Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Belarus & Malaysia

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Belarus	Malaysia
Consumption	21.82 billion cu m Ranked 23th.	32.62 billion cu m Ranked 18th. 49% more than Belarus
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.69 Ranked 32nd.	1.23 Ranked 19th. 78% more than Belarus
Consumption > Per capita	2.24 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 2 times more than Malaysia	1.04 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 12th.
Consumption per capita	1,788.16 cu m Ranked 9th. 86% more than Malaysia	962.19 cu m Ranked 13th.
Imports	21.02 billion cu m Ranked 15th. 11 times more than Malaysia	1.99 billion cu m Ranked 47th.
Imports per capita	1,851.27 cu m Ranked 2nd.	0.0 Ranked 109th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	18,152 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	62,290 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	2.41 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 28% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by households	54,187 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 259 times more than Malaysia	209 Terajoules Ranked 62nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.	6.32 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 24% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	428,318 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	513,419 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 20% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0121 Terajoules Ranked 85th.	3.74 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 309 times more than Belarus
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	298.42 cu m Ranked 81st.	83,109.84 cu m Ranked 20th. 279 times more than Belarus
Proved reserves	2.83 billion cu m Ranked 92nd.	2.35 trillion cu m Ranked 14th. 830 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	1,031.15 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 7 times more than Malaysia	152.77 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	5.31 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 2 times more than Malaysia	2.49 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	855.32 Terajoules Ranked 11th.	1,586.59 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 85% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	81.56 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	93.28 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 14% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	0.911 Terajoules Ranked 70th.	111.22 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 122 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	0.911 Terajoules Ranked 69th.	92.95 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 102 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	1.71 Ranked 11th. 45% more than Malaysia	1.18 Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	6.22 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 137 times more than Malaysia	0.0453 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	16.6 Ranked 32nd.	29.9 Ranked 19th. 80% more than Belarus
Consumption > Date of > Information	2005 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	5.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 693 times more than Malaysia	0.008 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 61st.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	80.42 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 37 times more than Malaysia	2.17 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-2,278 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	24,937 Terajoules Ranked 4th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.	2.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 32% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	7.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.	8.78 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 19% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	60,135 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 51 times more than Malaysia	1,171 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 134 times more than Malaysia	0.046 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	71,875 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	222,464 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	4,789 Terajoules Ranked 45th. 5 times more than Malaysia	962 Terajoules Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 13 times more than Malaysia	0.038 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	1,019.27 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 12th. 7 times more than Malaysia	155.76 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	9,964 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Malaysia	3,948 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	49,629 Terajoules Ranked 37th.	160,174 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 3 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	51,329 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	64,475 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 26% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	5.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 2 times more than Malaysia	2.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	1,019.27 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 12th. 7 times more than Malaysia	155.76 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	9,964 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Malaysia	3,948 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	158,273 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 4 times more than Malaysia	38,618 Terajoules Ranked 8th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	16.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 11 times more than Malaysia	1.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	43.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 2 times more than Malaysia	20.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 17th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	80.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th.	95.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 18% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	586,591 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 6% more than Malaysia	552,037 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	60.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Malaysia	21.78 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	80.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th.	95.11 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 18% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	788,159 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	2.41 million Terajoules Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Imports	777,075 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 14 times more than Malaysia	56,066 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	8,265 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	41,003 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 5 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	788,159 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	2.41 million Terajoules Ranked 10th. 3 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Gross > Production	8,806 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.	2.87 million Terajoules Ranked 10th. 326 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	79.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 36 times more than Malaysia	2.21 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	8,806 Terajoules Ranked 71st.	2.4 million Terajoules Ranked 11th. 273 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Net inland availability	141,974 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	227,583 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 60% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	14.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th. 62% more than Malaysia	8.98 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	11.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 87th.	3,817.84 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 319 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Total resources	117,063 Terajoules Ranked 89th.	96.77 million Terajoules Ranked 14th. 827 times more than Belarus
Proved > Reserves	2.83 billion cu m Ranked 89th.	2.35 trillion cu m Ranked 16th. 830 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	44.87 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 4th. 1539 times more than Malaysia	29.15 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 23th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	1.9 Ranked 11th. 45% more than Malaysia	1.31 Ranked 15th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	18.5 Ranked 32nd.	33.2 Ranked 19th. 79% more than Belarus
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	1.8 Ranked 31st.	3.2 Ranked 19th. 78% more than Belarus
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.69 Ranked 32nd.	1.23 Ranked 19th. 78% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	60.7 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Malaysia	21.36 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.496 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 13 times more than Malaysia	0.0372 Terajoules Ranked 61st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	1,031.15 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 7 times more than Malaysia	152.77 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	44.33 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 2 times more than Malaysia	19.87 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	16.38 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 11 times more than Malaysia	1.49 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Proved reserves per capita	294.21 cu m Ranked 86th.	79,315.81 cu m Ranked 18th. 270 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-235.745 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	1,064.74 Terajoules Ranked 3rd.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	5.61 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 693 times more than Malaysia	0.00809 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	7.44 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	8.61 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 16% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.14 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	6.2 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 21% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	81.56 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	93.28 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 14% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	14.69 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 67% more than Malaysia	8.81 Terajoules Ranked 45th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Belarus and Malaysia in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Conflict	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Travel
Energy	Lifestyle	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Belarus & Malaysia

Definitions

Citation

Compare Belarus and Malaysia in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Belarus and Malaysia in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation