Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Australia & Georgia

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Australia	Georgia
Consumption	27.56 billion cu m Ranked 19th. 14 times more than Georgia	1.97 billion cu m Ranked 10th.
Consumption > Per capita	1.44 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Georgia	373,582.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Consumption per capita	1,220.91 cu m Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Georgia	394.63 cu m Ranked 21st.
Imports	10.92 billion cu m Ranked 22nd. 6 times more than Georgia	1.96 billion cu m Ranked 31st.
Imports per capita	301.21 cu m Ranked 30th.	392.35 cu m Ranked 6th. 30% more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	19,806 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 5 times more than Georgia	3,618 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	136,206 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 17 times more than Georgia	8,198 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	11.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 12 times more than Georgia	0.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	11.26 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 12 times more than Georgia	0.964 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	52.58 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Georgia	11.48 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	24.02 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 7 times more than Georgia	3.56 Terajoules Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	1.44 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 20 times more than Georgia	0.0716 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	141,171.89 cu m Ranked 15th. 74 times more than Georgia	1,907.79 cu m Ranked 66th.
Proved reserves	1.22 trillion cu m Ranked 23th. 143 times more than Georgia	8.49 billion cu m Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	365,811 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 39 times more than Georgia	9,435 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.971 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 16% more than Georgia	0.836 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	806.14 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 5 times more than Georgia	153.16 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	3.02 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Georgia	1.16 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	52.58 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Georgia	11.48 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	81.21 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 618 times more than Georgia	0.131 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	80.83 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 683 times more than Georgia	0.118 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.91 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 4 times more than Georgia	2.42 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2005 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.974 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 23% more than Georgia	0.793 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	2.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 83 times more than Georgia	0.025 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	45,376 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 19 times more than Georgia	2,338 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	2.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Georgia	0.523 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	808.75 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 14th. 5 times more than Georgia	149.29 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	16,441 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 25 times more than Georgia	668 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	229,668 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 55 times more than Georgia	4,206 Terajoules Ranked 75th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	61,613 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 12 times more than Georgia	5,047 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	3.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Georgia	1.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	808.75 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 14th. 5 times more than Georgia	149.29 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	16,441 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 25 times more than Georgia	668 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	4.87 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 34th.	1,495.09 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 307 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	52.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Georgia	11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	385,013 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 41 times more than Georgia	9,435 Terajoules Ranked 85th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 9 times more than Georgia	2.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 73th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	0.384 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 30 times more than Georgia	0.013 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	52.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Georgia	11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	1.07 million Terajoules Ranked 25th. 21 times more than Georgia	50,048 Terajoules Ranked 80th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	1.66 million Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 2890 times more than Georgia	573 Terajoules Ranked 86th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	1,449.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 21 times more than Georgia	69.77 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Total resources	29.46 million Terajoules Ranked 28th. 94 times more than Georgia	312,168 Terajoules Ranked 84th.
Proved > Reserves	3.12 trillion cu m Ranked 12th. 367 times more than Georgia	8.49 billion cu m Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-55,215,048,082.003 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 40th.	-792,610,886,109.614 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 48th. 14 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	42,196 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 380 times more than Georgia	111 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	2.22 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Georgia	0.536 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	806.14 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 5 times more than Georgia	153.16 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	4.85 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	1,592.31 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 328 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.94 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 8 times more than Georgia	2.16 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Proved reserves per capita	54,755.75 cu m Ranked 23th. 29 times more than Georgia	1,864.61 cu m Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	6.68 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Georgia	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	6.66 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 7 times more than Georgia	1.02 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	14.3 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 14 times more than Georgia	0.99 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	2.07 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 81 times more than Georgia	0.0255 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	6.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 7 times more than Georgia	0.996 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	135,921 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 30 times more than Georgia	4,458 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	14.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 15 times more than Georgia	0.965 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	181,681 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 17 times more than Georgia	10,536 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 4 times more than Georgia	2.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	291,670 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 68 times more than Georgia	4,317 Terajoules Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	99 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	7,820 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 79 times more than Australia
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 9 times more than Georgia	2.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 70th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented	7,800 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 137 times more than Georgia	57 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	1.07 million Terajoules Ranked 25th. 21 times more than Georgia	50,048 Terajoules Ranked 80th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	1.65 million Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3195 times more than Georgia	516 Terajoules Ranked 86th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	489,792 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 32 times more than Georgia	15,521 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	24.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 7 times more than Georgia	3.47 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.88 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 9 times more than Georgia	2.16 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	6.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 4 times more than Georgia	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	0.382 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 29 times more than Georgia	0.0131 Terajoules Ranked 39th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Australia and Georgia in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Australia & Georgia

Definitions

Citation

Compare Australia and Georgia in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Australia and Georgia in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation