Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Belarus & United Kingdom

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Belarus	United Kingdom
Consumption	21.82 billion cu m Ranked 23th.	82.21 billion cu m Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Per capita	2.24 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 10th. 49% more than United Kingdom	1.5 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 17th.
Consumption per capita	1,788.16 cu m Ranked 9th. 26% more than United Kingdom	1,414.8 cu m Ranked 12th.
Imports	21.02 billion cu m Ranked 15th.	49.1 billion cu m Ranked 6th. 2 times more than Belarus
Imports per capita	1,851.27 cu m Ranked 2nd. 3 times more than United Kingdom	664.28 cu m Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	18,152 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	149,119 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 8 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by households	54,187 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	1.37 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 25 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.424 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	0.503 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 19% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	5.14 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	5.91 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 15% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	81.56 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 24% more than United Kingdom	65.58 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	14.69 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	38.09 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0121 Terajoules Ranked 85th.	0.312 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 26 times more than Belarus
Production	None	None
Proved > Reserves per capita	298.42 cu m Ranked 81st.	4,689.17 cu m Ranked 53th. 16 times more than Belarus
Proved reserves	2.83 billion cu m Ranked 92nd.	246 billion cu m Ranked 41st. 87 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.69 Ranked 32nd.	3.65 Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	5.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.	5.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 16% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	428,318 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	1.2 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 3 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 19th.	2.48 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 32% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	5.31 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 9 times more than United Kingdom	0.581 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	855.32 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 46% more than United Kingdom	584.15 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	81.56 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 24% more than United Kingdom	65.58 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	0.911 Terajoules Ranked 70th.	60.89 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 67 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	0.911 Terajoules Ranked 69th.	60.89 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 67 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	1.71 Ranked 11th. 16% more than United Kingdom	1.47 Ranked 13th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	6.22 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	29.2 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	16.6 Ranked 32nd.	88.2 Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Date of > Information	2005 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	5.54 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th.	22.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 4 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	80.42 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 8 times more than United Kingdom	10.36 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	1.86 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.	2.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th. 33% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.419 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.	0.503 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 20% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	4,789 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	376,027 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 79 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th.	6.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 13 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	49,629 Terajoules Ranked 37th.	356,062 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	51,329 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 47% more than United Kingdom	34,996 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	5.25 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 9 times more than United Kingdom	0.581 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	118.56 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 23th.	131.57 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 20th. 11% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	788,159 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	3.95 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Imports	777,075 Terajoules Ranked 8th. 25% more than United Kingdom	624,135 Terajoules Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	8,265 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	35,180 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 4 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	788,159 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	3.95 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Gross > Production	8,806 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.	3.67 million Terajoules Ranked 6th. 416 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	11.97 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 87th.	311.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th. 26 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Total resources	117,063 Terajoules Ranked 89th.	18.77 million Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 160 times more than Belarus
Proved > Reserves	2.83 billion cu m Ranked 89th.	292 billion cu m Ranked 40th. 103 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	1.9 Ranked 11th. 16% more than United Kingdom	1.64 Ranked 13th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	18.5 Ranked 32nd.	98 Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.69 Ranked 32nd.	3.65 Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	16.38 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 13 times more than United Kingdom	1.24 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-235.745 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 3 times more than United Kingdom	-78.971 Terajoules Ranked 25th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	5.61 Terajoules Ranked 24th.	22.83 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 4 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	7.44 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	8.89 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 20% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	60,135 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	1.76 million Terajoules Ranked 4th. 29 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 28th.	29.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 8th. 5 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	71,875 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	535,457 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	158,273 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 2 times more than United Kingdom	74,600 Terajoules Ranked 5th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	1,159 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	7,924 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 7 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	16.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 13 times more than United Kingdom	1.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	43.81 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 2 times more than United Kingdom	19.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	80.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 23% more than United Kingdom	65.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	586,591 Terajoules Ranked 14th.	1.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	60.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 3 times more than United Kingdom	21.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	80.62 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 16th. 23% more than United Kingdom	65.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	79.49 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 8 times more than United Kingdom	10.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	8,806 Terajoules Ranked 71st.	3.67 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 416 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Net inland availability	141,974 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	2.29 million Terajoules Ranked 4th. 16 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	14.52 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 35th.	38.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	44.87 trillion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 4th. 1113 times more than United Kingdom	40.31 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	4,094 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	30,276 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 7 times more than Belarus
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	1.8 Ranked 31st.	9.5 Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	60.7 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 3 times more than United Kingdom	21.19 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.496 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	6.24 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 13 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	119.94 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.	131.57 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 10% more than Belarus
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	44.33 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 2 times more than United Kingdom	19.96 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Proved reserves per capita	294.21 cu m Ranked 86th.	3,880.4 cu m Ranked 57th. 13 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-2,278 Terajoules Ranked 28th.	-4,756 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 2 times more than Belarus
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	7.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th.	8.89 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 21% more than Belarus

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Belarus and United Kingdom in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Conflict	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather
Energy	Lifestyle

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Belarus & United Kingdom

Definitions

Citation

Compare Belarus and United Kingdom in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Belarus and United Kingdom in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation