Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Burma & Pakistan

Compare vs for

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Production > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Production > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Production, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Reserves per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita: . Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Production, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Burma	Pakistan
Consumption	3.24 billion cu m Ranked 51st.	42.9 billion cu m Ranked 15th. 13 times more than Burma
Consumption > Per capita	80,614.46 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 36th.	217,013.83 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 25th. 3 times more than Burma
Consumption per capita	75.23 cu m Ranked 36th.	224.54 cu m Ranked 25th. 3 times more than Burma
Imports	0.0 Ranked 72nd.	0.0 Ranked 134th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	88 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	35,281 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 401 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	0.002 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd.	0.226 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 45th. 113 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by households	28 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	167,638 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 5987 times more than Burma
Production	None	None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day	0.7 Ranked 40th.	2.2 Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Burma
Production > Billion cubic metres	7.4 Ranked 40th.	23.2 Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Burma
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	0.27 Ranked 40th.	0.86 Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Burma
Production > Billion cubic metres per million	0.148 Ranked 41st.	0.15 Ranked 40th. 1% more than Burma
Proved reserves	283.2 billion cu m Ranked 38th.	679.6 billion cu m Ranked 28th. 2 times more than Burma
Reserves	314.4 billion cubic feet Ranked 26th.	695.6 billion cubic feet Ranked 22nd. 2 times more than Burma
Reserves per capita	6,265.32 cubic feet Ranked 33th. 42% more than Pakistan	4,403.33 cubic feet Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	5,589 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	12,072 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 2 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	28,170 Terajoules Ranked 26th.	28,675 Terajoules Ranked 25th. 2% more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	0.558 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st. 3 times more than Pakistan	0.184 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	20,512 Terajoules Ranked 55th.	273,029 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 13 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	7,636 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	127,020 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 17 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	1.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 89th.	7.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th. 4 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	34,584 Terajoules Ranked 74th.	417,768 Terajoules Ranked 23th. 12 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	0.685 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 87th.	2.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 72nd. 4 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita	0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.	0.257 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 86 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	1.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 89th.	7.55 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th. 4 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Net > Production	457,413 Terajoules Ranked 34th.	1.18 million Terajoules Ranked 21st. 3 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Net inland availability	48,807 Terajoules Ranked 58th.	557,903 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 11 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	0.966 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 80th.	3.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 57th. 4 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	-43,614,023.739 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 54th.	323.01 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 11th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	0.689 Terajoules Ranked 86th.	2.64 Terajoules Ranked 71st. 4 times more than Burma
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.132 Ranked 41st.	0.135 Ranked 39th. 2% more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	0.561 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 3 times more than Pakistan	0.182 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	0.689 Terajoules Ranked 83th.	2.64 Terajoules Ranked 68th. 4 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	0.001 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th.	1.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd. 1076 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000	0.00329 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.	0.253 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 77 times more than Burma
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent	6.6 Ranked 40th.	20.9 Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.111 Terajoules Ranked 44th. 46% more than Pakistan	0.0764 Terajoules Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	0.409 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.	1.73 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 4 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	1.96 Terajoules Ranked 88th.	7.45 Terajoules Ranked 67th. 4 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	0.973 Terajoules Ranked 78th.	3.53 Terajoules Ranked 58th. 4 times more than Burma
Proved > Reserves per capita	5,453.37 cu m Ranked 48th. 12% more than Pakistan	4,852.46 cu m Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Total resources per capita	0.377 Terajoules Ranked 40th. 89% more than Pakistan	0.199 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Imports per capita	0.0 Ranked 22nd.	0.0 Ranked 75th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	0.406 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 73th.	1.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th. 4 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	34,584 Terajoules Ranked 68th.	417,768 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 12 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	0.00182 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.	0.223 Terajoules Ranked 45th. 123 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry per million	2.49 Terajoules Ranked 43th.	241.16 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 97 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	0.152 Terajoules Ranked 44th.	0.804 Terajoules Ranked 34th. 5 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	1.96 Terajoules Ranked 88th.	7.45 Terajoules Ranked 67th. 4 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000	9.12 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 18% more than Pakistan	7.74 Terajoules Ranked 45th.
Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000	9.12 Terajoules Ranked 39th. 22% more than Pakistan	7.45 Terajoules Ranked 44th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	0.561 Terajoules Ranked 57th.	1.24 Terajoules Ranked 48th. 2 times more than Burma
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	0.27 Ranked 40th.	0.86 Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-30 Terajoules Ranked 12th.	-101 Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 3 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.149 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 63th. 94% more than Pakistan	0.077 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 68th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	7,530 Terajoules Ranked 53th.	12,072 Terajoules Ranked 45th. 60% more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	0.406 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 76th.	2.08 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 53th. 5 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	28,170 Terajoules Ranked 39th.	196,313 Terajoules Ranked 21st. 7 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	0.558 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 59th.	1.26 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th. 2 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	20,512 Terajoules Ranked 63th.	323,494 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 16 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	0.151 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 44th.	0.815 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th. 5 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry > Per capita	2.47 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 43th.	244.56 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 22nd. 99 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by transportation industry	125 Terajoules Ranked 41st.	38,096 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 305 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	0.685 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 84th.	2.68 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 69th. 4 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Flared and vented	165 Terajoules Ranked 40th.	40,000 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 242 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	98,557 Terajoules Ranked 69th.	1.18 million Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 12 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	98,557 Terajoules Ranked 69th.	1.18 million Terajoules Ranked 22nd. 12 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Gross > Production	457,578 Terajoules Ranked 38th.	1.22 million Terajoules Ranked 24th. 3 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita	374.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 41st. 85% more than Pakistan	202.15 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 54th.
Including LNG > Total resources	18.93 million Terajoules Ranked 31st.	31.49 million Terajoules Ranked 26th. 66% more than Burma
Proved > Reserves	283.2 billion cu m Ranked 41st.	840.2 billion cu m Ranked 29th. 3 times more than Burma
Proved reserves per capita	5,133.47 cu m Ranked 52nd. 46% more than Pakistan	3,516.89 cu m Ranked 59th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-0.701 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 10% more than Pakistan	-0.639 Terajoules Ranked 19th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	0.000609 Terajoules Ranked 54th.	1.06 Terajoules Ranked 41st. 1743 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.15 Terajoules Ranked 62nd. 96% more than Pakistan	0.0764 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	0.409 Terajoules Ranked 75th.	2.05 Terajoules Ranked 53th. 5 times more than Burma

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005; CIA World Factbook, 28 July 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Burma and Pakistan in

Agriculture	Geography	Military
Background	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Travel
Energy	Lifestyle	Weather
Environment	Media

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Burma & Pakistan

Definitions

Citation

Compare Burma and Pakistan in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Burma and Pakistan in

Factoid #280

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation