Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Belarus & Poland

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Belarus	Poland
Consumption	21.82 billion cu m Ranked 23th. 52% more than Poland	14.38 billion cu m Ranked 24th.
Consumption > Per capita	2.24 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Poland	425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 51st.
Consumption per capita	1,788.16 cu m Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Poland	428.03 cu m Ranked 41st.
Imports	21.02 billion cu m Ranked 15th.	37.38 billion cu m Ranked 13th. 78% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	18,152 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 2 times more than Poland	9,004 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	54,187 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	150,123 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 3 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	7.44 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 2 times more than Poland	3.39 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.424 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	0.582 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 37% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.14 Terajoules Ranked 29th. Twice as much as Poland	2.58 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	81.56 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 5 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	14.69 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 52% more than Poland	9.69 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0121 Terajoules Ranked 85th.	0.0767 Terajoules Ranked 67th. 6 times more than Belarus
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	298.42 cu m Ranked 81st.	4,315.98 cu m Ranked 55th. 14 times more than Belarus
Proved reserves	2.83 billion cu m Ranked 92nd.	92 billion cu m Ranked 53th. 32 times more than Belarus
Imports per capita	1,851.27 cu m Ranked 2nd. 7 times more than Poland	260.91 cu m Ranked 32nd.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.69 Ranked 32nd. 41% more than Poland	0.49 Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 97% more than Poland	2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	428,318 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 9 times more than Poland	49,729 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 8 times more than Poland	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	1,031.15 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Poland	287.22 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	5.31 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 2 times more than Poland	2.46 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	855.32 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Poland	186.56 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	81.56 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 5 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	0.911 Terajoules Ranked 70th.	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 5 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	0.911 Terajoules Ranked 69th.	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 49th. 5 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	1.71 Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Poland	0.312 Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	6.22 Terajoules Ranked 28th. 4% more than Poland	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	16.6 Ranked 32nd. 39% more than Poland	11.9 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2005 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-2,278 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	8,431 Terajoules Ranked 5th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.419 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.	0.582 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 39% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	4,789 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	78,027 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 16 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.	2.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 4 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation > Per capita	1,019.27 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Poland	287.22 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation	9,964 Terajoules Ranked 17th.	10,962 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 10% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	49,629 Terajoules Ranked 37th.	98,333 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 98% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	51,329 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	93,843 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 83% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	5.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 2 times more than Poland	2.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	1,019.27 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Poland	287.22 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	9,964 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	10,962 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 10% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	118.56 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 23th. 4 times more than Poland	31.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	80.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 5 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	586,591 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 9 times more than Poland	63,897 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	60.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 36 times more than Poland	1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	80.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 5 times more than Poland	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	788,159 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 38% more than Poland	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	8,806 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 21 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	11.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 87th.	76.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th. 6 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Total resources	117,063 Terajoules Ranked 89th.	2.93 million Terajoules Ranked 58th. 25 times more than Belarus
Proved > Reserves	2.83 billion cu m Ranked 89th.	164.8 billion cu m Ranked 47th. 58 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	18.5 Ranked 32nd. 40% more than Poland	13.2 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	1.8 Ranked 31st. 38% more than Poland	1.3 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.69 Ranked 32nd. 41% more than Poland	0.49 Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	60.7 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 36 times more than Poland	1.67 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	16.38 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 46 times more than Poland	0.358 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-235.745 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	220.91 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	5.61 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 43% more than Poland	3.93 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	7.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 2 times more than Poland	3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	60,135 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	229,354 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 4 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th. 2% more than Poland	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	71,875 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	129,549 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 80% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	158,273 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 12 times more than Poland	13,647 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	1,159 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	1,204 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 4% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	16.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 45 times more than Poland	0.358 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	43.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 34 times more than Poland	1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 77th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	788,159 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 38% more than Poland	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Imports	777,075 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 95% more than Poland	398,547 Terajoules Ranked 14th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	8,265 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 16% more than Poland	7,120 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	79.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 8 times more than Poland	10.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	8,806 Terajoules Ranked 71st.	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 45th. 21 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Net inland availability	141,974 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	369,865 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	14.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th. 50% more than Poland	9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	44.87 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 4th.	-26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	4,094 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	22,212 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 5 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	1.9 Ranked 11th. 5 times more than Poland	0.346 Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.496 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	2.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 4 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other transportation per million	1,031.15 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 4 times more than Poland	287.22 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	119.94 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 4 times more than Poland	31.55 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	44.33 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 34 times more than Poland	1.3 Terajoules Ranked 76th.
Proved reserves per capita	294.21 cu m Ranked 86th.	2,396.84 cu m Ranked 62nd. 8 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	5.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 41% more than Poland	3.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	80.42 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 8 times more than Poland	10.44 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 8 times more than Poland	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Belarus and Poland in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Conflict	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Travel
Energy	Lifestyle	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Belarus & Poland

Definitions

Citation

Compare Belarus and Poland in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Belarus and Poland in

Factoid #46

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation