dioxide per capita (most recent) by country "
You sir, are a moron |
uramoron 17th July 2011 |
"Where is CHINA???
CHINA is the #1 CO2 emitter country, yet that FACT is conveniently covered up because some people like to divide up their CO2 output by their 1.3+ billion population.
Isn't that special... "
"Environment Statistics > Pollution > Carbon Dioxide per capita (most recent) by country "
you sir, are a moron. |
eecs 17th September 2010 |
Per capita is what is important. Mind you, environmental conservation is not a race between countries, it is a global effort together.
As far as nature is concerned, China isn't an entity. We're all in the same boat, and if they can emit less per capita, that's what matters.
And not only that, China has done one thing great, and that is getting its act together to control that 1.3 billion population. And with China so rapidly developing better public transit systems and alternative energy technologies, I think the problem is actually back home, where we waste on SUV's, 5000-watt electric clothes dryers and living in sprawled, inefficient suburbia. |
person 29th March 2010 |
global warming says
'hello" |
Javed 22nd February 2010 |
Polution |
Sean 15th December 2009 |
How recent is this data? I just see 1998 mentioned. |
Sean 15th December 2009 |
Joe, Europe does not have a single currency, it has multiple currencies. The UK for example still has the pound (sterling) and does not use the euro.
You cannot calculate the per capita pollution from Europe from the data above. You need to know the actual CO2 numbers and the population of each country and re-compute the equation. It is not simply a matter of summing the numbers. I agree that it would be interesting to see the overall EU number but I would expect it to be lower than the US given the average home sizes and cars are smaller.
|
what's your point 13th December 2009 |
You act like because China and India aren't on the list that it's some sort of conspiracy.
China has three times the population of the US but only recently surpassed it as the #1 CO2 emitting country.
This reflects poorly on the US NOT on China. They have a huge population, their CO2 usage is completely expected.
What's disgusting is how entitled Americans think they are. One single American uses the most amount of energy in the world. |
antispin 7th December 2009 |
Where is CHINA???
CHINA is the #1 CO2 emitter country, yet that FACT is conveniently covered up because some people like to divide up their CO2 output by their 1.3+ billion population.
Isn't that special... |
fREAK 27th November 2009 |
India and China are not even in the list, as their populations are high so per capita must be very low |
joe 26th November 2009 |
So actually the EU is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide per capita. Since the EU is under one leader and has a trade block with the same currency its only fair to state they pollute the most. |
sharon 16th July 2009 |
and yet the united states criticizes china for its environmental problems? per person, china compares minimally to the us pollution. china has a population four times the americans. |
daniel 28th April 2005 |
i need to see pollution graphs for trinidad and tobago |
Ian Graham Staff Editor 31st March 2005 |
Researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Monitoring Diagnostics Laboratory on Mauna Loa volcano in Hawaii say the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) there has reached a new high of 378 parts per million. They also report that the annual growth rate of CO2, which has increased every year since 1958, has been about twice as high in the past decade as it was in the 1960s. However, the increase in the past year was lower than in the previous two years. The Mauna Loa lab, located 3,500 meters (11,500 feet) above sea level, is ideal for atmospheric research because there is no obvious pollution source or natural sink, such as a forest, nearby. |