Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Austria & Romania

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Austria	Romania
Consumption	9.27 billion cu m Ranked 30th.	14.2 billion cu m Ranked 25th. 53% more than Austria
Consumption > Per capita	1.03 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 31st. 35% more than Romania	760,556.7 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 16th.
Consumption per capita	971.87 cu m Ranked 22nd. 24% more than Romania	786.48 cu m Ranked 15th.
Imports	42.56 billion cu m Ranked 10th. 13 times more than Romania	3.16 billion cu m Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	26,702 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	71,601 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 3 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by households	67,028 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	107,027 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 60% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 31% more than Romania	1.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	29,899 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	36,362 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 22% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	3.63 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Romania	1.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	10,811 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 7 times more than Romania	1,548 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	1,313.08 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 11th. 18 times more than Romania	71.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 27th.
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	10.82 billion cu m Ranked 76th.	105.5 billion cu m Ranked 49th. 10 times more than Austria
Reserves	24.9 billion cubic feet Ranked 54th.	111.1 billion cubic feet Ranked 34th. 4 times more than Austria
Reserves per capita	3,026.31 cubic feet Ranked 46th.	5,135.35 cubic feet Ranked 34th. 70% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	1.45 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 2 times more than Romania	0.645 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	11,919 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	13,944 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 17% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	73,636 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	85,950 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 17% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	11,874 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	49,910 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 4 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	45.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Romania	9.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	62,081 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	451,305 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 7 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Net inland availability	223,881 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	334,311 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 49% more than Austria
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	27.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 76% more than Romania	15.45 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	784.98 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 9th. 5 times more than Romania	156.65 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	15,048 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	30,136 Terajoules Ranked 17th. Twice as much as Austria
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	0.9 Ranked 41st.	1.8 Ranked 30th. Twice as much as Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	3.63 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Romania	1.68 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	1,313.96 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 18 times more than Romania	71.55 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	92 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 18% more than Romania	77.98 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	14.51 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 2 times more than Romania	7.07 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Proved reserves per capita	1,316.04 cu m Ranked 68th.	4,841.56 cu m Ranked 53th. 4 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	45.94 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Romania	9.01 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	19,898 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.	-2,346 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	4,004 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	31,114 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 8 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	1.83 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 31% more than Romania	1.39 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.487 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	1.44 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	8.95 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Romania	3.97 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	46.33 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 55% more than Romania	29.98 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	27.21 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 76% more than Romania	15.45 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Proved > Reserves per capita	2,955.98 cu m Ranked 58th. 1% more than Romania	2,938.71 cu m Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0711 Terajoules Ranked 69th.	0.218 Terajoules Ranked 52nd. 3 times more than Austria
Imports per capita	1,130.87 cu m Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Romania	255.65 cu m Ranked 7th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.35 Ranked 41st.	0.7 Ranked 30th. Twice as much as Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	8.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 2 times more than Romania	3.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	119,356 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	152,891 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 28% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	3.25 Terajoules Ranked 11th.	3.31 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 2% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	1.45 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 2 times more than Romania	0.645 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	1,313.96 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 18 times more than Romania	71.55 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	1.44 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	2.31 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 60% more than Austria
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	663.01 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	1,223.89 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 85% more than Austria
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	46.33 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 55% more than Romania	29.98 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	7.93 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	20.86 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	7.55 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	20.86 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Austria
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	1.04 Ranked 21st. 33% more than Romania	0.779 Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	11.87 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 77% more than Romania	6.71 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	8.5 Ranked 41st.	16.9 Ranked 31st. 99% more than Austria
Consumption > Date of > Information	2004	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	8.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th. 65% more than Romania	4.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	3.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th.	3.31 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 2% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.	2.23 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st. 15% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	15,923 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	48,273 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	14.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 62% more than Romania	8.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	97,684 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	145,076 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 49% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	11.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 77% more than Romania	6.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	115,386 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	187,687 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 63% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	1.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.	2.31 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 60% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	1,313.08 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 11th. 18 times more than Romania	71.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	10,811 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 7 times more than Romania	1,548 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	91.94 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 26th. 18% more than Romania	77.98 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	10,183 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	33,334 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	757 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	1,687 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	1.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th.	1.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 25% more than Austria
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 2 times more than Romania	7.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	46.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 54% more than Romania	29.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	129,539 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	186,225 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 44% more than Austria
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	15.73 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 83% more than Romania	8.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	46.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 54% more than Romania	29.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	381,217 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	648,586 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 70% more than Austria
Including LNG > Imports	377,950 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 94% more than Romania	194,935 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	5,299 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	26,478 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 5 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	381,217 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	648,586 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 70% more than Austria
Including LNG > Gross > Production	65,281 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	451,305 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 7 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	71.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.	218.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th. 3 times more than Austria
Including LNG > Total resources	585,315 Terajoules Ranked 76th.	4.72 million Terajoules Ranked 49th. 8 times more than Austria
Proved > Reserves	24.8 billion cu m Ranked 72nd.	63 billion cu m Ranked 58th. 3 times more than Austria
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	1.16 Ranked 21st. 34% more than Romania	0.867 Ranked 32nd.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	9.5 Ranked 41st.	18.8 Ranked 31st. 98% more than Austria
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.35 Ranked 41st.	0.7 Ranked 30th. Twice as much as Austria
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	15.74 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 83% more than Romania	8.61 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	1.24 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	1.54 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 24% more than Austria
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	2,418.38 Terajoules Ranked 1st.	-108.439 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	8.15 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 65% more than Romania	4.95 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	1.94 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	2.23 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 15% more than Austria
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	14.02 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 62% more than Romania	8.68 Terajoules Ranked 27th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Austria and Romania in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Conflict	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Travel
Energy	Lifestyle	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Austria & Romania

Definitions

Citation

Compare Austria and Romania in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Austria and Romania in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation