Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Japan

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Brazil	Japan
Consumption	26.7 billion cu m Ranked 20th.	112.6 billion cu m Ranked 4th. 4 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Per capita	104,204.69 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 66th.	787,077.22 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 41st. 8 times more than Brazil
Consumption per capita	96.75 cu m Ranked 47th.	742.17 cu m Ranked 30th. 8 times more than Brazil
Imports	13.3 billion cu m Ranked 20th.	122.2 billion cu m Ranked 1st. 9 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	131 Terajoules Ranked 10th.	6,919 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 53 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	0.849 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 12th.	55.37 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 4th. 65 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	95,025 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 3 times more than Japan	35,348 Terajoules Ranked 21st.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.51 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 84% more than Japan	0.277 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	8,397 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	435,726 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 52 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.263 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.	0.572 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 2 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	83,913 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 8 times more than Japan	10,233 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	395.5 billion cu m Ranked 31st. 19 times more than Japan	20.9 billion cu m Ranked 73th.
Reserves	221.7 billion cubic feet Ranked 29th. 11 times more than Japan	20.02 billion cubic feet Ranked 56th.
Reserves per capita	1,191.02 cubic feet Ranked 53th. 8 times more than Japan	156.68 cubic feet Ranked 66th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	12,414 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	608,830 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 49 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.067 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 60th.	4.76 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 71 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.318 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 53 times more than Japan	0.006 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	59,261 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 84 times more than Japan	704 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	173,795 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 32% more than Japan	131,972 Terajoules Ranked 23th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	32,876 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 2 times more than Japan	16,206 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	4.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 75th.	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th. 6 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	177,040 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	2.06 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 12 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 83th.	16.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st. 17 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	4.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 75th.	25.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th. 6 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	777,553 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross > Production	774,173 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 6 times more than Japan	133,094 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Proved > Reserves	364.2 billion cu m Ranked 36th. 17 times more than Japan	20.9 billion cu m Ranked 74th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	49,081 Terajoules Ranked 11th.	73,082 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 49% more than Brazil
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.103 Ranked 53th.	0.565 Ranked 39th. 6 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	18.9 Ranked 30th.	72.2 Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	1.8 Ranked 32nd.	7 Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.7 Ranked 31st.	2.68 Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	0.951 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.	16.14 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 17 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.0667 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	4.76 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 71 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million	8.63 Terajoules Ranked 4th.	4,639.16 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 537 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	0.951 Terajoules Ranked 78th.	16.01 Terajoules Ranked 27th. 17 times more than Brazil
Proved reserves per capita	1,967.57 cu m Ranked 64th. 12 times more than Japan	164.24 cu m Ranked 90th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	0.045 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th.	3.41 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 76 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	1.87 Terajoules Ranked 50th.	24.69 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 13 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.451 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 6 times more than Japan	0.0801 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.934 Terajoules Ranked 64th.	1.03 Terajoules Ranked 60th. 11% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	4.18 Terajoules Ranked 74th.	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th. 6 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	2.23 Terajoules Ranked 68th.	10.06 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 5 times more than Brazil
Proved > Reserves per capita	1,865.68 cu m Ranked 67th. 11 times more than Japan	163.99 cu m Ranked 85th.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0641 Terajoules Ranked 71st. 4 times more than Japan	0.0156 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.
Imports per capita	43.62 cu m Ranked 42nd.	707.84 cu m Ranked 18th. 16 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.7 Ranked 31st.	2.68 Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.932 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 64th.	1.03 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th. 11% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	177,040 Terajoules Ranked 35th.	2.05 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 12 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.51 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 85% more than Japan	0.277 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.318 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 58 times more than Japan	0.00551 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.177 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 39% more than Japan	0.127 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	4.18 Terajoules Ranked 74th.	25.69 Terajoules Ranked 48th. 6 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	4.16 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 4 times more than Japan	1.04 Terajoules Ranked 69th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	2.31 Terajoules Ranked 61st. 2 times more than Japan	1.04 Terajoules Ranked 68th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.0924 Ranked 53th.	0.508 Ranked 39th. 5 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.113 Terajoules Ranked 65th.	8.18 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 73 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	17 Ranked 30th.	64.9 Ranked 8th. 4 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Date of > Information	2005 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	131 Terajoules Ranked 16th.	4,846 Terajoules Ranked 9th. 37 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.768 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th. 89% more than Japan	0.407 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	143,174 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 3 times more than Japan	52,067 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th.	1.88 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 56th. 10% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	20,973 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	1.04 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 50 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.113 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 67th.	8.18 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 25th. 72 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	317,901 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 32% more than Japan	240,402 Terajoules Ranked 22nd.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.176 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 39% more than Japan	0.127 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita	0.009 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th.	4.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 1st. 515 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks	1,549 Terajoules Ranked 2nd.	576,318 Terajoules Ranked 1st. 372 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	0.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 79th.	16.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th. 17 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	777,553 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	3.28 million Terajoules Ranked 7th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Imports	348,458 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	3.15 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 9 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	1.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st.	24.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 13 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Net > Production	429,095 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 3 times more than Japan	133,094 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	414,186 Terajoules Ranked 23th.	1.28 million Terajoules Ranked 8th. 3 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	2.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.	10.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st. 5 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	64.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 73th. 4 times more than Japan	15.57 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 84th.
Including LNG > Total resources	11.94 million Terajoules Ranked 41st. 6 times more than Japan	1.99 million Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-2,065,396,349.558 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 31st.	-1,045,783,962,308.45 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 45th. 506 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	0.847 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	55.37 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 65 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	0.847 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	37.93 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 45 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	0.0451 Terajoules Ranked 56th.	3.41 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 76 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.769 Terajoules Ranked 45th. 89% more than Japan	0.407 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.71 Terajoules Ranked 63th.	1.88 Terajoules Ranked 56th. 10% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.264 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	0.572 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 2 times more than Brazil

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Brazil and Japan in

Agriculture	Energy	Lifestyle
Background	Environment	Media
Conflict	Geography	Military
Cost of living	Government	People
Crime	Health	Religion
Culture	Import	Sports
Disasters	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Japan

Definitions

Citation

Compare Brazil and Japan in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Brazil and Japan in

Factoid #29

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation