×

Transport > Airports Stats: compare key data on Australia & Costa Rica

Compare vs for  

Definitions

  • Per $ GDP: Total number of airports. Runways must be useable, but may be unpaved. May not have facilities for refuelling, maintenance, or air traffic control. Per $ GDP figures expressed per 1 billion $ gross domestic product.
  • Per capita: Total number of airports. Runways must be useable, but may be unpaved. May not have facilities for refuelling, maintenance, or air traffic control. Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
  • With paved runways > 1,524 to 2,437 m: This entry is derived from Transport > Airports > With paved runways, which gives the total number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces) by length. For airports with more than one runway, only the longest runway is included according to the following five groups - (1) over 3,047 m (over 10,000 ft), (2) 2,438 to 3,047 m (8,000 to 10,000 ft), (3) 1,524 to 2,437 m (5,000 to 8,000 ft), (4) 914 to 1,523 m (3,000 to 5,000 ft), and (5) under 914 m (under 3,000 ft). Only airports with usable runways are included in this listing. Not all airports have facilities for refueling, maintenance, or air traffic control. The type aircraft capable of operating from a runway of a given length is dependent upon a number of factors including elevation of the runway, runway gradient, average maximum daily temperature at the airport, engine types, flap settings, and take-off weight of the aircraft.
  • With paved runways > 1524 to 2437 m: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway
  • With paved runways > 2438 to 3047 m > Per $ GDP: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per $ GDP figures expressed per 1 trillion $ gross domestic product.
  • With paved runways > 2438 to 3047 m > Per capita: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
  • With paved runways > 914 to 1,523 m: This entry is derived from Transport > Airports > With paved runways, which gives the total number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces) by length. For airports with more than one runway, only the longest runway is included according to the following five groups - (1) over 3,047 m (over 10,000 ft), (2) 2,438 to 3,047 m (8,000 to 10,000 ft), (3) 1,524 to 2,437 m (5,000 to 8,000 ft), (4) 914 to 1,523 m (3,000 to 5,000 ft), and (5) under 914 m (under 3,000 ft). Only airports with usable runways are included in this listing. Not all airports have facilities for refueling, maintenance, or air traffic control. The type aircraft capable of operating from a runway of a given length is dependent upon a number of factors including elevation of the runway, runway gradient, average maximum daily temperature at the airport, engine types, flap settings, and take-off weight of the aircraft.
  • With paved runways > 914 to 1,523 m per million people: This entry is derived from Transport > Airports > With paved runways, which gives the total number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces) by length. For airports with more than one runway, only the longest runway is included according to the following five groups - (1) over 3,047 m (over 10,000 ft), (2) 2,438 to 3,047 m (8,000 to 10,000 ft), (3) 1,524 to 2,437 m (5,000 to 8,000 ft), (4) 914 to 1,523 m (3,000 to 5,000 ft), and (5) under 914 m (under 3,000 ft). Only airports with usable runways are included in this listing. Not all airports have facilities for refueling, maintenance, or air traffic control. The type aircraft capable of operating from a runway of a given length is dependent upon a number of factors including elevation of the runway, runway gradient, average maximum daily temperature at the airport, engine types, flap settings, and take-off weight of the aircraft. Figures expressed per million people for the same year.
  • With paved runways > Total: Total number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces)
  • With paved runways > Total > Per $ GDP: Total number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces) Per $ GDP figures expressed per 1 billion $ gross domestic product.
  • With paved runways > Total > Per capita: Total number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces) Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
  • With paved runways > Under 914 m: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway
  • With unpaved runways > 914 to 1,523 m: This entry is derived from Transport > Airports > With unpaved runways, which gives the total number of airports with unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces) by length. For airports with more than one runway, only the longest runway is included according to the following five groups - (1) over 3,047 m (over 10,000 ft), (2) 2,438 to 3,047 m (8,000 to 10,000 ft), (3) 1,524 to 2,437 m (5,000 to 8,000 ft), (4) 914 to 1,523 m (3,000 to 5,000 ft), and (5) under 914 m (under 3,000 ft). Only airports with usable runways are included in this listing. Not all airports have facilities for refueling, maintenance, or air traffic control. The type aircraft capable of operating from a runway of a given length is dependent upon a number of factors including elevation of the runway, runway gradient, average maximum daily temperature at the airport, engine types, flap settings, and take-off weight of the aircraft.
  • With unpaved runways > Total: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces)
  • With unpaved runways > Under 914 m > Per $ GDP: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per $ GDP figures expressed per 1 trillion $ gross domestic product.
  • With unpaved runways > Total > Per capita: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces) Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
  • With paved runways > Under 914 m > Per $ GDP: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per $ GDP figures expressed per 1 trillion $ gross domestic product.
  • With paved runways > Under 914 m > Per capita: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
  • With unpaved runways > 914 to 1523 m > Per capita: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
  • With unpaved runways > 914 to 1523 m > Per $ GDP: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per $ GDP figures expressed per 1 trillion $ gross domestic product.
  • With unpaved runways > Under 914 m > Per capita: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
  • With unpaved runways > Under 914 m: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway
  • With unpaved runways > Total > Per $ GDP: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces) Per $ GDP figures expressed per 1 trillion $ gross domestic product.
  • With unpaved runways > 914 to 1523 m per million: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
  • With unpaved runways > 914 to 1523 m: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway
  • With unpaved runways > 914 to 1,523 m per million people: This entry is derived from Transport > Airports > With unpaved runways, which gives the total number of airports with unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces) by length. For airports with more than one runway, only the longest runway is included according to the following five groups - (1) over 3,047 m (over 10,000 ft), (2) 2,438 to 3,047 m (8,000 to 10,000 ft), (3) 1,524 to 2,437 m (5,000 to 8,000 ft), (4) 914 to 1,523 m (3,000 to 5,000 ft), and (5) under 914 m (under 3,000 ft). Only airports with usable runways are included in this listing. Not all airports have facilities for refueling, maintenance, or air traffic control. The type aircraft capable of operating from a runway of a given length is dependent upon a number of factors including elevation of the runway, runway gradient, average maximum daily temperature at the airport, engine types, flap settings, and take-off weight of the aircraft. Figures expressed per million people for the same year.
  • With paved runways > 2,438 to 3,047 m per million people: This entry is derived from Transport > Airports > With paved runways, which gives the total number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces) by length. For airports with more than one runway, only the longest runway is included according to the following five groups - (1) over 3,047 m (over 10,000 ft), (2) 2,438 to 3,047 m (8,000 to 10,000 ft), (3) 1,524 to 2,437 m (5,000 to 8,000 ft), (4) 914 to 1,523 m (3,000 to 5,000 ft), and (5) under 914 m (under 3,000 ft). Only airports with usable runways are included in this listing. Not all airports have facilities for refueling, maintenance, or air traffic control. The type aircraft capable of operating from a runway of a given length is dependent upon a number of factors including elevation of the runway, runway gradient, average maximum daily temperature at the airport, engine types, flap settings, and take-off weight of the aircraft. Figures expressed per million people for the same year.
  • With paved runways > 914 to 1523 m: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway
  • With paved runways > 2438 to 3047 m: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway
  • With paved runways > 2,438 to 3,047 m: This entry is derived from Transport > Airports > With paved runways, which gives the total number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces) by length. For airports with more than one runway, only the longest runway is included according to the following five groups - (1) over 3,047 m (over 10,000 ft), (2) 2,438 to 3,047 m (8,000 to 10,000 ft), (3) 1,524 to 2,437 m (5,000 to 8,000 ft), (4) 914 to 1,523 m (3,000 to 5,000 ft), and (5) under 914 m (under 3,000 ft). Only airports with usable runways are included in this listing. Not all airports have facilities for refueling, maintenance, or air traffic control. The type aircraft capable of operating from a runway of a given length is dependent upon a number of factors including elevation of the runway, runway gradient, average maximum daily temperature at the airport, engine types, flap settings, and take-off weight of the aircraft.
  • With unpaved runways > Under 914 m per million: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
  • With paved runways > 914 to 1523 m > Per $ GDP: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per $ GDP figures expressed per 1 trillion $ gross domestic product.
  • With paved runways > 1,524 to 2,437 m per million people: This entry is derived from Transport > Airports > With paved runways, which gives the total number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces) by length. For airports with more than one runway, only the longest runway is included according to the following five groups - (1) over 3,047 m (over 10,000 ft), (2) 2,438 to 3,047 m (8,000 to 10,000 ft), (3) 1,524 to 2,437 m (5,000 to 8,000 ft), (4) 914 to 1,523 m (3,000 to 5,000 ft), and (5) under 914 m (under 3,000 ft). Only airports with usable runways are included in this listing. Not all airports have facilities for refueling, maintenance, or air traffic control. The type aircraft capable of operating from a runway of a given length is dependent upon a number of factors including elevation of the runway, runway gradient, average maximum daily temperature at the airport, engine types, flap settings, and take-off weight of the aircraft. Figures expressed per million people for the same year.
  • With paved runways > 914 to 1523 m > Per capita: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
  • With paved runways > 1524 to 2437 m > Per capita: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
  • With paved runways > 1524 to 2437 m > Per $ GDP: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway Per $ GDP figures expressed per 1 trillion $ gross domestic product.
  • With paved runways > 1524 to 2437 m per million: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
  • With paved runways > 2438 to 3047 m per million: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
  • With paved runways > 914 to 1523 m per million: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
  • With paved runways > Under 914 m per million: Number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces), categorised according to the length of the longest runway. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
  • With unpaved runways > Total per million: Total number of airports with useable unpaved runways (grass, dirt, sand, or gravel surfaces). Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
  • With paved runways > Total per million: Total number of airports with paved runways (concrete or asphalt surfaces). Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
STAT Australia Costa Rica HISTORY
Per $ GDP 0.592 per $1 billion of GDP
Ranked 136th.
7.09 per $1 billion of GDP
Ranked 50th. 12 times more than Australia

Per capita 22.56 per 1 million people
Ranked 69th.
33.09 per 1 million people
Ranked 28th. 47% more than Australia

With paved runways > 1,524 to 2,437 m 155
Ranked 3rd. 78 times more than Costa Rica
2
Ranked 133th.

With paved runways > 1524 to 2437 m 131
Ranked 3rd. 66 times more than Costa Rica
2
Ranked 98th.
With paved runways > 2438 to 3047 m > Per $ GDP 15.62 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 121st.
90.31 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 82nd. 6 times more than Australia

With paved runways > 2438 to 3047 m > Per capita 0.587 per 1 million people
Ranked 71st. 34% more than Costa Rica
0.438 per 1 million people
Ranked 52nd.

With paved runways > 914 to 1,523 m 155
Ranked 4th. 6 times more than Costa Rica
27
Ranked 22nd.

With paved runways > 914 to 1,523 m per million people 6.96
Ranked 22nd. 21% more than Costa Rica
5.75
Ranked 25th.

With paved runways > Total 349
Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Costa Rica
47
Ranked 44th.

With paved runways > Total > Per $ GDP 0.405 per $1 billion of GDP
Ranked 119th.
1.45 per $1 billion of GDP
Ranked 57th. 4 times more than Australia

With paved runways > Total > Per capita 15.51 per 1 million people
Ranked 46th. 82% more than Costa Rica
8.55 per 1 million people
Ranked 35th.

With paved runways > Under 914 m 14
Ranked 28th.
16
Ranked 26th. 14% more than Australia

With unpaved runways > 914 to 1,523 m 101
Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Costa Rica
18
Ranked 50th.

With unpaved runways > Total 131
Ranked 30th. 15% more than Costa Rica
114
Ranked 33th.

With unpaved runways > Under 914 m > Per $ GDP 19.53 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 146th.
4,560.83 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 30th. 234 times more than Australia

With unpaved runways > Total > Per capita 7.05 per 1 million people
Ranked 76th.
24.54 per 1 million people
Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Australia

With paved runways > Under 914 m > Per $ GDP 16.92 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 96th.
406.41 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 22nd. 24 times more than Australia

With paved runways > Under 914 m > Per capita 0.636 per 1 million people
Ranked 55th.
2.63 per 1 million people
Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Australia

With unpaved runways > 914 to 1523 m > Per capita 5.33 per 1 million people
Ranked 44th. 35% more than Costa Rica
3.94 per 1 million people
Ranked 32nd.

With unpaved runways > 914 to 1523 m > Per $ GDP 144.5 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 105th.
1,083.76 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 57th. 8 times more than Australia

With unpaved runways > Under 914 m > Per capita 0.783 per 1 million people
Ranked 126th.
20.6 per 1 million people
Ranked 14th. 26 times more than Australia

With unpaved runways > Under 914 m 14
Ranked 88th.
96
Ranked 22nd. 7 times more than Australia

With unpaved runways > Total > Per $ GDP 187.46 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 129th.
5,644.6 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 48th. 30 times more than Australia

With unpaved runways > 914 to 1523 m per million 5.49
Ranked 30th.
5.56
Ranked 29th. 1% more than Australia
With unpaved runways > 914 to 1523 m 112
Ranked 9th. 5 times more than Costa Rica
24
Ranked 38th.
With unpaved runways > 914 to 1,523 m per million people 4.54
Ranked 37th. 18% more than Costa Rica
3.83
Ranked 40th.

With paved runways > 2,438 to 3,047 m per million people 0.573
Ranked 74th. 38% more than Costa Rica
0.416
Ranked 94th.

With paved runways > 914 to 1523 m 139
Ranked 3rd. 8 times more than Costa Rica
18
Ranked 23th.
With paved runways > 2438 to 3047 m 12
Ranked 28th. 6 times more than Costa Rica
2
Ranked 88th.
With paved runways > 2,438 to 3,047 m 13
Ranked 34th. 7 times more than Costa Rica
2
Ranked 121st.

With unpaved runways > Under 914 m per million 0.544
Ranked 130th.
20.13
Ranked 18th. 37 times more than Australia

With paved runways > 914 to 1523 m > Per $ GDP 186.16 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 54th.
857.98 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Australia

With paved runways > 1,524 to 2,437 m per million people 6.96
Ranked 30th. 16 times more than Costa Rica
0.426
Ranked 114th.

With paved runways > 914 to 1523 m > Per capita 7 per 1 million people
Ranked 21st. 39% more than Costa Rica
5.04 per 1 million people
Ranked 13th.

With paved runways > 1524 to 2437 m > Per capita 6.75 per 1 million people
Ranked 28th. 15 times more than Costa Rica
0.438 per 1 million people
Ranked 61st.

With paved runways > 1524 to 2437 m > Per $ GDP 173.14 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 78th. 92% more than Costa Rica
90.31 per $1 trillion of GDP
Ranked 105th.

With paved runways > 1524 to 2437 m per million 6.42
Ranked 14th. 14 times more than Costa Rica
0.463
Ranked 74th.
With paved runways > 2438 to 3047 m per million 0.588
Ranked 55th. 27% more than Costa Rica
0.463
Ranked 67th.
With paved runways > 914 to 1523 m per million 6.82
Ranked 13th. 64% more than Costa Rica
4.17
Ranked 20th.
With paved runways > Under 914 m per million 0.634
Ranked 49th.
2.57
Ranked 25th. 4 times more than Australia

With unpaved runways > Total per million 6.3
Ranked 68th.
23.98
Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Australia

With paved runways > Total per million 14.77
Ranked 27th. 77% more than Costa Rica
8.35
Ranked 48th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×