Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Denmark

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Brazil	Denmark
Consumption	26.7 billion cu m Ranked 20th. 6 times more than Denmark	4.18 billion cu m Ranked 39th.
Consumption > Per capita	104,204.69 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 66th.	833,010.25 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 39th. 8 times more than Brazil
Consumption per capita	96.75 cu m Ranked 47th.	798.47 cu m Ranked 27th. 8 times more than Brazil
Imports	13.3 billion cu m Ranked 20th. 52 times more than Denmark	254 million cu m Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	95,025 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 24 times more than Denmark	3,980 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	8,397 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	32,277 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	83,913 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Denmark	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	1.1 Ranked 35th. 22% more than Denmark	0.9 Ranked 38th.
Production > Billion cubic metres	11.1 Ranked 35th. 18% more than Denmark	9.4 Ranked 38th.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.41 Ranked 35th. 17% more than Denmark	0.35 Ranked 38th.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	0.0603 Ranked 44th.	1.74 Ranked 19th. 29 times more than Brazil
Proved reserves	395.5 billion cu m Ranked 31st. 9 times more than Denmark	42.98 billion cu m Ranked 63th.
Reserves	221.7 billion cubic feet Ranked 29th. 3 times more than Denmark	81.98 billion cubic feet Ranked 38th.
Reserves per capita	1,191.02 cubic feet Ranked 53th.	15,127.05 cubic feet Ranked 25th. 13 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.263 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 84% more than Denmark	0.143 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	12,414 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 19% more than Denmark	10,446 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.067 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 60th.	1.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 23th. 29 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	173,795 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 6 times more than Denmark	28,556 Terajoules Ranked 50th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	4.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 75th.	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 9 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	177,040 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 79% more than Denmark	98,659 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 83th.	18.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 19 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	0.523 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.	1.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	4.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 75th.	37.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 9 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	777,553 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Denmark	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	774,173 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 74% more than Denmark	444,626 Terajoules Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-2,065,396,349.558 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 31st.	-654,175,478,556.227 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 43th. 317 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	49,081 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 63 times more than Denmark	773 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.103 Ranked 53th.	0.999 Ranked 28th. 10 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	1.8 Ranked 32nd. 4 times more than Denmark	0.5 Ranked 48th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.0543 Ranked 44th.	1.57 Ranked 19th. 29 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.0667 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	1.93 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 29 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million	8.63 Terajoules Ranked 4th.	114.4 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 13 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	0.87 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	460.93 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 530 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	0.951 Terajoules Ranked 78th.	17.19 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 18 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage per 1000	0.679 Terajoules Ranked 15th.	5.06 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Brazil
Proved reserves per capita	1,967.57 cu m Ranked 64th.	7,735.15 cu m Ranked 41st. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	0.045 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th.	5.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 132 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	0.524 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	1.5 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Brazil
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	10 Ranked 35th. 18% more than Denmark	8.5 Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	0.849 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 12th.	957.6 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 1128 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	131 Terajoules Ranked 10th.	4,969 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 38 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.51 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th.	0.735 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 44% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.71 Terajoules Ranked 63th.	6.15 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.264 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 85% more than Denmark	0.143 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.451 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 13 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.934 Terajoules Ranked 64th.	5.27 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 6 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	4.18 Terajoules Ranked 74th.	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 9 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	2.23 Terajoules Ranked 68th.	14.49 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 7 times more than Brazil
Proved > Reserves per capita	1,865.68 cu m Ranked 67th.	11,049.66 cu m Ranked 38th. 6 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0641 Terajoules Ranked 71st.	0.59 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 9 times more than Brazil
Imports per capita	43.62 cu m Ranked 42nd.	0.0 Ranked 98th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.7 Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Denmark	0.2 Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.932 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 64th.	5.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 6 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	177,040 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 90% more than Denmark	93,184 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.51 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	0.734 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 44% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	57.28 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 2 times more than Denmark	24.36 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	4.18 Terajoules Ranked 74th.	37.76 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 9 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	4.16 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	82.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 20 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	2.31 Terajoules Ranked 61st.	80.55 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 35 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.0924 Ranked 53th.	0.907 Ranked 26th. 10 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.113 Terajoules Ranked 65th.	8.34 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 74 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	17 Ranked 30th. 3 times more than Denmark	4.9 Ranked 48th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2005 est.	2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.41 Ranked 35th. 17% more than Denmark	0.35 Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	131 Terajoules Ranked 16th.	-1,226 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.768 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.	5.7 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 7 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	143,174 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 5 times more than Denmark	30,883 Terajoules Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th.	6.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	20,973 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	45,221 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 2 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.113 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 67th.	8.35 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 74 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	317,901 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 10 times more than Denmark	33,309 Terajoules Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita	0.009 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th.	0.114 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 2nd. 13 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks	1,549 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 2 times more than Denmark	620 Terajoules Ranked 2nd.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	0.869 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 36th.	461.23 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 5th. 531 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	162 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	2,498 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 15 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	0.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 79th.	17.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 18 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Flared and vented	97,529 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 12 times more than Denmark	8,106 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	777,553 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 4 times more than Denmark	204,661 Terajoules Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage > Per capita	0.678 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 15th.	5.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th. 7 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	10,662 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 81 times more than Denmark	132 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Extraction loss shrinkage	126,426 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 5 times more than Denmark	27,092 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Net > Production	429,095 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	436,520 Terajoules Ranked 38th. 2% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Net inland availability	414,186 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 5 times more than Denmark	78,530 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	2.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.	14.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 7 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	64.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 73th.	590.79 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 9 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Total resources	11.94 million Terajoules Ranked 41st. 4 times more than Denmark	3.2 million Terajoules Ranked 57th.
Proved > Reserves	364.2 billion cu m Ranked 36th. 6 times more than Denmark	61.3 billion cu m Ranked 60th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	18.9 Ranked 30th. 3 times more than Denmark	5.4 Ranked 48th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.7 Ranked 31st. 3 times more than Denmark	0.2 Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	0.951 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.	18.2 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 19 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	0.847 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	957.67 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 1130 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	0.847 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	-226.223 Terajoules Ranked 29th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	0.0451 Terajoules Ranked 56th.	5.96 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 132 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.769 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	5.7 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 7 times more than Brazil

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Brazil and Denmark in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Denmark

Definitions

Citation

Compare Brazil and Denmark in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Brazil and Denmark in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation