Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Austria & Denmark

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Austria	Denmark
Consumption	9.27 billion cu m Ranked 30th. 2 times more than Denmark	4.18 billion cu m Ranked 39th.
Consumption > Per capita	1.03 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 31st. 24% more than Denmark	833,010.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 39th.
Consumption per capita	971.87 cu m Ranked 22nd. 22% more than Denmark	798.47 cu m Ranked 27th.
Imports	42.56 billion cu m Ranked 10th. 168 times more than Denmark	254 million cu m Ranked 37th.
Imports per capita	1,130.87 cu m Ranked 9th.	0.0 Ranked 98th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	26,702 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 7 times more than Denmark	3,980 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	67,028 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 2 times more than Denmark	32,277 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	46.33 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 23% more than Denmark	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	27.21 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 88% more than Denmark	14.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0711 Terajoules Ranked 69th.	0.59 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 8 times more than Austria
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	2,955.98 cu m Ranked 58th.	11,049.66 cu m Ranked 38th. 4 times more than Austria
Proved reserves	10.82 billion cu m Ranked 76th.	42.98 billion cu m Ranked 63th. 4 times more than Austria
Reserves	24.9 billion cubic feet Ranked 54th.	81.98 billion cubic feet Ranked 38th. 3 times more than Austria
Reserves per capita	3,026.31 cubic feet Ranked 46th.	15,127.05 cubic feet Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Austria
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.35 Ranked 41st. 75% more than Denmark	0.2 Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	8.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 70% more than Denmark	5.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	119,356 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 28% more than Denmark	93,184 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.25 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Denmark	0.734 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	663.01 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 27 times more than Denmark	24.36 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	46.33 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 23% more than Denmark	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	7.93 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	82.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 10 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	7.55 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	80.55 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 11 times more than Austria
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	1.04 Ranked 21st. 15% more than Denmark	0.907 Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	11.87 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 42% more than Denmark	8.34 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	8.5 Ranked 41st. 73% more than Denmark	4.9 Ranked 48th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2004	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	998.9 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 3rd. 4% more than Denmark	957.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	7,920 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 59% more than Denmark	4,969 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 4 times more than Denmark	0.735 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	4,004 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 8 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 13 times more than Denmark	0.143 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	29,899 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Denmark	10,446 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	3.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 88% more than Denmark	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	73,636 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Denmark	28,556 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	10,183 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 2 times more than Denmark	4,855 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	757 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	2,498 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 38% more than Denmark	0.896 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.	17.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 19% more than Austria
Including LNG > Exports	38,916 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	233,085 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 6 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	46.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 23% more than Denmark	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	129,539 Terajoules Ranked 45th. 31% more than Denmark	98,659 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	15.73 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.	18.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 16% more than Austria
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	46.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 23% more than Denmark	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	381,217 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 86% more than Denmark	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita	0.389 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.	5.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 13 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	5,299 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 40 times more than Denmark	132 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Exports > Per capita	4.73 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.	43.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 9 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage	3,200 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	27,092 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 8 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	71.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.	590.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 8 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Total resources	585,315 Terajoules Ranked 76th.	3.2 million Terajoules Ranked 57th. 5 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	784.98 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 9th.	-654,175,478,556.227 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	3.63 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 89% more than Denmark	1.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	92 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	460.93 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	14.51 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	17.19 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 19% more than Austria
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	1,001.82 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 5% more than Denmark	957.67 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000	0.389 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	5.06 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 13 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	2,418.38 Terajoules Ranked 1st.	-226.223 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	8.15 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 37% more than Denmark	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	1.94 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	14.02 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Denmark	6.15 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	1.83 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 13 times more than Denmark	0.143 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.487 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 12 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	8.95 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 70% more than Denmark	5.27 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Exports per 1000	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	43.01 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 9 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	19,898 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.	-1,226 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.	5.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	15,923 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 94% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	14.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Denmark	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	97,684 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 2 times more than Denmark	45,221 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	11.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 42% more than Denmark	8.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	115,386 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 3 times more than Denmark	33,309 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	91.94 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 26th.	461.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th. 5 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	381,217 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 86% more than Denmark	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	65,281 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	444,626 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 7 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Net > Production	62,081 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	436,520 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 7 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Net inland availability	223,881 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Denmark	78,530 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	27.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 88% more than Denmark	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Proved > Reserves	24.8 billion cu m Ranked 72nd.	61.3 billion cu m Ranked 60th. 2 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	15,048 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 19 times more than Denmark	773 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	1.16 Ranked 21st. 16% more than Denmark	0.999 Ranked 28th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	9.5 Ranked 41st. 76% more than Denmark	5.4 Ranked 48th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	0.9 Ranked 41st. 80% more than Denmark	0.5 Ranked 48th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.35 Ranked 41st. 75% more than Denmark	0.2 Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	15.74 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	18.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 16% more than Austria
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.24 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 38% more than Denmark	0.896 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Proved reserves per capita	1,316.04 cu m Ranked 68th.	7,735.15 cu m Ranked 41st. 6 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	8.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 37% more than Denmark	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Austria and Denmark in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Austria & Denmark

Definitions

Citation

Compare Austria and Denmark in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Austria and Denmark in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation