Energy > Natural gas > Including LNG Stats: compare key data on Australia & Latvia

SHARE TWEET EMBED

Select year 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

•  

STAT	Australia	Latvia	HISTORY
Consumption by chemical industry	19,806 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 41 times more than Latvia	485 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.971 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption by energy sector per 1000	6.66 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 16 times more than Latvia	0.421 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Consumption by households	136,206 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 29 times more than Latvia	4,659 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	8.91 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 2 times more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Consumption by households per 1000	6.68 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Latvia	2.03 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	14.3 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	2.07 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 4% more than Latvia	1.99 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	11.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 37th.
Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	11.26 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Latvia	3.76 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Consumption by transportation industry per million	806.14 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 25 times more than Latvia	32.6 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Conversion in thermal power plants	365,811 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 15 times more than Latvia	25,156 Terajoules Ranked 74th.
Energy balance requirement per 1000	52.58 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 91% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Gross inland availability per 1000	52.58 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 91% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Net inland availability per 1000	24.02 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 2 times more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Consumption by households > Per capita	6.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Latvia	2.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.974 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 5 times more than Latvia	0.211 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.
Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	6.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 16 times more than Latvia	0.421 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st.
Consumption by energy sector	135,921 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 140 times more than Latvia	969 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	14.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Latvia	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Consumption by households and other consumers	181,681 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 18 times more than Latvia	9,839 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	8.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 2 times more than Latvia	4.28 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Consumption by industry and construction	291,670 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 21 times more than Latvia	13,714 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	808.75 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 14th. 25 times more than Latvia	32.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 38th.
Consumption by transportation industry	16,441 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 219 times more than Latvia	75 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	4.87 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 34th.	356.44 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 8th. 73 times more than Australia
Conversion in other energy-producing plants	5,580 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	13,230 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 2 times more than Australia
Consumption in agriculture	99 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	820 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 8 times more than Australia
Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.295 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.	5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 5th. 19 times more than Australia
Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 65% more than Latvia	10.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st.
Energy balance requirement > Per capita	52.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 92% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Conversion to other forms of energy	385,013 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 10 times more than Latvia	38,386 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	18.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 14% more than Latvia	16.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.
Gross inland availability > Per capita	52.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 92% more than Latvia	27.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Energy balance requirement	1.07 million Terajoules Ranked 25th. 17 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Gross inland availability	1.07 million Terajoules Ranked 25th. 17 times more than Latvia	63,169 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Statistical differences > Per capita	-55,215,048,082.003 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 40th.	214.92 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.
Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.295 Terajoules Ranked 25th.	5.75 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 20 times more than Australia
Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	2.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 4% more than Latvia	1.99 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th.
Consumption by other consumers	45,376 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 10 times more than Latvia	4,360 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	2.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 18% more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	808.75 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 14th. 25 times more than Latvia	32.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 32nd.
Consumption by other transportation	16,441 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 219 times more than Latvia	75 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Consumption by other industries and construction	229,668 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 27 times more than Latvia	8,646 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Net inland availability	489,792 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 21 times more than Latvia	23,628 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Net inland availability > Per capita	24.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 2 times more than Latvia	10.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Consumption by iron and steel industry	42,196 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 9 times more than Latvia	4,583 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	18.88 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 13% more than Latvia	16.69 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Consumption by other consumers per 1000	2.22 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 17% more than Latvia	1.9 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Consumption by other transportation per million	806.14 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 25 times more than Latvia	32.6 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Consumption in agriculture per million	4.85 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	356.44 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 73 times more than Australia
Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	17.94 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 64% more than Latvia	10.93 Terajoules Ranked 41st.

15 30 60 All

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation