Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Azerbaijan & Georgia

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Azerbaijan	Georgia
Consumption	9.92 billion cu m Ranked 31st. 5 times more than Georgia	1.97 billion cu m Ranked 10th.
Consumption > Per capita	1.24 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Georgia	373,582.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 21st.
Consumption per capita	1,154.8 cu m Ranked 11th. 3 times more than Georgia	394.63 cu m Ranked 21st.
Imports	250 million cu m Ranked 62nd.	1.96 billion cu m Ranked 31st. 8 times more than Azerbaijan
Imports per capita	0.0 Ranked 67th.	392.35 cu m Ranked 6th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	7,314 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Georgia	3,618 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	108,086 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 13 times more than Georgia	8,198 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.926 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.	0.94 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th. 2% more than Azerbaijan
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	167,757 Terajoules Ranked 37th. 18 times more than Georgia	9,435 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	45.05 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Georgia	11.48 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	15.6 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Georgia	3.56 Terajoules Ranked 57th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	6.28 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 88 times more than Georgia	0.0716 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	93,822.49 cu m Ranked 18th. 49 times more than Georgia	1,907.79 cu m Ranked 66th.
Proved reserves	991.1 billion cu m Ranked 25th. 117 times more than Georgia	8.49 billion cu m Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.872 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 4% more than Georgia	0.836 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	646.94 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Georgia	153.16 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	2.22 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 92% more than Georgia	1.16 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	2,268.75 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.	3,573.85 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 58% more than Azerbaijan
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	45.05 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Georgia	11.48 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	28.1 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 214 times more than Georgia	0.131 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	25.24 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 213 times more than Georgia	0.118 Terajoules Ranked 81st.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	13.12 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 5 times more than Georgia	2.42 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2005 est.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	2.86 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 219 times more than Georgia	0.0131 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	21.77 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 92% more than Georgia	11.36 Terajoules Ranked 31st.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.872 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 10% more than Georgia	0.793 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.031 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th. 24% more than Georgia	0.025 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	830 Terajoules Ranked 60th.	2,338 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 3 times more than Azerbaijan
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.099 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th.	0.523 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th. 5 times more than Azerbaijan
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	647.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Georgia	149.29 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	5,429 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 8 times more than Georgia	668 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	7,767 Terajoules Ranked 70th. 85% more than Georgia	4,206 Terajoules Ranked 75th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	18,624 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 4 times more than Georgia	5,047 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	2.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 97% more than Georgia	1.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	647.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Georgia	149.29 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	5,429 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 8 times more than Georgia	668 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	143.78 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 18th.	1,495.09 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 10 times more than Azerbaijan
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	45.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Georgia	11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	167,757 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 18 times more than Georgia	9,435 Terajoules Ranked 85th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	20 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 9 times more than Georgia	2.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 73th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	2.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 220 times more than Georgia	0.013 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	45.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Georgia	11.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	378,012 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 8 times more than Georgia	50,048 Terajoules Ranked 80th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	235,822 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 412 times more than Georgia	573 Terajoules Ranked 86th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	21.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 97% more than Georgia	11.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	211,786 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 410 times more than Georgia	516 Terajoules Ranked 86th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	130,896 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 8 times more than Georgia	15,521 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	15.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Georgia	3.47 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	4.54 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 21st.	-792,610,886,109.614 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 48th.
Proved reserves per capita	103,345.52 cu m Ranked 16th. 55 times more than Georgia	1,864.61 cu m Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	1,966.79 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 30 times more than Georgia	64.75 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	12.88 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 7 times more than Georgia	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	4.97 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 5 times more than Georgia	1.02 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.83 Terajoules Ranked 60th. 85% more than Georgia	0.99 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.0315 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 24% more than Georgia	0.0255 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.926 Terajoules Ranked 65th.	0.964 Terajoules Ranked 62nd. 4% more than Azerbaijan
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	16,505 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 58 times more than Georgia	284 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	4.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 5 times more than Georgia	0.996 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	41,696 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 9 times more than Georgia	4,458 Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 58th. 90% more than Georgia	0.965 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	110,122 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 10 times more than Georgia	10,536 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	13.13 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 6 times more than Georgia	2.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	15,345 Terajoules Ranked 69th. 4 times more than Georgia	4,317 Terajoules Ranked 79th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	1,206 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	7,820 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Azerbaijan
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	20 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 9 times more than Georgia	2.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 70th.
Including LNG > Flared and vented	24,036 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 422 times more than Georgia	57 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	378,012 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 8 times more than Georgia	50,048 Terajoules Ranked 80th.
Including LNG > Imports	182,731 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 4 times more than Georgia	49,532 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	19,039 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 22% more than Georgia	15,587 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	6,280.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 90 times more than Georgia	69.77 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Total resources	52.68 million Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 169 times more than Georgia	312,168 Terajoules Ranked 84th.
Proved > Reserves	849.5 billion cu m Ranked 27th. 100 times more than Georgia	8.49 billion cu m Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	264 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 2 times more than Georgia	111 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	19.99 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 9 times more than Georgia	2.16 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.0989 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	0.536 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 5 times more than Azerbaijan
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	646.94 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 4 times more than Georgia	153.16 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	143.71 Terajoules Ranked 18th.	1,592.31 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 11 times more than Azerbaijan
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	19.99 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 9 times more than Georgia	2.16 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	12.89 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 13th. 7 times more than Georgia	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Azerbaijan and Georgia in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Conflict	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Travel
Energy	Lifestyle	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Azerbaijan & Georgia

Definitions

Citation

Compare Azerbaijan and Georgia in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Azerbaijan and Georgia in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation