×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Brazil & Sweden

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Brazil Sweden HISTORY
Consumption 26.7 billion cu m
Ranked 20th. 21 times more than Sweden
1.3 billion cu m
Ranked 46th.

Consumption > Per capita 104,204.69 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 66th.
111,393 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 64th. 7% more than Brazil

Consumption per capita 96.75 cu m
Ranked 47th.
132.17 cu m
Ranked 46th. 37% more than Brazil

Imports 13.3 billion cu m
Ranked 20th. 12 times more than Sweden
1.13 billion cu m
Ranked 33th.

Imports per capita 43.62 cu m
Ranked 42nd.
132.17 cu m
Ranked 36th. 3 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry 95,025 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 24 times more than Sweden
3,944 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by households 8,397 Terajoules
Ranked 44th. 4 times more than Sweden
2,127 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 0.932 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 64th.
1.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 58th. 15% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 0.934 Terajoules
Ranked 64th.
1.07 Terajoules
Ranked 59th. 15% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 177,040 Terajoules
Ranked 35th. 19 times more than Sweden
9,193 Terajoules
Ranked 82nd.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 4.18 Terajoules
Ranked 74th.
4.34 Terajoules
Ranked 73th. 4% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 2.23 Terajoules
Ranked 68th.
2.53 Terajoules
Ranked 64th. 14% more than Brazil

Production None None
Proved > Reserves per capita 1,865.68 cu m
Ranked 67th.
0.0
Ranked 122nd.
Proved reserves 395.5 billion cu m
Ranked 31st.
0.0
Ranked 130th.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 0.51 Terajoules
Ranked 36th. 17% more than Sweden
0.437 Terajoules
Ranked 38th.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million 404.59 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 5 times more than Sweden
79.18 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent 17
Ranked 30th. 24 times more than Sweden
0.7
Ranked 60th.
Consumption > Date of > Information 2005 est. 2003 est.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000 1.87 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
4.34 Terajoules
Ranked 44th. 2 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.51 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 36th. 17% more than Sweden
0.437 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 37th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 0.263 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th. 88% more than Sweden
0.14 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 37th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 12,414 Terajoules
Ranked 33th. 3 times more than Sweden
4,077 Terajoules
Ranked 49th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 0.067 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 60th.
0.452 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 47th. 7 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 173,795 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 18 times more than Sweden
9,688 Terajoules
Ranked 68th.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 4.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 75th.
4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 74th. 4% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 177,040 Terajoules
Ranked 36th. 16 times more than Sweden
10,733 Terajoules
Ranked 83th.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 0.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 83th.
1.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 82nd. 25% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 4.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 75th.
4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 74th. 4% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 777,553 Terajoules
Ranked 30th. 20 times more than Sweden
39,199 Terajoules
Ranked 82nd.

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita -2,065,396,349.558 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 31st.
616.24 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 8th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry 49,081 Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 39 times more than Sweden
1,261 Terajoules
Ranked 40th.

Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million 0.103
Ranked 53th. 15% more than Sweden
0.089
Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 0.0451 Terajoules
Ranked 56th.
0.236 Terajoules
Ranked 51st. 5 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 0.769 Terajoules
Ranked 45th. 110 times more than Sweden
0.00698 Terajoules
Ranked 71st.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 1.71 Terajoules
Ranked 63th. 4% more than Sweden
1.65 Terajoules
Ranked 64th.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000 0.264 Terajoules
Ranked 33th. 89% more than Sweden
0.14 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 0.768 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 45th. 110 times more than Sweden
0.007 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 72nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 143,174 Terajoules
Ranked 17th. 2273 times more than Sweden
63 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 1.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 63th. 3% more than Sweden
1.65 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 65th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 20,973 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd. 3 times more than Sweden
7,234 Terajoules
Ranked 58th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 0.113 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 67th.
0.802 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 55th. 7 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 317,901 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 21 times more than Sweden
14,893 Terajoules
Ranked 70th.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita 404.02 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 17th. 5 times more than Sweden
79.23 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 32nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry 75,312 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 105 times more than Sweden
715 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.

Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks > Per capita 0.009 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th.
0.024 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks 1,549 Terajoules
Ranked 2nd. 7 times more than Sweden
219 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd.

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita 0.869 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 36th.
114.14 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 25th. 131 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture 162 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
1,030 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 6 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 0.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 79th.
1.02 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 78th. 7% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 777,553 Terajoules
Ranked 30th. 20 times more than Sweden
39,199 Terajoules
Ranked 82nd.

Including LNG > Imports 348,458 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 9 times more than Sweden
39,199 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.

Including LNG > Imports > Per capita 1.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 51st.
4.34 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 45th. 2 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Net inland availability 414,186 Terajoules
Ranked 23th. 18 times more than Sweden
22,842 Terajoules
Ranked 73th.

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 2.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 69th.
2.53 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 65th. 14% more than Brazil

Proved > Reserves 364.2 billion cu m
Ranked 36th.
0.0
Ranked 128th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres 18.9
Ranked 30th. 24 times more than Sweden
0.8
Ranked 60th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day 1.8
Ranked 32nd. 18 times more than Sweden
0.1
Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 0.951 Terajoules
Ranked 82nd.
1.19 Terajoules
Ranked 81st. 25% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 0.0667 Terajoules
Ranked 58th.
0.452 Terajoules
Ranked 45th. 7 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion in gasworks per million 8.63 Terajoules
Ranked 4th.
24.25 Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 3 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million 0.87 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.
114.07 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 131 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 0.951 Terajoules
Ranked 78th.
1.02 Terajoules
Ranked 77th. 7% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 4.18 Terajoules
Ranked 74th.
4.34 Terajoules
Ranked 73th. 4% more than Brazil

Proved reserves per capita 1,967.57 cu m
Ranked 64th.
0.0
Ranked 130th.

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.0924
Ranked 53th. 19% more than Sweden
0.0778
Ranked 55th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 0.113 Terajoules
Ranked 65th.
0.801 Terajoules
Ranked 53th. 7 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 0.045 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 57th.
0.236 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd. 5 times more than Brazil

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×