FACTOID # 3: Indonesia contains the most known mammal species - and the most mammal species under threat.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RELATED STATS
People who viewed "Environment > Pollution > Carbon Dioxide per capita" also viewed these world stats:
Search for: pollution per capita; graph of countries environment pollutants in 1998
RECENT UPDATES
More Recent Updates »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Environment Statistics > Pollution > Carbon Dioxide per capita (most recent) by country

VIEW DATA:   Totals  
Definition     Source      Printable version   
    Bar Graph   Map   Correlations  

Showing latest available data.
Rank   Countries  Amount 
# 1   United States: 20 
= 2   Australia: 17 
= 2   Luxembourg: 17 
# 4   Canada: 16 
= 5   Finland: 12 
= 5   Czech Republic: 12 
= 5   Belgium: 12 
= 8   Denmark: 11 
= 8   Netherlands: 11 
= 10   Germany: 10 
= 10   Ireland: 10 
= 12   United Kingdom:
= 12   Japan:
= 14   Iceland:
= 14   Norway:
= 14   Austria:
= 14   Korea, South:
= 14   Poland:
= 14   New Zealand:
= 14   Greece:
# 21   Italy:
= 22   Switzerland:
= 22   France:
= 22   Spain:
= 22   Hungary:
= 22   Sweden:
# 27   Portugal:
# 28   Mexico:
# 29   Turkey:
Weighted average: 9.3  



DEFINITION: Tons of Carbon Dioxide produced per capita in 1998 or latest available year. Carbon dioxide from energy use only. Excludes international marine bunkers.

SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France, OECD Environmental Data Compendium

See also

Related links:

 

COMMENTARY     

Sean
15th December 2009
How recent is this data? I just see 1998 mentioned.
Sean
15th December 2009
Joe, Europe does not have a single currency, it has multiple currencies. The UK for example still has the pound (sterling) and does not use the euro.

You cannot calculate the per capita pollution from Europe from the data above. You need to know the actual CO2 numbers and the population of each country and re-compute the equation. It is not simply a matter of summing the numbers. I agree that it would be interesting to see the overall EU number but I would expect it to be lower than the US given the average home sizes and cars are smaller.
what's your point
14th December 2009
You act like because China and India aren't on the list that it's some sort of conspiracy.

China has three times the population of the US but only recently surpassed it as the #1 CO2 emitting country.

This reflects poorly on the US NOT on China. They have a huge population, their CO2 usage is completely expected.

What's disgusting is how entitled Americans think they are. One single American uses the most amount of energy in the world.
antispin
8th December 2009
Where is CHINA???

CHINA is the #1 CO2 emitter country, yet that FACT is conveniently covered up because some people like to divide up their CO2 output by their 1.3+ billion population.

Isn't that special...
fREAK
28th November 2009
India and China are not even in the list, as their populations are high so per capita must be very low
joe
26th November 2009
So actually the EU is the largest emitter of carbon dioxide per capita. Since the EU is under one leader and has a trade block with the same currency its only fair to state they pollute the most.
daniel
28th April 2005
i need to see pollution graphs for trinidad and tobago
Ian Graham
Staff Editor

1st April 2005
Researchers at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Climate Monitoring Diagnostics Laboratory on Mauna Loa volcano in Hawaii say the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) there has reached a new high of 378 parts per million.

They also report that the annual growth rate of CO2, which has increased every year since 1958, has been about twice as high in the past decade as it was in the 1960s. However, the increase in the past year was lower than in the previous two years.

The Mauna Loa lab, located 3,500 meters (11,500 feet) above sea level, is ideal for atmospheric research because there is no obvious pollution source or natural sink, such as a forest, nearby.

There are 5 more (non-authoritative) comments on this page

Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
© Copyright NationMaster.com 2003-2010. All Rights Reserved. Usage implies agreement with terms.