FACTOID # 2: On the probability of not reaching 40 graph, the top 34 countries are all African.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
RELATED STATS
People who viewed "Health > Death from cancer" also viewed these world stats:
Search for: statistics death by cancer per country; graph of alcohol related deaths in the past 20 years
TOP STATS
Which countries have the most:
More Top Stats »
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT UPDATES
More Recent Updates »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Health Statistics > Death from cancer (most recent) by country

VIEW DATA:   Totals  
Definition     Source      Printable version   
    Bar Graph   Pie Chart   Map   Correlations  

Showing latest available data.

Click on a region to zoom in and then mouseover to view country names.  Show map full screen
Legend: 
  433 334 254
 
 
(No data)


Rank   Countries  Amount 
# 1     Netherlands: 433 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 2     Italy: 418 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 3     Hungary: 411 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 4     Luxembourg: 409.7 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 5     Slovakia: 405.3 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 6     Ireland: 357.6 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 7     Czech Republic: 335.4 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 8     New Zealand: 327.3 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 9     United States: 321.9 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 10     Australia: 298.9 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 11     Norway: 289.4 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 12     France: 286.1 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 13     Austria: 280 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 14     Sweden: 268.2 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 15     Finland: 255.4 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
# 16     United Kingdom: 253.5 deaths per 100,000 peopl 
Total: 5,350.7 deaths per 100,000 peopl  
Weighted average: 334.4 deaths per 100,000 peopl  


DEFINITION: Cancer death incidence (per 100 000 population) for year 2000.

See also

Related links:

   

Compare countries:

Country 1:
Country 2:
Category:

CITATION

"Death from cancer by country", OECD Health Data 2004. Retrieved from http://www.NationMaster.com/red/graph/hea_dea_fro_can-health-death-from-cancer&b_map=1

Change citation style: APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT
TOP HEALTH STATS
 

COMMENTARY     

Rdizzy
15th January 2012
http://www.earth-policy.org/plan_b_updates/2011/update96

Article-Cancer now the leading cause of death in China.
WTF???
30th September 2011
What idiot posts an article with (Most Recent) in the title. Really, this is the most recent? Your comments go back to 2004.
Jebaraj+K.
3rd July 2011
What about India? Where are we going toward?
winona hinkel
2nd February 2011
I do not see statistics for Korea on your list.
bosc
27th January 2011
Hey Cueball

The link is entirely in the food. And not in the way that you might think. Its not entirely or even primarily the additives or pestisides that can be found in food. It is the link between meat/milk and to a lesser degree process food that really shed light on itself and the link between food and cancers. Notice the list and what they have in common many are wealthier countries and high meat/milk consuming countries. Thats why you will never see countries like India or China on this list because their consumption levels are too low, many of the rural (poorer) people base their diets around plant based food therefore they have less chronic deiseases like cancer, heart disease (leader killer in north america), parkisans, diabetes and many more. The problem is not many people are willing to give up their high meat/consuming diets but the switch from that to a more plant based not processed food diet doesn't only have the long term benefits of less chronic diseases but the short term effects of higher energy levels; You just look and feel better. When you really think about it what is more fundamental to what happens to our bodies than the food we put into it, it makes sense even on a very logical level. But look into it for yourself. You might want to read a book call "the china study" which is also the name of the longest running dietary examanation of diet and disease.
Lela
23rd December 2010
@RickyB

Read the article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12054984

Yes, Canada has public health care system, and the latest news published in Lancet it exceeds in cancer survival rate along with Australia and Sweden.
cueball.
9th December 2010
Is there any reason why there is not any real in depth research
into why the cancer rates have exploded in the last 40 years.

Like water supply, food, air pollution, additives. or is it easy just to blame. smoking, or is it down to financial gain.

THERE IS A LINK SOMEWHERE.
Cate
29th November 2010
I have a question. why are there no countries like africa on this list? Do they have a lower possibility of Cancer because they have other diseases, or do they just not know what the statistics are in africa for cancer.
Bogus Alias
6th November 2010
What is the ratio of those making a living off cancer
compared to the number of those dying from it? Enquiring mind would like to know.
Bangash
20th October 2010
This is a very sad statistic list, my mother also suffers from this horrible disease.
Vince
18th October 2010
No, Robert, it isn't.

