Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Australia & Burma

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Australia	Burma
Consumption	27.56 billion cu m Ranked 19th. 9 times more than Burma	3.24 billion cu m Ranked 51st.
Consumption > Per capita	1.44 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 18 times more than Burma	80,614.46 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.
Consumption per capita	1,220.91 cu m Ranked 14th. 16 times more than Burma	75.23 cu m Ranked 36th.
Imports	10.92 billion cu m Ranked 22nd.	0.0 Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	19,806 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 225 times more than Burma	88 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.974 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 487 times more than Burma	0.002 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	136,206 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 4865 times more than Burma	28 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	3.4 Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Burma	0.7 Ranked 40th.
Production > Billion cubic metres	35.2 Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Burma	7.4 Ranked 40th.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	1.31 Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Burma	0.27 Ranked 40th.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	1.75 Ranked 18th. 12 times more than Burma	0.148 Ranked 41st.
Proved reserves	1.22 trillion cu m Ranked 23th. 4 times more than Burma	283.2 billion cu m Ranked 38th.
Reserves	2.41 trillion cubic feet Ranked 9th. 8 times more than Burma	314.4 billion cubic feet Ranked 26th.
Reserves per capita	118,020.28 cubic feet Ranked 11th. 19 times more than Burma	6,265.32 cubic feet Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	126,437 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 23 times more than Burma	5,589 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	45,376 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 61% more than Burma	28,170 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	2.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Burma	0.558 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	808.75 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 14th. 327 times more than Burma	2.47 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	16,441 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 132 times more than Burma	125 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.467 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 12 times more than Burma	0.038 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	9,484 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 5 times more than Burma	1,941 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	229,668 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 11 times more than Burma	20,512 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	61,613 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 8 times more than Burma	7,636 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Exports	576,096 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 61% more than Burma	358,856 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	52.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 27 times more than Burma	1.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 89th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	385,013 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 11 times more than Burma	34,584 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 28 times more than Burma	0.685 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 87th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	0.384 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 128 times more than Burma	0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	52.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 27 times more than Burma	1.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 89th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	1.65 million Terajoules Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Burma	457,413 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	489,792 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 10 times more than Burma	48,807 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	24.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 25 times more than Burma	0.966 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 80th.
Proved > Reserves	3.12 trillion cu m Ranked 12th. 11 times more than Burma	283.2 billion cu m Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.88 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 27 times more than Burma	0.689 Terajoules Ranked 86th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	2.22 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Burma	0.561 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	806.14 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 324 times more than Burma	2.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.94 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 26 times more than Burma	0.689 Terajoules Ranked 83th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	1.31 Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Burma	0.27 Ranked 40th.
Proved reserves per capita	54,755.75 cu m Ranked 23th. 11 times more than Burma	5,133.47 cu m Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	6.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 6700 times more than Burma	0.001 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	0.382 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 116 times more than Burma	0.00329 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	31.7 Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Burma	6.6 Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	6.2 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 56 times more than Burma	0.111 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	11.26 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 28 times more than Burma	0.409 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	28.25 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Burma	7.15 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	52.58 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 27 times more than Burma	1.96 Terajoules Ranked 88th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	24.02 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 25 times more than Burma	0.973 Terajoules Ranked 78th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	141,171.89 cu m Ranked 15th. 26 times more than Burma	5,453.37 cu m Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	1.44 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 4 times more than Burma	0.377 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Imports per capita	301.21 cu m Ranked 30th.	0.0 Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	11.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 28 times more than Burma	0.406 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 73th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	365,811 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 11 times more than Burma	34,584 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.971 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 535 times more than Burma	0.00182 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.465 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 12 times more than Burma	0.0387 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	806.14 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 324 times more than Burma	2.49 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	3.02 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 20 times more than Burma	0.152 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	52.58 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 27 times more than Burma	1.96 Terajoules Ranked 88th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	81.21 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 9 times more than Burma	9.12 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	80.83 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 9 times more than Burma	9.12 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.91 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 16 times more than Burma	0.561 Terajoules Ranked 57th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	6.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 45 times more than Burma	0.149 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	135,921 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 18 times more than Burma	7,530 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	14.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 35 times more than Burma	0.406 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	181,681 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 6 times more than Burma	28,170 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 16 times more than Burma	0.558 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	291,670 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 14 times more than Burma	20,512 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	3.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 20 times more than Burma	0.151 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	808.75 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 14th. 327 times more than Burma	2.47 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	16,441 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 132 times more than Burma	125 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 26 times more than Burma	0.685 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 84th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented	7,800 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 47 times more than Burma	165 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	1.07 million Terajoules Ranked 25th. 11 times more than Burma	98,557 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	28.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 4 times more than Burma	7.1 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	1.07 million Terajoules Ranked 25th. 11 times more than Burma	98,557 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	1.66 million Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 4 times more than Burma	457,578 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	1,449.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 4 times more than Burma	374.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Total resources	29.46 million Terajoules Ranked 28th. 56% more than Burma	18.93 million Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-55,215,048,082.003 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 40th. 1266 times more than Burma	-43,614,023.739 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 54th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	1.57 Ranked 18th. 12 times more than Burma	0.132 Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	6.68 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 10970 times more than Burma	0.000609 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	6.66 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 44 times more than Burma	0.15 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	14.3 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 35 times more than Burma	0.409 Terajoules Ranked 75th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Australia and Burma in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Industry	Sports
Economy	Labor	Terrorism
Education	Language	Transport
Energy	Lifestyle

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Australia & Burma

Definitions

Citation

Compare Australia and Burma in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Australia and Burma in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation