Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Australia & Belarus

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Australia	Belarus
Consumption	27.56 billion cu m Ranked 19th. 26% more than Belarus	21.82 billion cu m Ranked 23th.
Consumption > Per capita	1.44 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 19th.	2.24 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 56% more than Australia
Consumption per capita	1,220.91 cu m Ranked 14th.	1,788.16 cu m Ranked 9th. 46% more than Australia
Imports	10.92 billion cu m Ranked 22nd.	21.02 billion cu m Ranked 15th. 92% more than Australia
Imports per capita	301.21 cu m Ranked 30th.	1,851.27 cu m Ranked 2nd. 6 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	19,806 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 9% more than Belarus	18,152 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	136,206 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Belarus	54,187 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	2.07 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Belarus	0.424 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	11.26 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Belarus	5.14 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	52.58 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	81.56 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 55% more than Australia
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	24.02 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 63% more than Belarus	14.69 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	1.44 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 119 times more than Belarus	0.0121 Terajoules Ranked 85th.
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	141,171.89 cu m Ranked 15th. 473 times more than Belarus	298.42 cu m Ranked 81st.
Proved reserves	1.22 trillion cu m Ranked 23th. 430 times more than Belarus	2.83 billion cu m Ranked 92nd.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.91 Ranked 27th. 32% more than Belarus	0.69 Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	11.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Belarus	5.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	365,811 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	428,318 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 17% more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.971 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 93% more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	806.14 Terajoules Ranked 14th.	1,031.15 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 28% more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	3.02 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	5.31 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 76% more than Australia
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	52.58 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	81.56 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 55% more than Australia
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	81.21 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 89 times more than Belarus	0.911 Terajoules Ranked 70th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	80.83 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 89 times more than Belarus	0.911 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	1.1 Ranked 20th.	1.71 Ranked 11th. 55% more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.91 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 43% more than Belarus	6.22 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	22.1 Ranked 27th. 33% more than Belarus	16.6 Ranked 32nd.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2005 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.974 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.	1.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 91% more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	2.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 5 times more than Belarus	0.419 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	45,376 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 9 times more than Belarus	4,789 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	2.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Belarus	0.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	808.75 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 14th.	1,019.27 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 12th. 26% more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	16,441 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 65% more than Belarus	9,964 Terajoules Ranked 17th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	229,668 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 5 times more than Belarus	49,629 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	61,613 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 20% more than Belarus	51,329 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	5,580 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	158,273 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 28 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	99 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	1,159 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 12 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.295 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.	16.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 55 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.	43.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 2 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	52.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.	80.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 53% more than Australia
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	385,013 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	586,591 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 52% more than Australia
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.	60.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	52.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.	80.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 53% more than Australia
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	1.07 million Terajoules Ranked 25th. 36% more than Belarus	788,159 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	1.66 million Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 188 times more than Belarus	8,806 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Net > Production	1.65 million Terajoules Ranked 20th. 187 times more than Belarus	8,806 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	489,792 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Belarus	141,974 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	24.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 66% more than Belarus	14.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	1,449.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 121 times more than Belarus	11.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 87th.
Including LNG > Total resources	29.46 million Terajoules Ranked 28th. 252 times more than Belarus	117,063 Terajoules Ranked 89th.
Proved > Reserves	3.12 trillion cu m Ranked 12th. 1100 times more than Belarus	2.83 billion cu m Ranked 89th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	42,196 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 10 times more than Belarus	4,094 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	24.5 Ranked 27th. 32% more than Belarus	18.5 Ranked 32nd.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.91 Ranked 27th. 32% more than Belarus	0.69 Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.88 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	60.7 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	2.22 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Belarus	0.496 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	806.14 Terajoules Ranked 14th.	1,031.15 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 28% more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	4.85 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	119.94 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 25 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.94 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	44.33 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 2 times more than Australia
Proved reserves per capita	54,755.75 cu m Ranked 23th. 186 times more than Belarus	294.21 cu m Ranked 86th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	6.68 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 19% more than Belarus	5.61 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	14.3 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 92% more than Belarus	7.44 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	14.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 95% more than Belarus	7.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	181,681 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Belarus	60,135 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 45% more than Belarus	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	291,670 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Belarus	71,875 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	3.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th.	5.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 73% more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	808.75 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 14th.	1,019.27 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 12th. 26% more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	16,441 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 65% more than Belarus	9,964 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	4.87 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 34th.	118.56 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 23th. 24 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	1.07 million Terajoules Ranked 25th. 36% more than Belarus	788,159 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-55,215,048,082.003 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 40th.	44.87 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 4th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	1.22 Ranked 20th.	1.9 Ranked 11th. 56% more than Australia
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	2.4 Ranked 27th. 33% more than Belarus	1.8 Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.295 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	16.38 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 56 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	6.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 21% more than Belarus	5.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Australia and Belarus in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Conflict	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather
Energy	Lifestyle

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Australia & Belarus

Definitions

Citation

Compare Australia and Belarus in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Australia and Belarus in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation