|
Bertelsmann Transformation Index > Management Index 2006
|
4.44 |
|
[72nd of 118]
|
|
Bertelsmann Transformation Index > Status Index 2006
|
4.6 |
|
[80th of 119]
|
|
DEFINITION: The Status Index’s overall result represents the mean value of the scores for the dimensions “Political Transformation� and “Economic Transformation�. The mean value was calculated using the exact, unrounded values for both these dimensions, which, in turn, were derived from the ratings for the five political criteria (based on 18 indicators) and the seven economic criteria (based on 14 indicators). The table shows rounded scores for political and economic transformation as well as for the Status Index’s overall result. In some cases, therefore, the overall result differs slightly from the mean value. |
|
SOURCE: Bertelsmann Transformation Index online, 2006 |
|
Bertelsmann Transformation Index>Political Transformation
|
4.23 |
|
[76th of 119]
|
|
DEFINITION: Political Transformation
The score for �Political Transformation“
is obtained by
calculating the mean value of the
ratings for the following criteria:
· Stateness
· Political Participation
· Rule of Law
· Stability of Democratic
Institutions
· Political and Social
Integration |
|
SOURCE: Bertelsmann Transformation Index online, 2006 |
|
Civil and political liberties
|
0.5 |
|
[131st of 140]
|
DEFINITION: Civil and political liberties Units: Index Ranging from 7 (High Levels of Liberties) to 1 (Low Units: This is the average of two indicators - civil liberties and political liberties. |
|
SOURCE: http://www.bertelsmann-transformation-index.de/fileadmin/pdf/BTI_2006_Ranking_GB.pdf |
|
CPIA gender equality rating
|
3.5
|
|
[43rd of 75]
|
|
DEFINITION: Gender equality assesses the extent to which the country has installed institutions and programs to enforce laws and policies that promote equal access for men and women in education, health, the economy, and protection under law. |
View time series
|
|
SOURCE: Freedom House, Freedom in the World 2000-2001, New York: Freedom House, 2001 |
|
CPIA policies for social inclusion/equity cluster average
|
3.6
|
|
[23rd of 75]
|
|
DEFINITION: The policies for social inclusion and equity cluster includes gender equality, equity of public resource use, building human resources, social protection and labor, and policies and institutions for environmental sustainability. |
View time series
|
|
SOURCE: World Development Indicators database |
|
CPIA property rights and rule-based governance rating
|
3
|
|
[36th of 75]
|
|
DEFINITION: Property rights and rule-based governance assess the extent to which private economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced. |
View time series
|
|
SOURCE: World Development Indicators database |
|
CPIA public sector management and institutions cluster average
|
3.3
|
|
[26th of 75]
|
|
DEFINITION: The public sector management and institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector. |
View time series
|
|
SOURCE: World Development Indicators database |
|
CPIA transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector rating
|
3
|
|
[33rd of 75]
|
|
DEFINITION: Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector assess the extent to which the executive can be held accountable for its use of funds and for the results of its actions by the electorate and by the legislature and judiciary, and the extent to which public employees within the executive are required to account for administrative decisions, use of resources, and results obtained. The three main dimensions assessed here are the accountability of the executive to oversight institutions and of public employees for their performance, access of civil society to information on public affairs, and state capture by narrow vested interests. |
View time series
|
|
SOURCE: World Development Indicators database |
|
Electoral system
|
first-past-the-post |
|
|
|
DEFINITION: worldpolicy.org |
|
SOURCE: World Development Indicators database |
|
Electoral system type
|
plurality |
|
|
|
DEFINITION: worldpolicy.org |
|
SOURCE: No comment is being made on the state of democracy. Categorizations are based on the electoral law, or the last competitive election held |
|
Female candidacy
|
1,961 |
|
[39th of 161]
|
|
DEFINITION: Year in which women received the right to stand for election. Data refer to the year in which right to vote or stand for election on a universal and equal basis was recognized. Where two years are shown, the first refers to the first partial recognition of the right to stand for election. |
|
SOURCE: No comment is being made on the state of democracy. Categorizations are based on the electoral law, or the last competitive election held |
|
Female ministers
|
10% |
|
[78th of 125]
|
|
DEFINITION: Women in government at ministerial level in 2000 (as % of total). Data were provided by states based on their definition of national executive and may therefore include women serving as ministers and vice ministers and those holding other ministerial positions, including parliamentary secretaries. |
|
SOURCE: IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 1995. Women in Parliaments 1945-1995: A World Statistical Survey. Geneva and IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2001. Correspondence on year women received the right to vote and to stand for election and year first woman was elected or appointed to parliament. March. Geneva |
|
Female parliamentarians
|
25.7% |
|
[18th of 157]
|
|
DEFINITION: Seats in parliament held by women (as % of total). Data are as of 8 March 2002. Where there are lower and upper houses, data refer to the weighted average of women's shares of seats in both houses. |
|
SOURCE: IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2001. Correspondence on women in government at the ministerial level. March. Geneva |
|
Female suffrage
|
1961 |
|
|
|
DEFINITION: Year in which women received the right to vote. Data refer to the year in which right to vote or stand for election on a universal and equal basis was recognized. Where two years are shown, the first refers to the first partial recognition of the right to vote. |
|
SOURCE: calculated on the basis of data on parliamentary seats from IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2002. Parline Database. March 2002 |
|
First female parliamentarian
|
1965 |
|
|
|
DEFINITION: Year first woman elected or appointed to parliament. |
|
SOURCE: IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 1995. Women in Parliaments 1945-1995: A World Statistical Survey. Geneva and IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2001. Correspondence on year women received the right to vote and to stand for election and year first woman was elected or appointed to parliament. March. Geneva |
|
Gender Parity Index in primary level enrolment
|
1.01664706195688 |
|
[12th of 183]
|
|
SOURCE: IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 1995. Women in Parliaments 1945-1995: A World Statistical Survey. Geneva and IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2001. Correspondence on year women received the right to vote and to stand for election and year first woman was elected or appointed to parliament. March. Geneva. |
View time series
|
|
Homosexuality laws of the world > Homosexuality laws > Laws against homosexuality
|
No* |
|
|
|
DEFINITION:
|
|
SOURCE: Source: Millennium Development Goals Database | United Nations Statistics Division |