And pearl jam, that is also wrong. The world statistics for skin cancer are freely available and that is quite clearly false.
robert
31st August 2010
The reason asian countries are not on the list is due to low meat and dairy consumption.
CB
25th August 2010
The bad news: If a man lives long enough he'll get prostate cancer. The good news: of 100,000 deaths only 322 will be related to it (in the US). Not a major concern imo.
Yeah Right
21st June 2010
I wouldn't trust a websites 411 that can't sort numbers from smallest to largest.
Tom Altren
20th April 2010
The reason why African, South American and Asian countries are not included is very simple - they don't suffer from the abundance disease. They have less protein and fat in their diets and much more carbohydrates (plant based diets). Several studies show that high protein diets are carcinogenic (see China Study for reference).
So even though in "poor" countries the health care is not able to fight and/or diagnose cancer in many cases, they are still in much better position then citizens of Western countries. They are less likely to develop cancer at all.
Mr Man
1st December 2009
David Elliott Lewis, Ph.D. the reason you dont see countries from the 3rd world, like Africa, is because of at least two reasons.

First there life expectancy might be very low and cancer usually shows up in mid to late in life. So people die before cancer gets to them.

Secondly, and more importantly for a list like this is the ability to count the people with cancer. Cancer rates may be very high in an African country but if the people don't know they have it or can not report it due to lack of hospital facilities and/or possibly government interference. The poor souls can't be counted and thus will never show up on a list.
Michael Z. Williamson
25th November 2009
5,350.7 deaths per 1.6 MILLION people--it's an additive property. You add the total of deaths AND the total ratio base.

This graph is very badly done and misleading.
pearl jam
23rd November 2009
AND WHITE PEOPLE ARE 100% MORE LIKELY TO DIE OF SKIN CANCER. PERIOD.
David Elliott Lewis, Ph.D.
19th November 2009
I find it very strange that no countries from Africa, Latin America or Asia (except Japan) are on this list. Why is that?
ec
14th November 2009
This is really great.
Austin Fifield
29th October 2009
I need something that has asia not just the ones you gys like
Sue
23rd August 2009
I read the graph to indicate the number
of deaths. Fewer deaths in UK than
Norway thus the ranking.
JDR
14th August 2009
How are you interpreting the OECD data?

These numbers differ from the OECD Health Data Frequently Requested Data available from their website which you site as the source.

http://www.irdes.fr/EcoSante/DownLoad/OECDHealthData_FrequentlyRequestedData.xls


StuRat
18th July 2009
Your graph is badly messed up:

1) Your numbers are backwards. That is, the UK should have the worst numbers, not the best.

2) Austria, for some reason, doesn't sort properly. Even though it's rank is 13th, it sorts out between 3 and 4 instead of 12 and 14.

Please fix it.
Ian Graham
Staff Editor

19th May 2005
African Americans are more likely to die from cancer than any other racial or ethnic group. Although cancer death rates are dropping among African Americans in the United States, the gap between blacks and whites remains large, according to the American Cancer Society.

A new report estimates that there will be 137,910 new cases of cancer among African Americans in 2005, and 63,110 cancer deaths. The overall death rate from all cancers combined declined by 1.6 percent among African Americans each year between 1993 and 2001, which is greater than the 1 percent yearly decline seen among whites in the same period.

However, lung cancer rates are 47% higher among African-American men than white men. The death rate from lung cancer is 36% higher than for white men. Lung cancer is expected to claim 15,500 lives among African Americans in 2005.

Colon cancer rates are also higher among African Americans than whites. Colon cancer is the third-leading cause of cancer death among African-American men and women. It is expected to kill about 7,080 African Americans in 2005.

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among African-American women, and the second leading cause of cancer death. About 19,240 new cases are expected this year. Breast cancer is actually less common among African-American women than white women, except in the case of women under 40. But African-American women are more likely to die from it. About 5,640 black women are expected to die of breast cancer this year.

Prostate cancer rates are 60% higher in African-American men than white men and death rates are nearly two-and-a-half times higher. About 30,770 prostate cancer cases and 5,050 deaths are expected in 2005.

