×

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Burma & United Kingdom

Compare vs for  

Definitions

STAT Burma United Kingdom HISTORY
Consumption 3.24 billion cu m
Ranked 51st.
82.21 billion cu m
Ranked 7th. 25 times more than Burma

Consumption > Per capita 80,614.46 cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 36th.
1.5 million cu m per 1,000 people
Ranked 17th. 19 times more than Burma

Consumption per capita 75.23 cu m
Ranked 36th.
1,414.8 cu m
Ranked 12th. 19 times more than Burma

Imports 0.0
Ranked 72nd.
49.1 billion cu m
Ranked 6th.

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry 88 Terajoules
Ranked 53th.
149,119 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 1695 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by households 28 Terajoules
Ranked 55th.
1.37 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 49099 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Exports per 1000 7.15 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 24% more than United Kingdom
5.75 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd.

Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000 1.96 Terajoules
Ranked 88th.
65.58 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 33 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000 0.973 Terajoules
Ranked 78th.
38.09 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 39 times more than Burma

Production None None
Production > Billion cubic feet per day 0.7
Ranked 40th.
9.3
Ranked 4th. 13 times more than Burma
Production > Billion cubic metres 7.4
Ranked 40th.
95.9
Ranked 4th. 13 times more than Burma
Production > Billion cubic metres > Share of total 0.27
Ranked 40th.
3.56
Ranked 4th. 13 times more than Burma
Production > Billion cubic metres per million 0.148
Ranked 41st.
1.6
Ranked 20th. 11 times more than Burma
Proved reserves 283.2 billion cu m
Ranked 38th. 15% more than United Kingdom
246 billion cu m
Ranked 41st.

Proved > Reserves per capita 5,453.37 cu m
Ranked 48th. 16% more than United Kingdom
4,689.17 cu m
Ranked 53th.

Including LNG > Total resources per capita 0.377 Terajoules
Ranked 40th. 21% more than United Kingdom
0.312 Terajoules
Ranked 43th.

Imports per capita 0.0
Ranked 22nd.
664.28 cu m
Ranked 20th.

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita 0.406 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 73th.
5.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 24th. 15 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants 34,584 Terajoules
Ranked 68th.
1.2 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 35 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000 0.00182 Terajoules
Ranked 52nd.
2.48 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 1363 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000 0.0387 Terajoules
Ranked 38th.
0.119 Terajoules
Ranked 32nd. 3 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000 0.152 Terajoules
Ranked 44th.
0.581 Terajoules
Ranked 36th. 4 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000 1.96 Terajoules
Ranked 88th.
65.58 Terajoules
Ranked 19th. 33 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Gross > Production per 1000 9.12 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
60.89 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 7 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Net > Production per 1000 9.12 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
60.89 Terajoules
Ranked 22nd. 7 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000 0.561 Terajoules
Ranked 57th.
29.2 Terajoules
Ranked 8th. 52 times more than Burma

Consumption > Date of > Information 2003 est. 2003 est.
Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total 0.27
Ranked 40th.
3.56
Ranked 4th. 13 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Flared and vented per 1000 0.00329 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.
1.69 Terajoules
Ranked 21st. 513 times more than Burma

Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent 6.6
Ranked 40th.
86.3
Ranked 4th. 13 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Changes in stocks -30 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.
-4,756 Terajoules
Ranked 31st. 159 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers -30 Terajoules
Ranked 12th.
-5,468 Terajoules
Ranked 15th. 182 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita 0.002 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 52nd.
2.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 15th. 1238 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants 5,589 Terajoules
Ranked 41st.
265,147 Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 47 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers 28,170 Terajoules
Ranked 26th.
376,027 Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 13 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita 0.558 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 41st.
6.24 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 9th. 11 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita 0.038 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 39th.
0.119 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 33th. 3 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries 1,941 Terajoules
Ranked 35th.
7,153 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 4 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction 20,512 Terajoules
Ranked 55th.
356,062 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 17 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses 7,636 Terajoules
Ranked 42nd.
34,996 Terajoules
Ranked 26th. 5 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita 0.151 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 44th.
0.581 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 36th. 4 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Exports 358,856 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 4% more than United Kingdom
346,260 Terajoules
Ranked 21st.

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita 1.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 89th.
65.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 34 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy 34,584 Terajoules
Ranked 74th.
1.28 million Terajoules
Ranked 7th. 37 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita 0.685 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 87th.
21.19 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 31 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Flared and vented > Per capita 0.003 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 43th.
1.69 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 21st. 563 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita 1.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 89th.
65.58 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 34 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Gross inland availability 98,557 Terajoules
Ranked 69th.
3.95 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 40 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Gross > Production 457,578 Terajoules
Ranked 38th.
3.67 million Terajoules
Ranked 6th. 8 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Net > Production 457,413 Terajoules
Ranked 34th.
3.67 million Terajoules
Ranked 5th. 8 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Net inland availability 48,807 Terajoules
Ranked 58th.
2.29 million Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 47 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita 0.966 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 80th.
38.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 14th. 39 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita -43,614,023.739 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 54th.
40.31 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop
Ranked 22nd.

Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000 0.689 Terajoules
Ranked 86th.
21.19 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 31 times more than Burma

Production > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million 0.132
Ranked 41st.
1.44
Ranked 20th. 11 times more than Burma
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers per million -0.701 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
-94.735 Terajoules
Ranked 14th. 135 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million -0.701 Terajoules
Ranked 10th.
-78.971 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 113 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000 0.000609 Terajoules
Ranked 54th.
22.83 Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 37495 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000 0.15 Terajoules
Ranked 62nd.
5.09 Terajoules
Ranked 20th. 34 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000 0.409 Terajoules
Ranked 75th.
8.89 Terajoules
Ranked 25th. 22 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000 0.111 Terajoules
Ranked 44th.
4.4 Terajoules
Ranked 16th. 40 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000 0.409 Terajoules
Ranked 72nd.
5.91 Terajoules
Ranked 24th. 14 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita 0.149 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 63th.
5.09 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 34 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector 7,530 Terajoules
Ranked 53th.
306,298 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 41 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita 0.406 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 76th.
8.89 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 26th. 22 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers 28,170 Terajoules
Ranked 39th.
1.76 million Terajoules
Ranked 4th. 62 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita 0.558 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 59th.
29.2 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 8th. 52 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction 20,512 Terajoules
Ranked 63th.
535,457 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 26 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita 0.685 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 84th.
19.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 20th. 29 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Flared and vented 165 Terajoules
Ranked 40th.
101,000 Terajoules
Ranked 10th. 612 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Energy balance requirement 98,557 Terajoules
Ranked 69th.
3.95 million Terajoules
Ranked 3rd. 40 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Exports > Per capita 7.1 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 19th. 24% more than United Kingdom
5.75 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 22nd.

Including LNG > Total resources > Per capita 374.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 41st. 20% more than United Kingdom
311.64 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 44th.

Including LNG > Total resources 18.93 million Terajoules
Ranked 31st. 1% more than United Kingdom
18.77 million Terajoules
Ranked 32nd.

Proved > Reserves 283.2 billion cu m
Ranked 41st.
292 billion cu m
Ranked 40th. 3% more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000 0.561 Terajoules
Ranked 40th.
6.24 Terajoules
Ranked 9th. 11 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000 0.689 Terajoules
Ranked 83th.
19.96 Terajoules
Ranked 18th. 29 times more than Burma

Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita 0.001 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 54th.
22.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop
Ranked 4th. 22827 times more than Burma

Proved reserves per capita 5,133.47 cu m
Ranked 52nd. 32% more than United Kingdom
3,880.4 cu m
Ranked 57th.

Including LNG > Changes in stocks at producers > Per capita -0.723 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 10th.
-94.21 Terajoules per 1 million
Ranked 14th. 130 times more than Burma

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×