×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Brazil & United Kingdom

Definitions

STAT Brazil United Kingdom HISTORY
Consumption 26.7 billion cu m
Ranked 20th.
82.21 billion cu m
Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Brazil

Consumption > Per capita 104,204.69 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 66th.
1.5 million cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 17th. 14 times more than Brazil

Consumption per capita 96.75 cu m
Ranked 47th.
1,414.8 cu m
Ranked 12th. 15 times more than Brazil

Imports 13.3 billion cu m
Ranked 20th.
49.1 billion cu m
Ranked 6th. 4 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry 95,025 Terajoules
Ranked 14th.
149,119 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 57% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by households 8,397 Terajoules
Ranked 44th.
1.37 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 164 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita 0.263 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 34th.
0.503 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th. 91% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants 83,913 Terajoules
Ranked 20th.
265,147 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 12,414 Terajoules
Ranked 33th.
376,027 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 30 times more than Brazil

Production None None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day 1.1
Ranked 35th.
9.3
Ranked 4th. 8 times more than Brazil
Production > Billion cubic metres 11.1
Ranked 35th.
95.9
Ranked 4th. 9 times more than Brazil
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total 0.41
Ranked 35th.
3.56
Ranked 4th. 9 times more than Brazil
Production > Billion cubic metres per million 0.0603
Ranked 44th.
1.6
Ranked 20th. 27 times more than Brazil
Proved reserves 395.5 billion cu m
Ranked 31st. 61% more than United Kingdom
246 billion cu m
Ranked 41st.

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 0.067 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 60th.
6.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th. 93 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita 0.318 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
0.119 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 33th.

Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries 59,261 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 8 times more than United Kingdom
7,153 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 173,795 Terajoules
Ranked 18th.
356,062 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 2 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses 32,876 Terajoules
Ranked 27th.
34,996 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 6% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture 162 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
7,924 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 49 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 0.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 79th.
19.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 21 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Flared and vented 97,529 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.
101,000 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 4% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 777,553 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.
3.95 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Imports 348,458 Terajoules
Ranked 20th.
624,135 Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 79% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses 10,662 Terajoules
Ranked 20th.
35,180 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita 64.06 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 73th.
311.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 44th. 5 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Total resources 11.94 million Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
18.77 million Terajoules
Ranked 32nd. 57% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita -2,065,396,349.558 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 31st.
40.31 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 22nd.

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry 49,081 Terajoules
Ranked 11th. 62% more than United Kingdom
30,276 Terajoules
Ranked 16th.

Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million 0.103
Ranked 53th.
1.64
Ranked 13th. 16 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Billion cubic metres 18.9
Ranked 30th.
98
Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day 1.8
Ranked 32nd.
9.5
Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Brazil
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 0.41
Ranked 35th.
3.56
Ranked 4th. 9 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 0.045 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 57th.
22.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th. 507 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000 0.524 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.
1.69 Terajoules
Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Imports per 1000 1.87 Terajoules
Ranked 50th.
10.36 Terajoules
Ranked 35th. 6 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Changes in stocks 131 Terajoules
Ranked 16th.
-4,756 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers 131 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
-5,468 Terajoules
Ranked 15th.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.51 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 36th.
2.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 15th. 5 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000 0.264 Terajoules
Ranked 33th.
0.503 Terajoules
Ranked 27th. 91% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000 0.451 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
4.4 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 10 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 0.934 Terajoules
Ranked 64th.
5.91 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 6 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 4.18 Terajoules
Ranked 74th.
65.58 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 16 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 2.23 Terajoules
Ranked 68th.
38.09 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 17 times more than Brazil

Proved > Reserves per capita 1,865.68 cu m
Ranked 67th.
4,689.17 cu m
Ranked 53th. 3 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Total resources per capita 0.0641 Terajoules
Ranked 71st.
0.312 Terajoules
Ranked 43th. 5 times more than Brazil

Imports per capita 43.62 cu m
Ranked 42nd.
664.28 cu m
Ranked 20th. 15 times more than Brazil

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 0.7
Ranked 31st.
3.65
Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 0.932 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 64th.
5.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 24th. 6 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 177,040 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.
1.2 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 7 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 0.51 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.
2.48 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 5 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000 0.318 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 3 times more than United Kingdom
0.119 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd.

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000 0.177 Terajoules
Ranked 43th.
0.581 Terajoules
Ranked 36th. 3 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million 57.28 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
584.15 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 10 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 4.18 Terajoules
Ranked 74th.
65.58 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 16 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000 4.16 Terajoules
Ranked 53th.
60.89 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 15 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000 2.31 Terajoules
Ranked 61st.
60.89 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 26 times more than Brazil

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.0924
Ranked 53th.
1.47
Ranked 13th. 16 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 0.113 Terajoules
Ranked 65th.
29.2 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 259 times more than Brazil

Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent 17
Ranked 30th.
88.2
Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Brazil
Consumption > Date of > Information 2005 est. 2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent 10
Ranked 35th.
86.3
Ranked 4th. 9 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita 0.849 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 12th.
-94.21 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 14th.

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 0.768 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 45th.
5.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 7 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 143,174 Terajoules
Ranked 17th.
306,298 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 2 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 1.71 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 63th.
8.89 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 26th. 5 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 20,973 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.
1.76 million Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 84 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 0.113 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 67th.
29.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th. 258 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 317,901 Terajoules
Ranked 16th.
535,457 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 68% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita 0.176 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th.
0.581 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 36th. 3 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita 0.869 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 36th.
131.57 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 20th. 151 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 4.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 75th.
65.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 16 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 177,040 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.
1.28 million Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 7 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 0.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 83th.
21.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 22 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita 0.523 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 27th.
1.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 4.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 75th.
65.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 16 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 777,553 Terajoules
Ranked 30th.
3.95 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Gross > Production 774,173 Terajoules
Ranked 31st.
3.67 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 5 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Imports > Per capita 1.87 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 51st.
10.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 35th. 6 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Net > Production 429,095 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
3.67 million Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 9 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Net inland availability 414,186 Terajoules
Ranked 23th.
2.29 million Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 6 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 2.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 69th.
38.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th. 17 times more than Brazil

Proved > Reserves 364.2 billion cu m
Ranked 36th. 25% more than United Kingdom
292 billion cu m
Ranked 40th.

Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total 0.7
Ranked 31st.
3.65
Ranked 3rd. 5 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 0.951 Terajoules
Ranked 82nd.
21.19 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 22 times more than Brazil

Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.0543
Ranked 44th.
1.44
Ranked 20th. 27 times more than Brazil
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 0.0667 Terajoules
Ranked 58th.
6.24 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 94 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million 0.87 Terajoules
Ranked 36th.
131.57 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 151 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 0.951 Terajoules
Ranked 78th.
19.96 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 21 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million 0.847 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.
-94.735 Terajoules
Ranked 14th.

Proved reserves per capita 1,967.57 cu m
Ranked 64th.
3,880.4 cu m
Ranked 57th. 97% more than Brazil

Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million 0.847 Terajoules
Ranked 20th.
-78.971 Terajoules
Ranked 25th.

Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 0.0451 Terajoules
Ranked 56th.
22.83 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 506 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 0.769 Terajoules
Ranked 45th.
5.09 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 7 times more than Brazil

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 1.71 Terajoules
Ranked 63th.
8.89 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 5 times more than Brazil

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×