Ian Graham
Staff Editor

17th May 2005
Adult survivors of childhood cancers face an increased risk of suffering from health problems including heart disease, infertility and kidney disease, according to the Childhood Cancer Survivors Study. By the time they are 45, those who survived childhood cancer are four times as likely as cancer-free siblings to report severe health conditions.

The study compared the health status of 10,397 survivors of childhood cancers diagnosed and treated between 1970 and 1986, with the health status of more than 3,034 healthy siblings. It found that survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma are 4.4 times more likely to have more than two serious medical conditions – such as a second malignant neoplasm, myocardial infarction (heart attack), coronary artery bypass surgery, heart transplant, end-stage kidney disease, or paralysis – than cancer-free siblings. Chest radiation and anthracycline-based chemotherapy treatments carried the highest risk for long-term complications.

The median survival rate for childhood cancers in the United States is almost at 80%, but at least two-thirds of childhood cancer survivors develop chronic health conditions associated with cancer treatment and a third have serious, life-threatening conditions.

Ian Graham
Staff Editor

14th April 2005
The most commonly diagnosed non-skin cancer in the United States, prostate cancer will afflict one in six American men over the course of his lifetime and an American man is actually 33 percent more likely to develop prostate cancer than an American woman is to develop breast cancer.

The Prostate Cancer Foundation says that over 232,000 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2005, and 30,000 men will die from it. It is estimated that there are over 2 million American men currently living with prostate cancer.

In the United States, one new case of prostate cancer occurs every 2.5 minutes and a man dies from the disease every 17 minutes. The chance of developing prostate cancer increases rapidly after age 50. More than 70 percent of all prostate cancers are diagnosed in men over the age of 65.

Prostate cancer is the second-leading cause (next to lung cancer) of cancer-related deaths among men in the U.S. African-American men are 65 percent more likely to be diagnosed with prostate cancer than Caucasian-Americans and are more than twice as likely to die from it.

However, because prostate cancer is a relatively slow-growing cancer, the 5-year survival rate for prostate cancer diagnosed at all stages is 98%. The 10-year survival rate is 84% and the 15-year survival rate is 56%.

Edria Murray
Staff Editor

14th April 2005
In response to cindycooke:

The prostate is part of the male reproductive system and is located just below the bladder. The function of the prostate is to produce some of the fluid for semen which transports sperm.

Worldwide, more than 650,000 men are diagnosed with prostate cancer every year, accounting for a tenth of all new male cancers. Prostate cancer usually occurs in men over 70 years old with very few cases diagnosed in men under 50. Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men after lung cancer. Unlike other cancers, lifestyle factors do not appear to considerably increase risk the main known risk factors are age, ethnicity and family history.

The survival rate for prostate cancer patients has doubled over the last twenty-five years. The five-year survival rate is now 65% with higher survival rates if the cancer is detected early. National statistics on prostate cancer mortality can be found in the mortality category.

The highest incidence rates are in the developed world and the lowest rates in Africa and Asia. This trend may not reflect actual incidence as the availability of screening tests is significantly higher in developed countries especially the United States. In addition to this, men in Africa and Asia have a lower probability of reaching age 65 so fewer men reach the age when prostate cancer is most likely to occur.
Ian Graham
Staff Editor

3rd April 2005
A study published in the International Journal of Cancer, based on a comparison of 585 people with pancreatic and 4,779 people without the diseases, suggests that the risk of this particular cancer decreases as fruit and vegetable consumption increases.

A large study of Canadians diagnosed with cancer between 1994 and 1997 found that eating more fresh fruit and cruciferous vegetables, such as broccoli and cauliflower, was associated with a lower risk of pancreatic cancer. However, the relationship between the two was confined to men. There was no clear association between diet and pancreatic cancer risk among women.

Among cancers, pancreatic tumors have one of the lowest survival rates, with less than five percent of patients living for five years after being diagnosed. This is mainly because the disease is rarely caught early.

Kimmy
30th November 2004
Why isn't there more countries?!!?!?!?!?
This is so frustrating!
Desiree Campbell
21st November 2004
Do you have maps of lung cancer
There are 40 more (non-authoritative) comments on this page

Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
© Copyright NationMaster.com 2003-2013. All Rights Reserved. Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m