Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Poland

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Brazil	Poland
Consumption	26.7 billion cu m Ranked 20th. 86% more than Poland	14.38 billion cu m Ranked 24th.
Consumption > Per capita	104,204.69 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 66th.	425,253.06 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 51st. 4 times more than Brazil
Consumption per capita	96.75 cu m Ranked 47th.	428.03 cu m Ranked 41st. 4 times more than Brazil
Imports	13.3 billion cu m Ranked 20th.	37.38 billion cu m Ranked 13th. 3 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	95,025 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 11 times more than Poland	9,004 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	8,397 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	150,123 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 18 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.934 Terajoules Ranked 64th.	2.58 Terajoules Ranked 46th. 3 times more than Brazil
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	1.1 Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Poland	0.4 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres	11.1 Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Poland	4.4 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.41 Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Poland	0.16 Ranked 45th.
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	0.0603 Ranked 44th.	0.115 Ranked 42nd. 91% more than Brazil
Proved reserves	395.5 billion cu m Ranked 31st. 4 times more than Poland	92 billion cu m Ranked 53th.
Reserves	221.7 billion cubic feet Ranked 29th. 44% more than Poland	154.4 billion cubic feet Ranked 31st.
Reserves per capita	1,191.02 cubic feet Ranked 53th.	4,045.54 cubic feet Ranked 39th. 3 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	4.18 Terajoules Ranked 74th.	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	2.23 Terajoules Ranked 68th.	9.69 Terajoules Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Brazil
Proved > Reserves per capita	1,865.68 cu m Ranked 67th.	4,315.98 cu m Ranked 55th. 2 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.0641 Terajoules Ranked 71st.	0.0767 Terajoules Ranked 67th. 20% more than Brazil
Imports per capita	43.62 cu m Ranked 42nd.	260.91 cu m Ranked 32nd. 6 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.7 Ranked 31st. 43% more than Poland	0.49 Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.932 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 64th.	2.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. 3 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	177,040 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 4 times more than Poland	49,729 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.51 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Poland	0.236 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.318 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	0.671 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	404.59 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 41% more than Poland	287.22 Terajoules Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.177 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	2.46 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 14 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	57.28 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	186.56 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 3 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	4.18 Terajoules Ranked 74th.	14.91 Terajoules Ranked 60th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	4.16 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 50th. 14% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	2.31 Terajoules Ranked 61st.	4.73 Terajoules Ranked 49th. 2 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.0924 Ranked 53th.	0.312 Ranked 46th. 3 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.113 Terajoules Ranked 65th.	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 53 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	17 Ranked 30th. 43% more than Poland	11.9 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2005 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	0.045 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th.	3.93 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 87 times more than Brazil
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	10 Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Poland	3.9 Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita	0.849 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 12th.	-233.755 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 15th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers	131 Terajoules Ranked 10th.	-8,990 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.51 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Poland	0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	83,913 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 11 times more than Poland	7,618 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	0.263 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.	0.582 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 24th. 2 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	12,414 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	78,027 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 6 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.067 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 60th.	2.04 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 22nd. 31 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.318 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 27th.	0.671 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 19th. 2 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	59,261 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 2 times more than Poland	25,600 Terajoules Ranked 13th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	173,795 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 77% more than Poland	98,333 Terajoules Ranked 27th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	32,876 Terajoules Ranked 27th.	93,843 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 3 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	162 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	1,204 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 7 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	0.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 79th.	1.3 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 77th. 37% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	4.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 75th.	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	177,040 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 3 times more than Poland	63,897 Terajoules Ranked 63th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 83th.	1.67 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 76th. 76% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	4.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 75th.	14.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th. 4 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	777,553 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 37% more than Poland	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Gross > Production	774,173 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 4 times more than Poland	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	1.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 51st.	10.44 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 6 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Net > Production	429,095 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 2 times more than Poland	180,700 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	414,186 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 12% more than Poland	369,865 Terajoules Ranked 26th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	2.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th.	9.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th. 4 times more than Brazil
Proved > Reserves	364.2 billion cu m Ranked 36th. 2 times more than Poland	164.8 billion cu m Ranked 47th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.7 Ranked 31st. 43% more than Poland	0.49 Ranked 36th.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.0543 Ranked 44th.	0.102 Ranked 42nd. 88% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.0667 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	2.04 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 31 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million	8.63 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Poland	3.19 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	0.87 Terajoules Ranked 36th.	31.55 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 36 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	0.951 Terajoules Ranked 78th.	1.3 Terajoules Ranked 76th. 37% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million	0.847 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	-233.741 Terajoules Ranked 15th.
Proved reserves per capita	1,967.57 cu m Ranked 64th.	2,396.84 cu m Ranked 62nd. 22% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	0.847 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	220.91 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 261 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	0.0451 Terajoules Ranked 56th.	3.93 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 87 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.769 Terajoules Ranked 45th.	0.928 Terajoules Ranked 42nd. 21% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	1.71 Terajoules Ranked 63th.	3.39 Terajoules Ranked 47th. 99% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	0.264 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	0.582 Terajoules Ranked 24th. 2 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.451 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 2 times more than Poland	0.2 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.768 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th.	0.928 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd. 21% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	143,174 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 4 times more than Poland	35,420 Terajoules Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	1.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th.	3.39 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 46th. Twice as much as Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	20,973 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	229,354 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 11 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.113 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 67th.	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 53 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	317,901 Terajoules Ranked 16th. 2 times more than Poland	129,549 Terajoules Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.176 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.	2.46 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 21st. 14 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	404.02 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 17th. 41% more than Poland	287.22 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 20th.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	75,312 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Poland	10,962 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita	0.009 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 4th. 3 times more than Poland	0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks	1,549 Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 13 times more than Poland	123 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	0.869 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 36th.	31.55 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 29th. 36 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	777,553 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 37% more than Poland	569,149 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Imports	348,458 Terajoules Ranked 20th.	398,547 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 14% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	10,662 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 50% more than Poland	7,120 Terajoules Ranked 24th.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	64.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 73th.	76.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th. 20% more than Brazil
Including LNG > Total resources	11.94 million Terajoules Ranked 41st. 4 times more than Poland	2.93 million Terajoules Ranked 58th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-2,065,396,349.558 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 31st.	-26,096,901,778.964 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 35th. 13 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	49,081 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 2 times more than Poland	22,212 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	0.103 Ranked 53th.	0.346 Ranked 46th. 3 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	18.9 Ranked 30th. 43% more than Poland	13.2 Ranked 36th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	1.8 Ranked 32nd. 38% more than Poland	1.3 Ranked 36th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	0.951 Terajoules Ranked 82nd.	1.67 Terajoules Ranked 76th. 76% more than Brazil
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.41 Ranked 35th. 3 times more than Poland	0.16 Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	1.87 Terajoules Ranked 50th.	10.44 Terajoules Ranked 33th. 6 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	131 Terajoules Ranked 16th.	8,431 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 64 times more than Brazil

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Brazil and Poland in

Agriculture	Environment	Military
Background	Geography	People
Conflict	Government	Religion
Cost of living	Health	Sports
Crime	Import	Terrorism
Culture	Industry	Transport
Disasters	Labor	Travel
Economy	Language	Weather
Education	Lifestyle
Energy	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Poland

Definitions

Citation

Compare Brazil and Poland in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Brazil and Poland in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation