×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Australia & Cuba

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Australia Cuba HISTORY
Consumption 27.56 billion cu m
Ranked 19th. 27 times more than Cuba
1.03 billion cu m
Ranked 11th.

Consumption > Per capita 1.44 million cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 19th. 41 times more than Cuba
35,014.15 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 42nd.

Consumption per capita 1,220.91 cu m
Ranked 14th. 34 times more than Cuba
35.41 cu m
Ranked 41st.

Imports 10.92 billion cu m
Ranked 22nd.
0.0
Ranked 50th.

Imports per capita 301.21 cu m
Ranked 30th.
0.0
Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 11.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Cuba
2.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 47th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 11.26 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Cuba
2.53 Terajoules
Ranked 47th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 52.58 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 21 times more than Cuba
2.54 Terajoules
Ranked 86th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 24.02 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 9 times more than Cuba
2.54 Terajoules
Ranked 63th.

Including LNG > Total resources per capita 1.44 Terajoules
Ranked 27th. 6 times more than Cuba
0.245 Terajoules
Ranked 47th.

Production None None
Proved > Reserves per capita 141,171.89 cu m
Ranked 15th. 22 times more than Cuba
6,274.73 cu m
Ranked 45th.

Proved reserves 1.22 trillion cu m
Ranked 23th. 17 times more than Cuba
70.79 billion cu m
Ranked 55th.

Reserves 2.41 trillion cubic feet
Ranked 9th. 56 times more than Cuba
42.62 billion cubic feet
Ranked 50th.
Reserves per capita 118,020.28 cubic feet
Ranked 11th. 31 times more than Cuba
3,774.33 cubic feet
Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 365,811 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 7952 times more than Cuba
46 Terajoules
Ranked 94th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 52.58 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 21 times more than Cuba
2.54 Terajoules
Ranked 86th.

Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000 81.21 Terajoules
Ranked 23th. 32 times more than Cuba
2.54 Terajoules
Ranked 61st.

Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000 80.83 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 32 times more than Cuba
2.54 Terajoules
Ranked 58th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 8.91 Terajoules
Ranked 23th. 1130 times more than Cuba
0.00788 Terajoules
Ranked 71st.

Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2004
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 14.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Cuba
2.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 51st.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 181,681 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 2041 times more than Cuba
89 Terajoules
Ranked 74th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 8.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 23th. 1117 times more than Cuba
0.008 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 73th.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 291,670 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 10 times more than Cuba
28,548 Terajoules
Ranked 57th.

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita 4.87 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 34th. 5 times more than Cuba
0.887 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 35th.

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture 99 Terajoules
Ranked 35th. 10 times more than Cuba
10 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 24th. 4499 times more than Cuba
0.004 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 93th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 1.07 million Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 37 times more than Cuba
28,637 Terajoules
Ranked 87th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 1.07 million Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 37 times more than Cuba
28,637 Terajoules
Ranked 87th.

Including LNG > Gross > Production 1.66 million Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 58 times more than Cuba
28,637 Terajoules
Ranked 64th.

Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita 1,449.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th. 6 times more than Cuba
245.84 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 50th.

Including LNG > Total resources 29.46 million Terajoules
Ranked 28th. 11 times more than Cuba
2.77 million Terajoules
Ranked 60th.

Proved > Reserves 3.12 trillion cu m
Ranked 12th. 44 times more than Cuba
70.79 billion cu m
Ranked 55th.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 14.3 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Cuba
2.53 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 45,376 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 574 times more than Cuba
79 Terajoules
Ranked 65th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 2.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 319 times more than Cuba
0.007 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 64th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 229,668 Terajoules
Ranked 13th. 8 times more than Cuba
28,548 Terajoules
Ranked 51st.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 52.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 25th. 21 times more than Cuba
2.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 87th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 385,013 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 8370 times more than Cuba
46 Terajoules
Ranked 96th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 18.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 25th. 4735 times more than Cuba
0.004 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 95th.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 52.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 25th. 21 times more than Cuba
2.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 87th.

Including LNG > Net > Production 1.65 million Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 58 times more than Cuba
28,637 Terajoules
Ranked 62nd.

Including LNG > Net inland availability 489,792 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 17 times more than Cuba
28,637 Terajoules
Ranked 67th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 24.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 25th. 9 times more than Cuba
2.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 64th.

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita -55,215,048,082.003 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 40th. 16 times more than Cuba
-3,386,857,566.595 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 33th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 18.88 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 4626 times more than Cuba
0.00408 Terajoules
Ranked 94th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 2.22 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 318 times more than Cuba
0.007 Terajoules
Ranked 62nd.

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million 4.85 Terajoules
Ranked 34th. 5 times more than Cuba
0.886 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 17.94 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 4396 times more than Cuba
0.00408 Terajoules
Ranked 92nd.

Proved reserves per capita 54,755.75 cu m
Ranked 23th. 9 times more than Cuba
6,399.45 cu m
Ranked 46th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×